110 likes | 216 Views
Caught On The Rise. “Escalators chewing up dollars and sense” A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, Lee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19 th , 2007. Introduction.
E N D
Caught On The Rise “Escalators chewing up dollars and sense” A Case Study by Kevin Chao, Sarah Oaks, Lee Rommes, & Sarah Thomas Valley River Center, Eugene, Oregon. March 19th, 2007
Introduction • Escalators are a great convenience, but what do they cost us? For our case study, we explored how much time the mall escalators at the Valley River Center were being used, directly reflecting what percentage of the energy put into the escalator is wasted on a daily basis.
Precedent Team OtisCOOL TOOLS Dallas, TX January 27, 2007 A case study by: Walter Grondzik, Daniel Faoro, & Alison Kwok 12-hour use interval [$1.488/h (cooling) + $0.414 (motor)] x 12 hours = $22.824 per day On a year $22.824 per day x 365 = $8,330.76
Hypothesis • Constantly running escalators are not occupied during 50% of observed - - - business hours, resulting in energy losses.
General Information Energy Prices (Commercial Energy Rate: http://www.eweb.org/news/projects/rates.htm) Escalator Specifications (MEEB reference pg. 1472)
Data/Observations Minutes of Escalator Occupancy
Conclusion Escalator Resource Misappropriation After reviewing the data, we have found that we met our hypothesis that the escalators were being used less than 50% of the time at the Valley River Center Mall; therefore the escalator is not properly designed for the space and wastes energy when not in use.
Thank You Team Otis; Walter Grondzik, Daniel Faoro, & Alison Kwok Ady Leverette
Question & Answer It’s that time again!