1 / 9

NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES FOR AUTOMOBILE MPG PREDICTION

ECE 539 Course Project. NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES FOR AUTOMOBILE MPG PREDICTION. 12/14/2010 Xiaofei Sun University of Wisconsin-Madison. Motivations. Nowadays, fuel economy becomes a great concern of the governments and drivers MPG varies with vehicle specs and conditions

sylvia
Download Presentation

NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES FOR AUTOMOBILE MPG PREDICTION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECE 539 Course Project NEURAL NETWORK APPROACHES FOR AUTOMOBILE MPG PREDICTION 12/14/2010 Xiaofei Sun University of Wisconsin-Madison

  2. Motivations • Nowadays, fuel economy becomes a great concern of the governments and drivers • MPG varies with vehicle specs and conditions • Database available online only accounts for different models • Large amount of data required • Build NN models to predict the MPG based on given specs and conditions • MLP • RBF 1/8

  3. Data Description • Source: UCI Machine Learning Repository • http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Auto+MPG • 8 Inputs: • 1. cylinder #2. displacement3. horsepower4. weight5. acceleration6. year7. origin8. manufacturer • 1 Output: MPG

  4. Data Preparation • 392 sets of data • Correlation coefficients between I/O were calculated

  5. Linear Regression • 7-way cross validation Training MSE = 11.12 Tuning MSE = 12.70

  6. Multi Layer Perceptron • MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox Used • Learning algorithms: • Gradient descent with momentum • Scaled conjugate gradient • Levenberg-Marquardt  • Datasets were randomly divided into three subsets: • 60% for training • 20% for validation (early stopping) • 20% for testing

  7. Multi Layer Perceptron • Structure: 7-12-1 feedforward network • Log-sigmoid function for hidden layer • Linear function for output layer Test MSE = 5.11 Training MSE = 4.03

  8. Conclusions and Future Work • MLP yields better performance than linear regression after fine tuning • Will construct radial basis function network, and compare with MLP

  9. ? Any Questions?

More Related