1 / 10

PulseCO Monitoring System

PulseCO Monitoring System. Charles E. Smith, MD, FRCPC Professor of Anesthesia MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio. Estimates of Preload. Clinical: BP, HR, capillary refill, urine Postural changes CVP PAC Echo. Systolic Pressure Variation.

sylvie
Download Presentation

PulseCO Monitoring System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PulseCO Monitoring System Charles E. Smith, MD, FRCPC Professor of Anesthesia MetroHealth Medical Center Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio

  2. Estimates of Preload • Clinical: BP, HR, capillary refill, urine • Postural changes • CVP • PAC • Echo

  3. Systolic Pressure Variation • Difference between maximal + minimal values of systolic BP during PPV •  down: ~ 5 mm Hg due to  venous return • SPV > 15 mm Hg, or  down > 15 mm Hg: • highly predictive of hypovolemia Marik: Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:405. Coriat: Anesth Analg 1994;78:46

  4. Gardner, in Critical Care, 3rd ed. Civetta. 1997, p 851

  5. Pulse Contour Analysis • 1. Transform BP waveform into volume – time waveform • 2. Derive uncalibrated SV • SV x HR = CO • 3. Calibrate using Li indicator [LidCO], Swan Ganz, or known SV from ejection fraction (Echo) • Assumptions: • PPV induces cyclical changes in SV • Changes in SV results in cyclical fluctuation of BP or SPV Linton R: 1997, 1998, 2000

  6. PulseCO SPV + SV • Predicts SV  in response to volume after cardiac surgery + in ICU[Reuter: BJA 2002; 88:124; Michard: Chest 2002; 121:2000] • Similar estimates of preload v. echo during hemorrhage[Preisman: BJA 2002; 88: 716] • Helpful in dx of hypovolemia after blast injury [Weiss: J Clin Anesth 1999; 11:132]

  7. Calibration Using EF • Obtain uncalibrated SV tracing from PulseCO monitor • Estimate EF from preop echo or baseline cardiac status [usual SV approx 0.7-1 ml/kg] • Enter calibration factor on monitor

  8. Calibration Using EF Example 1: uncalibrated SV reading 140 ml/beat; 70 kg pt with normal EF; calibration factor = 0.5 Example 2: uncalibrated SV reading 100 ml/beat; 70 kg pt with DCM; calibration factor = 0.3

  9. Pitfalls with SPV + SV • Inaccurate if • AI • IABP • Problems if • pronounced peripheral arterial vasoconstriction • damped art line • Arrhythmias

More Related