60 likes | 205 Views
Which energy policy for EU? Energy developments and challenges of climate change Ulla Sirkeinen 6.3.2007. An optimal energy mix EESC Opinion. A diversified mix All options to be kept open Strategy towards more non-emitting sources Efficiency Renewables Nuclear – safety and spent fuel
E N D
Which energy policy for EU?Energy developments and challenges of climate change Ulla Sirkeinen 6.3.2007 Ulla Sirkeinen
An optimal energy mixEESC Opinion • A diversified mix • All options to be kept open • Strategy towards more non-emitting sources • Efficiency • Renewables • Nuclear – safety and spent fuel • Clean coal • Framework for investments • Global post Kyoto solution • Increased R&D Ulla Sirkeinen
Role of technology and innovationEESC draft report on energy policy • Only technology and other innovation provide real progress • Innovation = renewal, ideas in wide use, economic value • Technology, management, organisation • Industry, services, public administration • Energy technologies,and flanking technologies • energy efficient technologies • ITC • operation and management • behaviour Ulla Sirkeinen
Conditions for innovationEESC draft report on energy policy • Skilled labour force • High class education and training, LLL • Competition • Market access – EU and globally • Network access • Investments – planning &authorisation, stable regulatory framework, long term agreements (?) • Level playing field on global markets • Ambitious targets – under certain circumstances: technology maturity, investment cycles • Regulation in some cases – overregulation not Ulla Sirkeinen
Instruments to enhance innovationEESC draft report on energy policy • R&D funding : EU EUR 887million – US $ 4,4 billion to energy • Public awareness – behaviour • Price mechanisms, taxation: influence user’s choices • Subsidies: effectiveness? market distortions? • Targets and obligations: winners and loosers, IA.. No suboptimal subtargets • Regulation, bindíng norms: plan carefully, risk of stiflig innovation • Voluntary standards, agreements: varying results – no drawbacks • Public procurement: equip byers, life cycle analysis Ulla Sirkeinen
Choice of instrumentsEESC draft report on energy policy • Far from markets, R&D-phase • Targeted R&D, demonstration support • Price signals not sufficient • Close to market, too costly • Price signal (CO2-price) • Support demand (regulation?) • Good product on market, low demand (ex. energy efficient technologies) • Awareness raising • Regulation (?) Ulla Sirkeinen