1 / 33

Pinoy Cities on the Rise

Pinoy Cities on the Rise. The 50 Competitive Cities in the Philippines. Faustino Jerome Babate, MBA Danny Alfaras, MBA Alfie Custodio, MA Rey Tesoro, MA. What is “PCCRP” ?.

niyati
Download Presentation

Pinoy Cities on the Rise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pinoy Cities on the Rise The 50 Competitive Cities in the Philippines Faustino Jerome Babate, MBA Danny Alfaras, MBA Alfie Custodio, MA Rey Tesoro, MA

  2. What is “PCCRP”? • The project assesses the capacity of cities to provide an environment that nurtures the dynamism of its local enterprises and industries; • It assesses the general ability of the city to attract investments, entrepreneurs, and residents and uplift the living standards of its residents; • The project provides a benchmarking process that will aid individual cities in measuring competitiveness.

  3. Objectives of PCCRP: • Motivate local governments to change mentality from service provider to economic managers; • Provide feedback mechanism for business community to local governments • Ranking process functions as tool to pinpoint and analyze best practices in economic management of local governments and build the capacity of all LGUs by applying competitiveness lessons from other LGUs

  4. Based on World Competitiveness Yearbook by IMD • AIM Policy Center has been the Philippine partner of IMD since 1995 • Annual competitiveness ranking of 59 countries • Utilizes more than 300 indicators/ criteria from national statistics and executive surveys

  5. COST COMPETITIVENESS DYNAMISM OF LOCAL ECONOMY LINKAGES and ACCESSIBILITY HUMAN RESOURCES AND TRAINING INFRASTRUCTURE RESPONSIVENESS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT QUALITY OF LIFE Drivers of City Competitiveness

  6. Based on Ten Cities Ranking of 1999 1. General Santos 2. Angeles 3. Baguio 4. San Fernando, La Union 5. Davao 6. Iloilo 7. Zamboanga 8. Cagayan de Oro 9. Tacloban 10. Iligan

  7. PCCRP 2002 • 30 cities: 19 cities in Luzon 9 cities in Visayas 5 cities in Mindanao • Cities were classified into: Metro Cities • Mid-Sized Cities • Small Cities

  8. METRO CITIES 1. Davao 6.31 2. Cebu 5.97 3. Marikina 5.89 MID-SIZED CITIES 1. General Santos 6.77 2. Bacolod 6.16 3. Baguio 6.14 SMALL CITIES 1. San Fernando, Pampanga 6.35 2. Tagaytay 6.14 3. San Fernando, La Union 5.89 Based on PCCRP 2002

  9. What’s New with PCCRP 2003? • 50 cities: 23 cities in Luzon 11 cities in Visayas 16 cities in Mindanao

  10. PCCRP INDICATORS 70 70 56 60 44 50 40 30 20 10 0 1999 2002 2003 What’s New with PCCRP 2003? • Study utilized 70 indicators: 21 quantitative indicators 49 perception-based indicators • Executive surveys of owners and managers of SMEs in each city conducted between July 2003 to November 2003

  11. Scale to Assess Urban Competitiveness • Scores for each indicator are converted into a ten-point scale based on national and global benchmarks Score Qualitative Meaning • 1-2 Very low competitiveness (improve) • 3-4 Below average competitiveness(improve) • 5 Average competitiveness • 6-7 Above average competitiveness(enhance) • 8-10 High competitiveness(sustain)

  12. Philippine Cities Competitiveness Ranking Project 2003 • Data gathering was conducted in partnership with the following educational institutions • St. Louis University (Baguio) • Angeles University Foundation • De La Salle Lipa • Ateneo de Naga University • University of San Agustin (Iloilo) • University of San Carlos (Cebu) • Xavier University (Cagayan de Oro) • Mindanao State University (Marawi) • Ateneo de Zamboanga University • Ateneo de Davao University

  13. Philippine Cities Competitiveness Ranking Project 2003 Small Cities • Non-Metro Cities with Population Less than 200,000 Residents Cadiz Oroquieta Cavite Ozamis Cotabato Pagadian Dagupan Puerto Princesa Dipolog Roxas Dumaguete San Carlos Koronadal San Fernando, La Union Legaspi Sta. Rosa Malaybalay Surigao Marawi Tacloban Naga Tagaytay Olongapo Tagum Ormoc

