1 / 8

Passage Discussion and Analysis Trauma Theory

Passage Discussion and Analysis Trauma Theory. By Amy, Billy, Constance, Doris, Melody, Tiffany and Willa. Passage We Choose (1).

tadeo
Download Presentation

Passage Discussion and Analysis Trauma Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Passage Discussion and AnalysisTrauma Theory By Amy, Billy, Constance, Doris, Melody, Tiffany and Willa

  2. Passage We Choose (1) For some critics, such as Cathy Caruth, one of its most influential proponents, trauma theory provides a way of reconciling epistemological problems that follow in the wake of the Holocaust with a version of history, and so also of answering the charge that the focus on the materiality of language, associated with deconstruction, is negligently ahistorical. http://newsinhealth.nih.gov/images/Trauma.gif

  3. Passage We Choose (2) For Caruth, what is most significant about Freud’s nightmare-stricken soldiers from Beyond Pleasure Principle is the insistent return of what she terms “the literal” in their dreams: it is this returning literalness, she argues, “which thus constitutes trauma and points to its enigmatic core; the delay or incompletion in knowing, or even seeing, an overwhelming occurrence that then remains, in its insistent return, absolutely true to the event.” http://www.youthchg.com/crycut.jpg

  4. Passage We Choose (3) The historical truth of trauma, hence, is contained in its belatedness (what Freud called latency), as what is referenced by trauma is the moment, so to speak, when history is missed. History, thus, in its traumatic form, “can be grasped only in the very inaccessibility of its occurrence.” What war writing, in a very broad sense, does for Caruth is perform this inaccessibility so that it is in the paradoxes of language itself that we can rediscover the force of trauma and the imperative for a new form of historical witnessing. http://www.writehisanswer.com/Trauma%20Zone%20resized.jpg

  5. Passage We Choose (4) By “carrying that impossibility of knowing out of the empirical event itself,” Caruth concludes her introduction to the widely influential collection Trauma: Explorations in Memory, “trauma opens up and challenges us to a new kind of listening, the witnessing, precisely, of impossibility.” http://www.councilonalcoholism.net/images/Trauma_Logo.jpg

  6. Main Idea of the Passage Belatedness Paradoxes of language Reexamination http://news.xinhuanet.com/collection/2004-09/07/xinsrc_3920901071523262105515.jpg

  7. Example – 921 Earthquake • 921 Earthquake • Latency: Victims' Recall • Inaccessibility & Impossibility http://p7.p.pixnet.net/albums/userpics/7/3/722873/48d4094737675.jpg

  8. Thanks for listening!!! http://isiria.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/war-trauma.jpg

More Related