520 likes | 671 Views
PennDOT’s Electronic Permitting System (EPS) Development, Deployment and Evolution. Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference October 2014. Agenda. Background on Highway Occupancy Permits (HOPs) “Old” permitting system, methods & procedures Identifying the need for a new system
E N D
PennDOT’s Electronic Permitting System (EPS)Development, Deployment and Evolution Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference October 2014
Agenda • Background on Highway Occupancy Permits (HOPs) • “Old” permitting system, methods & procedures • Identifying the need for a new system • Requirements identification • Project development - considerations and initiation • Testing, training and rollout • Benefits • Evolution - continued development and additional functionality
Highway Occupancy Permits (HOPs) • PennDOT uses the HOP process to regulate access to and occupancy of highways by driveways, local roads, and utilities • Permits are issued to: • Municipalities and municipal authorities • Businesses and land developers • Private property owners • Utility companies
Driveway Permits • Driveway permits must be obtained: • Prior to Altering an Existing Driveway • Change to the existing access • Change in the type and/or amount of traffic • Prior to Constructing a New Driveway
Utility Permits • Utility permits must be obtained: • When placing a utility facility or other structure or opening in Department ROW or Roadway • Boring/Jacking across the roadway • Longitudinal openings in ROW along shoulder edge
Miscellaneous Permits Miscellaneous Permits are needed to perform: • seismograph testing, • embankment alterations, • surface openings, • roadway improvements; • construct, replace, or remove curb and/or sidewalk; • connect to Department drainage facilities; • open test holes; • install, repair, replace or remove non-utility structures, • pedestrian overhead crossings, or pedestrian underpass crossings.
Permits Issued by Type • PennDOT issues roughly 15,000 permits per year.
2010 - Concerns with HOP Process • Slow turnaround for permit requests • Mailing, routing to different offices/units took time • Many reviews greater than 30 days • Multiple review cycles to complete process • No tracking once application submitted
Directive from Governor • #8 on list of top 50 ways to make Pennsylvania better for business: “Improve permitting process at state agencies like PennDOT.” • Improve Economic Development • Improve Customer Experience • Initiated HOP process improvement project in early 2011
Previous “paper” review process • Paper application • 4 copies of plans and documentation • 11 engineering districts + Central Office • Different management methods across districts • Difficulty tracking applications
“Old” System • Archaic technology • Mainframe permit database - built in 1980s • Dot Matrix Printers • Hard copies of plans - 4 sets • Monthly invoicing • Printing • Manual envelope insertion • Mailing
Requirements Identification Process • Assign Business Analysts (January 2011) • Conduct Interviews • Deputy Secretary • Central Office Permit Manager • District Permit Managers • Others • Interviews via: • Personal meetings • Teleconferences • Site visits
High Level Requirements • Replace paper application • Web based system • Provide process efficiency • Transparency to applicant • Workflow • Track Cycles • Reporting
Additional Requirements • Eliminate paper supporting application submission • Electronic signatures • Submission by applicant or ‘on behalf of’ • Electronic notification at milestones • Internal and external • Improved printing of permit • Improved invoicing
Project Development Considerations • Plan for initial release with subsequent releases for additional functionality • Initial release due by October 31, 2011 • Take advantage of existing systems/functionality • Develop common components • Plan for future use for other kinds of permits
Project Initiation – May 2011 • Establish working teams • Project Manager • Business Analysts • 3 Business BAs • 2 Development BAs • 5 Developers • Others as necessary • Establish Advisory Committee
Advisory Committee (Weekly Meetings) • EPS Project Manager • 11 Engineering Districts’ Permit Managers • Central Office Permit Manager • Business BAs
Purpose of Advisory Committee • Qualify Requirements • Answer questions • Discuss process/procedure changes • Acceptance sign-off • Prioritization of: • Requested requirements • Requested changes • Additional functionality • Some more vocal than others • Prioritization by voting