  14. Philippine Cities Competitiveness Ranking Project 2003 Mid-Sized Cities • Non-Metro Cities with Population Greater than 200,000 Residents Angeles Iligan Bacolod Iloilo Baguio Lipa Batangas San Fernando, Pampanga Butuan Tarlac Cagayan de Oro Zamboanga General Santos

  15. Philippine Cities Competitiveness Ranking Project 2003 Metro Cities • Cities comprising Metro Manila, Metro Cebu and Metro Davao Cebu Mandaue Davao Manila Lapu-Lapu Marikina Las Piñas Muntinlupa Makati Pasig Mandaluyong Quezon City

  16. PCCRP MODEL COST COMPETITIVENESS Rating DYNAMISM OF LOCAL ECONOMY Rating LINKAGES and ACCESSIBILITY Rating City Ranking HUMAN RESOURCES and TRAINING Rating INFRASTRUCTURE Rating RESPONSIVENESS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT Rating QUALITY OF LIFE Rating

  17. METRO CITIES • Davao 5.83 • Muntinlupa 5.32 • Marikina 5.29 • MID-SIZED CITIES • General Santos 6.88 • Batangas 6.57 • Bacolod 6.48 • SMALL CITIES • Tagaytay 6.80 • Cavite 6.57 • Tagum 6.30 Drivers of Competitiveness:COST OF DOING BUSINESS COST OF ELECTRICITY 5-country Benchmark COUNTRY US$/kwh Indonesia 0.03 China 0.03 Thailand 0.06 Malaysia 0.06 Philippines 0.09 Source: World Competitiveness Yearbook 2002

  18. Drivers of Competitiveness:COST OF DOING BUSINESS • METRO CITIES • Davao 5.83 • Muntinlupa 5.32 • Marikina 5.29 • How expensive is it to operate in the city compared to other cities? • Cost of power for industrial use • Average rent of commercial space • Average cost for acquiring phone services • Minimum Wage • General profitability of doing business* • Informal fees in the city* • * Survey Data • MID-SIZED CITIES • General Santos 6.88 • Batangas 6.57 • Bacolod 6.48 • SMALL CITIES • Tagaytay 6.80 • Cavite 6.57 • Tagum 6.30

  19. Drivers of Competitiveness:DYNAMISM OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY • METRO CITIES • Cebu 6.99 • Makati 6.90 • Quezon City 6.87 • Can the city attract and foster inward investments? • Average household income • Local inflation rate • Percentage of top 200 corporations • Pop’n vs. fast-food chain locators • Market size • Consumer Price Index • Tourism sector is vibrant* • Business revenues expected to increase* • Business access to financing* • Regulatory environment is conducive to business* • * Survey Data • MID-SIZED CITIES • Iloilo 6.93 • Bacolod 6.58 • Cagayan de Oro 6.53 • SMALL CITIES • Tacloban 6.29 • Tagaytay 6.19 • Sta. Rosa 5.87

  20. METRO CITIES • Davao 6.48 • Cebu 6.31 • Las Piñas 6.28 • MID-SIZED CITIES • General Santos 6.59 • Batangas 6.42 • 2. San Fernando, Pampanga 6.42 • SMALL CITIES • Legaspi 6.41 • Koronadal 6.32 • Tacloban 5.25 Drivers of Competitiveness:LINKAGES AND ACCESSIBILITY • How easy is it to transport goods and services from the city? • Raw materials are located near the city* • Transporting raw materials from sources takes a short time* • International entry and exit points are located near the city* • Availability of business support services* • Benefits of business collaboration in the city* • If the level of national government agencies services is good* • * Survey Data

  21. Drivers of Competitiveness:HUMAN RESOURCES AND TRAINING • METRO CITIES • Pasig 7.32 • Cebu 7.19 • Makati 7.14 • MID-SIZED CITIES • Bacolod 7.36 • Iloilo 7.29 • 3. Cagayan de Oro 6.84 • SMALL CITIES • San Fernando, La Union 6.76 • Koronadal 6.56 • 2. Legaspi 5.56 • How well equipped is the population to build and take advantage of opportunity in the locality? • Number of tertiary educational institutions • Number of vocational Institutions • Skilled labor availability* • Easily trainable workforce* • Appropriate academic programs for local industry* • Adequate IT training programs* • Eagerness of workers to skills development* • Importance of investing in skills development* • Availability of training programs organized by schools and industry partners* • Expectation on worker performance* • Constructive labor-management relations* • Availability of businesses that allows on-the-job trainess* • Effective management of workers* • Link between job satisfaction and worker productivity* • If poor labor practices are discouraged in the city* • Strong worker suggestion on business operations* • * Survey Data

