1 / 15

PHAVEOS - the PHenology And Vegetation EO Service.

PHAVEOS - the PHenology And Vegetation EO Service. Lankester, T., Dash, J. 1 , Baret, F. 2 , Koetz, B. 3 & Hubbard, S. Presented by: Thomas Lankester 18th June 2010. Objectives.

tabib
Download Presentation

PHAVEOS - the PHenology And Vegetation EO Service.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHAVEOS - the PHenology And Vegetation EO Service. Lankester, T., Dash, J.1, Baret, F.2, Koetz, B.3 & Hubbard, S. Presented by: Thomas Lankester 18th June 2010

  2. Objectives • Provide time series of a range of vegetation parameters, utilising the unique spectral, spatial and temporal resolution of the MERIS instrument • Make spatially and temporally continuous time series available through visualisation and download of maps and phenology curves for individual locations • Support the development of a validated baseline time series (2005 - ) in advance of the launch of Sentinels 2 and 3

  3. Level 1b to Level 3 processing approach • Convert MERIS Level 1b data to Level 3 gridded maps, on a daily basis • geometric correction • radiometric correction • atmospheric correction • derive biophysical variable(s) • resample direct to target map grid (latlong, OSGB36, Irish Grid…)

  4. Level 1b geometric accuracy issues

  5. Level 1b geometric accuracy issues

  6. The blue grid represents the input (swath) data grid and the yellow grid the target map grid Level 3 geometric accuracy • To preserve geometric fidelity, resampling into the target map grid is carried out in a single step • To conserve the scene statistics area weighted (flux-conserving) resampling is used

  7. Step 1 apply a cubic spline interpolation of the raw data to generate a continuous time series Level 4 processing - interpolation

  8. Step 2 smooth using a local weighted least squares regression (if no negative noise bias) Level 4 processing - smoothing

  9. 3 Level 4 processing – interpolation metrics

  10. Level 4 processing – smoothing metric

  11. Level 3 validation • Moving from Stage 1 to Stage 2(+) validation requires considerable product generation • PHAVEOS is utilising the ESA Grid Processing On-Demand (G-POD) environment • Based on MERIS FRS data from 2005 – present, will deliver a range of Level 3 and Level 4 time series • LAI, fAPAR, fCover, MTCI, NDVI, 2G_RBi, …. • Provision of Level 3 products for MODIS match up sites (N. America) • Coverage of PAR@METER sites • OnLine Interactive Validation Exercise (OLIVE)

  12. Level 4 validation • Land Surface Phenology product validation methods TBD. • issues of spatial disparity where Sentinel 2 could bridge the gap. • Access to Forestry Commission intense monitoring sites (leaf litter collections, phenocams) • Access to UK Phenology Network • Access to tropical (DRC) deforestation ground truth

  13. Web Map Service dissemination concept

  14. Phenology metrics – what is the point? • Why use, and validate / inter-compare, basic phenology statistics? • Loss of information from a continuous time series (are we hiding intra-annular information) • Why inter-compare on a handful of measures when full time series are available? • Extraction of metrics is sensitive to interaction of smoothing and metric extraction methods • Different users are interested in different aspects of time series (phenology curves) Are simple metrics capturing a relevant reality?

  15. Phenological beauty is in the eye of the beholder Any questions

More Related