50 likes | 128 Views
Overall Economics of Alternatives. Steering Committee Meeting April 29, 2004 - SLC. Comparative Economics of Alternatives West-Wide Basis. Compared to 2013 case w/o resource or transmission additions. Estimating Cost & Benefits. Ideally
E N D
Overall Economics of Alternatives Steering Committee Meeting April 29, 2004 - SLC
Comparative Economics of AlternativesWest-Wide Basis Compared to 2013 case w/o resource or transmission additions RMATS 2013 Alternatives
Estimating Cost & Benefits Ideally • We’d have estimates of both costs and benefits for each year of each asset’s useful life • Net present value of annual benefits less annual costs But • We have initial capital expenditure estimates and can approximate many fixed costs over time, but only first year running cost savings (VOM Savings) • VOM savings should increase over time • RMATS VOM savings are driven by substituting coal & wind generation for gas-fired generation, i.e. resources with no expected real fuel escalation for resources with expected real fuel price escalation RMATS 2013 Alternatives
Cost and Benefit Comparison RMATS 2013 Alternatives
Cost/Benefit Estimate With Only First Year Savings • If benefits (VOM savings) are increasing in real terms over time, do not compare to costs that decrease in real terms over time • Real levelized costs are relatively comparable to first year VOM savings that go up • Objective: a representative year of costs and savings • Capital charge concept: present value of depreciation, interest, ROE, taxes, G&A – levelized over life of resources or transmission • Applied to initial investment. Currently using 10 percent for all resource additions and 8 percent for transmission additions (source: CERA) – subject to update • Other issues: whether include CO2 adder and renewable resource tax credit; wear and tear assumptions on non-wind resources due to wind • Several data needs are still outstanding RMATS 2013 Alternatives