340 likes | 453 Views
Introduction. Preevent Evaluation Provided a Projection of How Effective a Potential Sponsorship Could Be if ImplementedPostevent Evaluation Provides an Assessment of How Well a Sponsorship Actually Performed
E N D
1. Chapter 10 Postevent Evaluation
2. Introduction Preevent Evaluation Provided a Projection of How Effective a Potential Sponsorship Could Be if Implemented
Postevent Evaluation Provides an Assessment of How Well a Sponsorship Actually Performed Was It a Productive Investment?
3. Sponsorship Accountability Cost versus Benefits
Best Use of Scarce Resources
Lack of a Standard Measure
4. Postevent Evaluation Methods Qualitative Assessments
Market Response
Change in Sales
Impact on Trade Participation
Change in Consumer Attitudes
Media Equivalencies
Comparable Value
Share
5. Qualitative Assessments Judgment & Perception
Example: AT&T Indicates that Its Sponsorship of the USOC Is a Good Investment because of the High-Impact, Emotional Appeal of the Olympic Games to American Consumers
6. Market Response:Change in Sales How Much Did Sales Increase as a Result of the Sponsorship?
Measures:
Before-and-After Measurements
Comparison to Same Period Sales
Compare Sponsorship Region to Rest of Market
Tie Sales Directly to the Sponsored Event
7. Example: Calculation ofChange in Sales (and ROI)
8. Market Response:Impact on Trade Participation Trade Represents the Intermediaries, Especially the Retailers, that Operate within the Sponsors Distribution Channel
Measure The Trades Increased Involvement with the Sponsor and the Sponsors Products
9. Market Response:Impact on Trade Participation Increase in POS Display at Retail Stores
Increase in Shelf Space
Increase in Number of Stores Selling the Sponsors Products
Investments in Cooperative Advertising
10. Example of Market Response:Impact on Trade Participation Listerine Sponsored Taste of Chicago
Number of Displays in Retail Stores In the Chicago Area Increased By 112%
Retailer Participation in Cooperative Advertising Reached the Highest Level in the History of the Listerine Brand
11. Market Response:Change in Consumer Attitudes What Attitude Is to Be Measured
Requires a Measurement of that Attitude Prior to the Implementation of the Sponsorship Program (Prior to the Initiation of the Leveraging Effort
12. Market Response:Change in Consumer Attitudes What Percentage of Consumers Anticipate Purchasing the Sponsors Products?
What Percentage of the Consumers Have a Favorable Opinion of the Sponsor?
How Has the Sponsors Image Changed in the Eyes of the Consumers?
13. Example of Market Response:Change in Consumer Attitudes Lloyds Bank Sponsored the Lloyds Bank Theatre Challenge in the United Kingdom
Attitudes Regarding the Following Issues Improved by 30% on the Scale:
Lloyds is a place to bank
Lloyds is Friendly
Lloyds is keeping up with the times
14. Media Equivalencies Sponsorships Result in Exposure
Of Particular Interest is the Viewers Exposure to the Sponsors Trademarks and Logos as Well as the Number of Times the Sponsors are Mentioned During the TV Broadcast that Features the Sponsored Property
15. Media Equivalencies The Key Question Is: How Do We Assign a Monetary Value to that Exposure?
One Answer Is to Determine How Much It Would Have Cost the Sponsor to Have Purchased an Equivalent Amount of Exposure Using Traditional Advertising during the Broadcast
16. Media Equivalencies:Comparable Value One of the More Popular Measurement Methodologies is Used by Joyce Julius & Associates
Value of Exposure
Value of Mentions
17. Joyce Julius & Associates Consider the following Example of a Sponsorship for a College Football Game
Cost for a traditional 30-second TV ad during the Broadcast is $210,000
That Equates to $7,000 per Second
18. Joyce Julius & Associates The Sponsors Logo Appeared on Camera and In-Focus for the Viewers to See for a Total of 3Minutes and 23 Seconds During the Broadcast of the Game