Additional Input • New system concepts introduced to trade groups • Utilities • Developers • Engineering Community • Gained valuable customer perspective
User Acceptance Testing • Involved a wide participant base • Internal users • Districts • Central Office • Other non-HOP related staff • External users • Utility company representatives • Engineering firm representatives
Training and Rollout • Developed training manuals • BAs Conducted face-to-face training classes • “Train the trainer” for District permit staff • Training offered to other District staff and customers • Trained 1,555 attendees: • 1168 - Basic (internal and external attendees) • 338 - Intermediate (internal attendees only) • 49 - Train the Trainer attendees • District staff provided additional “on demand” training classes
Benefits of EPS • Since inception (October 31, 2011) • Total permits issued: 42,000 (avg. 58 permits/day) • Utility permits issued: 35,000 • Driveway and Misc. permits issued: 7,000 • Total reviews completed: 60,000 (avg. 82 reviews/day)
Benefits of EPS • Shorter turnaround times • Since inception (October 31, 2011) • Average review time: <10 days • 99% reviewed within 30 days
Benefits of EPS • Reduced number of review cycles to issue permit • Cycles to issue permit (since October 31, 2011) • Permit issued on first review cycle – 85% • Within 2 Cycles – 95%
Benefits of EPS • Improvements for applicant: • Visibility/trackability • Electronic signature • Electronic submission • Electronic attachments • Electronic image of permit • Automatic email notifications
Benefits of EPS • Improvements for PennDOT: • Workflow & tracking • Paperless routing • Invoicing via email • Common components • i.e.: Used for invoicing for Outdoor Advertising Devices • Use for other types of permits • Bridge Occupancy Licenses
ePermitting Development • Built-in phases: • Phase 1: Apply online (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
EPS IT development & support resources • Two separate IT teams: • Development team (major new functionality) • Managed maintenance team (internal/external customer support requests, small system enhancements) • Teams worked towards coordinated releases
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting – Applying Online Electronic completion of M-945A form information… Information entered on the M-945A form can be entered quickly on ePermitting entry screens. Many of the fields are completed automatically.
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting - Supplements Types of Supplements: • Time Extension • Change in Work • Name Change
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting – Local Government Portal • Benefits of Portal • View all Driveway and/or Miscellaneous applications submitted to PennDOT statewide • Monitor/receive updates on permit applications within jurisdiction • Notify PennDOT that you want to review applications prior to permit issuance • Goals • Enhance coordination with municipalities to help align land development/HOP processes
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting – Emergency permit process Create Emergency Application Page Only the important information is needed.
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
ePermitting – Inspection & Close-out • Permittee can: • Notify PennDOT when work is beginning • Notify PennDOT when work is complete • PennDOT can: • Assign an inspector • Generate and e-mail inspection invoices to applicant • Identify type of close-out • Work completed consistent with permit/regulations • Work performed not consistent with permit/regulations • Work not completed • No work performed
ePermitting Development • Built in phases • Phase 1: Apply on-line (October 2011) • Phase 2: Generate and Issue Permits (July 2012) • Phase 3: Supplements (March 2013) • Phase 4: Local Government Portal (June 2013) • Phase 5: Emergency permit process (September 2013) • Phase 6: Inspection & Close-out (December 2013) • Phase 7: Bridge Occupancy Licenses (February 2014) • Phase 8: Assignment/Cancellation/Revocation (May 2014) • Phase 9: Residential Driveways/Data Archiving (July 2014)
Additional EPS Enhancements • Compatibility with Chrome, Firefox, etc. • Allows for field use on network-enabled iPads • Workflow streamlining • Tracking of recently accessed applications • Highlight applications awaiting review • Implementation of screen-specific guidance • Integration with MPMS IQ • GIS-based mapping system for PennDOTprojects
ePermitting – Integration with MPMS IQ • Allows user to locate permits and compare with planned or in-progress PennDOT projects