  22. Drivers of Competitiveness:RESPONSIVENESS OF LGU • METRO CITIES • Marikina 7.15 • Muntinlupa 6.35 • Las Piñas 6.24 • MID-SIZED CITIES • San Fernando, Pampanga 6.52 • Bacolod 6.18 • Cagayan de Oro 6.13 • SMALL CITIES • San Carlos 6.59 • Tagaytay 6.44 • Legaspi 6.30 • Can the LGU respond to systematic and short-lived issues with a well grounded and focused vision? • Percentage of IRA to LGU revenue • If securing a business is simple and efficient* • If the city government is transparent in its dealings* • If city’s administration of justice is fair* • If city policies and regulations are reflective of business needs* • If local government holds regular forums to elicit opinions from constituents* • If the city’s Clean and Green Program is effective* • If business taxes are reasonable* • If the city’s master development plan is appropriate to business sector’s needs* • If land use regulations are reasonable and flexible* • If LGU is involved in developing human resources* • If LGU programs to assist displaced workers are effective* • * Survey Data

  23. Drivers of Competitiveness:INFRASTRUCTURE • METRO CITIES • Marikina 8.15 • Pasig 7.54 • Makati 7.36 • MID-SIZED CITIES • Bacolod 6.46 • Cagayan de Oro 6.17 • San Fernando, Pampanga 6.10 • SMALL CITIES • Ormoc 6.19 • 1. Sta. Rosa 6.19 • 2 Dagupan 6.12 • Are the necessary physical, telecommunications, technological, infrastructure, and knowledge support services present? • Number of banks • Road density • Vehicle density • Number of internet service providers • Well- managed road network and traffic* • Road clearance during peak hours* • Reliability of electric power services* • Abundance of water supply* • Easy connection of telephone lines from other service providers* • Adequate cellular phone signals* • Reliability of ISPs* • Adequate garbage management* • * Survey Data

  24. METRO CITIES • Marikina 6.96 • Mandaluyong 6.68 • Las Piñas 6.40 • MID-SIZED CITIES • Bacolod 7.04 • Baguio 6.02 • San Fernando, 5.82 Pampanga • SMALL CITIES • San Fernando, La Union 6.59 • Olongapo 6.32 • Koronadal 6.20 Drivers of Competitiveness:QUALITY OF LIFE • How well-off are residents in terms of quality of environment and life? • Incidence of theft per 100,000 Pop. • Incidence of murder per 100,000 Pop. • Hospital beds per 100,000 Pop. • Life Expectancy at birth • Roads and public open spaces are clean* • Open bodies of water are clean* • Air quality is clean* • Rest and recreational facilities are adequate* • Conduciveness of the security environment to businesses. • * Survey Data

  25. Recognition of the Most Competitive Philippine Cities

  26. Overall Competitiveness SMALL CITIES 1. Koronadal 6.17 2. San Fernando, La Union 6.09 3. Tagaytay 6.05

  27. SMALL CITIES: RANKING BY DRIVER

  28. Overall Competitiveness MID-SIZED CITIES 1. Bacolod 6.62 2. San Fernando, Pampanga 6.24 3. Cagayan de Oro 6.18

  29. MID-SIZED CITIES: RANKING BY DRIVER

  30. Overall Competitiveness METRO CITIES 1. Marikina 6.58 2. Pasig 6.36 3. Davao 5.89

  31. METRO CITIES: RANKING BY DRIVER

  32. PCCRP 2003: TRAITS OF THE MOST COMPETITIVE PHILIPPINE CITIES • Low cost of doing business and broad market base • Proximity to other growth centers • Competent Workforce • Vibrant tourism sector • Strong supporting environment • Very responsive local government

  33. Next Steps • City Competitiveness Roadshows: Nationwide • City Competitiveness Best Practices Analysis: • Marikina, Pasig, and Davao • Bacolod, San Fernando, Pampanga, and Cagayan de Oro • Koronadal, San Fernando, La Union, and Tagaytay • Pinoy Cities on the Rise 2004 Magazine • Leadership indicators in PCCRP • Regionalize the City Competitiveness Ranking Project • City Competitiveness Ranking 2005

More Related