203 Seconds in Total
Value of That Component of the Sponsors Exposure = ($7,000 x 203) = $1,421,000
19. Joyce Julius & Associates The Sponsors Name Was Also Mentioned a Total of Eight Times during the Broadcast
Each Mention is Valued as Equal to 10 Seconds of Exposure
Value of that Component of the Sponsors Exposure = ((8 x10) x 7,000) = $560,000
20. Joyce Julius & Associates Comparable Value
Exposure = $1,421,000
Mentions = $560,000
Total Comparable Value = $1,981,000
21. Joyce Julius & Associates Was this a Good Sponsorship Investment?
We Need to Compare the Results to the Cost in Terms of the Rights Fee Paid by the Sponsor
22. Joyce Julius & Associates The Rights Fees Paid in this Example Were $1,000,000
The Comparable Value for the Sponsor Was Calculated to be $1,981,000
Was It a Good Investment?
23. Joyce Julius & Associates Sponsorship Should Produce $3 in Comparable Value for Every $1 Spent on Rights Fees
The Ratio in this Example Is: (1,981,000 / 1,000,000) = $1.981
The Sponsor Achieved Less than $2 in Comparable Value for Each Dollar Spent
24. Joyce Julius & Associates Why is a $3 Return Needed?
Why is $1 for $1 Not Sufficient?
Sponsorship Does Not Convey Persuasive Message; Not as Effective as Advertising
In Addition to Rights Fees, the Sponsor Should be Using Additional Resources for Its Leveraging Program
25. Media Equivalencies:Share (of Time) Another Measure Is to Use the Exposure Time to See How the Sponsor Fared Against The Rest of the Sponsors
Out of the Total Exposure Time Achieved by All Sponsors, What Percentage Was Attained by the Sponsor in Question?
26. Media Equivalencies:Share (of Time) Recall that The Sponsor of the Football Game Received 203 Seconds of Exposure
The Total Exposure Gained by All of the Sponsors Was 3,904 Seconds
The Sponsors Share of Time Can Be Calculated as (203 / 3,904) = .052 or 5.2%
27. Media Equivalencies:Share (of Comparable Value) Takes the Comparable Value Concept One Step Further
Starts By Calculating Comparable Value for the Sponsor
Continues by Calculating Aggregate Comparable Value Achieved by All Sponsors for the Event
28. Media Equivalencies:Share (of Comparable Value) Finishes by Calculating a Sponsors Comparable Value as a Share of the Total Comparable Value Attained by All of the Sponsors of that Event
Number Will Differ Slightly from Share of Time Figure because Comparable Value Also Takes Mention into Account
29. Media Equivalencies:Share (of Comparable Value) Sponsors Comparable Value: $1,981,000
Aggregate Comparable Value: $34,750,000
Sponsors Share of Comparable Value = (1,981,000 / 34,750,000) = .057 or 5.7%
30. Using Share Results Compare Your Sponsorship to Others for the Same Event
Compare Different Levels of Sponsorship
Compare Sponsorship of One Property to Sponsorship of Other Properties
31. Concerns About Postevent Evaluation Other, Perhaps Better, Techniques Are Available
Different Methodology Produces Different Result
Exposure May Not Translate into Sales
New Sponsors Often Overlook ROI
What Constitutes a Viewable Image
32. New and Improved Measures Recognition Grade (Joyce Julius)
Reduces Value for Small Images and for Cluttered Screen When Exposure Exists
NTIV Analysis (Joyce Julius)
Incorporates Other Media Exposure such as Radio, Print Media, and Venue Signage
33. New and Improved Measures Spindex (S-Comm)
Provides More Detailed Information
Sponsorshipp Scorecard (A.C. Nielsen)
Internet-Based; Considers Alternative Media
SPORTSi (TNSSport)
Electronic Measurement of Exposure
34. Closing Capsule Postevent Evaluation is Essential
Sponsors Likely to Request It It as Part of a Fulfillment Report from the Sponsee
Will Help Sponsor Decide Whether to Renew or Terminate a Sponsorship