1 / 26

The Neurobiological Model of Addiction

The Neurobiological Model of Addiction. Carlton Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Addiction Science Research and Education Center University of Texas at Austin, USA APIA-Singapore, 2004. There once was a disease…. • people who had it were disgraced • sufferers felt isolated and alone

tadeo
Download Presentation

The Neurobiological Model of Addiction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Neurobiological Model of Addiction Carlton Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Addiction Science Research and Education Center University of Texas at Austin, USA APIA-Singapore, 2004

  2. There once was a disease….. • • people who had it were disgraced • • sufferers felt isolated and alone • • sufferers had permanent psychological damage • • the disease had insufficient funding for treatment • • there was poor understanding about the cause

  3. That disease was… • POLIO • (50 years ago) • If we had continued to onlytreat polio, • today we would have • computerized iron lungs! • But now polio is (almost) only a memory

  4. Today we face a challenge….. • • we’re trying hard to help people with drug problems, but we can’t help them all • • why? • - we hang on to outmoded beliefs • - we don’t have all the answers • - to policy makers, we appear to not know • what we’re doing

  5. S.P.A.M. is killing us! • • Stigma • • Prejudice • • Anger • • Misunderstanding • This has led to discrimination against addicts and inadequate $$ for treatment, education, research…

  6. Look at all the addictions we deal with! • • alcohol, heroin, cocaine, nicotine, marijuana, Rx drugs, club drugs… • • gambling, sex, internet, work, food • • ARE WE TAKING ON TOO MUCH?

  7. And then these….. • • cell phone • sugar • • Thomas Kincaid • A.A. meetings • • television • shoes • • Ben & Jerry’s • cars • • exercise • Disneyland • • “other people” • chocolate

  8. We must clarify the words “addiction” and “alcoholism”, both of which have lost their scientific and clinical value

  9. According to DSM-IV: • • substance (drug, chemical) abuse - overuse of drugs in cases where people are making poor judgments about drug use: (“a problem to solve”) • • not a minor problem, since drug abusers produce a majoreconomic impact on society

  10. But this is the disease* • • substance (drug, chemical) dependence - impaired control over drug use, probably caused by a dysfunction in the brain’s “pleasure pathway” (“a disease to conquer”) • • this requires twelve-step or other programs (treatments) • • dependence = addiction; alcohol abuse • is not “alcoholism” • * Based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-IV-TR • (DSM-IV-TR)

  11. RESEARCH VALIDITY ESTIMATE (RVE) (A Thoughtful Appraisal of High-Quality Scientific Research) High RVE • many large, well-controlled studies • replicable results • much peer-reviewed, published literature Low RVE • few replicable studies • highly speculative results • little peer-reviewed, published literature 100 - 0

  12. Does “abuse” lead to “dependence”? • 5-year follow-up of ~1300 men and women: • • 3% of abusers met criteria for depend. • • DSM diagnosis of depend.: chronic disorder w/ relatively severe course; DSM abuse - milder disorder that does not usuallyprogress to dependence • Schuckit et al., 2001 40

  13. Dependence as a disease

  14. Early vs. Late Onset • • It “looks” like many people evolve from abuse to dependence • • Some people become dependent during the first year of use • • Anecdotal - some people become “instantly dependent” • • Some abusers never become dependent

  15. Risk of Dependence • • data from National Comorbidity Survey • (n= 8,100), ages 15-54 y-o (both genders) • • dep occurrence in 10 years: cocaine, 15-16% • alcohol, 12-13%; marijuana, 8% • • cocaine: 5-6% dep in 1st year of use; 80% • were dependent within 3 years • Wagner & Anthony, 2002 30

  16. Other reports…. • Institute of Medicine- users • who become dependent: • • nicotine - 32% • • heroin - 23% • • cocaine - 17% • • alcohol - 15% • • marijuana - 9% 40

  17. The Mesolimbic Dopamine System*Model of Impaired Control___________________* a.k.a. Medial Forebrain Bundle (MFB)

  18. “Dependence” Brain Areas • • mesolimbic dopamine system • • “key elements of a basal forebrain macrostructure” • extended amygdala (Koob) • - central nucleus of amygdala • - bed nucleus of the stria terminalis • - transition zone, medial (shell) of NAc 60

  19. Medial Forebrain Bundle • • ventral tegmental area (VTA) • • (lateral) hypothalamus (LH) • • nucleus accumbens (NAcc) • • frontal cortex (FC) - key portions • - prefrontal cortex (PFC) • - orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) 95

  20. The disorder is involved with neurotransmitter problems in the dependence brain areas.

  21. Neurotransmitters Involved in Dependence • Probable functional dysregulation (MFB): • • Dopamine (DA) • • Serotonin (SER) • • Endorphins (END) • • Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) • • Glutamate (GLU) • • Acetylcholine (ACh) 70

  22. Drugs Associated wth Neurotransmitters • Why do people have “drugs of choice”? • • Dopamine - amphets, cocaine, ETOH • • Serotonin - LSD, ETOH • • Endorphins - opioids, ETOH • • GABA - benzos, ETOH • • Glutamate -ETOH • • Acetylcholine - nicotine, ETOH • (Marijuana?) (THIQs are no longer popular.) 70

  23. Is There a “Switch” to Turn on the Disease? • • GABA-A receptors in the VTA • • Two states: • - DA-independent (opiate-naive) • - DA (opiate-dependent, opiate-WD) • • opiate exposure and WD: the VTA GABA-A receptor “switches” • (VTA=ventral tegmental area, DA=dopamine, WD=withdrawal) • Laviolette et al., 2004 20

  24. A Brain Chemistry Disease! • • addicting drugs seem to “match” the transmitter system that is not normal • • cases range from mild to severe • • this is a chronic medical illness • • methadone and nicotine maintenance is evidence that some people require a chemical to overcome the non-normal transmitter system 80

  25. Remember the Best Academic Website in the World! www.utexas.edu/research/asrec

More Related