180 likes | 325 Views
Statewide Electronic Mentoring Expansion Initiative and the Novice Teacher Support Project (NTSP). Cari Klecka Renee T. Clift University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. What is e-mentoring?. Web-based conversations among new and experienced teachers.
E N D
Statewide Electronic Mentoring Expansion Initiative and the Novice Teacher Support Project(NTSP) Cari Klecka Renee T. Clift University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
What is e-mentoring? • Web-based conversations among new and experienced teachers. • Access to conversations controlled by an e-mentoring coordinator. • Top-level grouping of conversations controlled by an e-mentoring coordinator. • Lower level topics within conversations controlled by participants.
How E-mentoring Works in the NTSP • Training for e-mentors. • Initial and continuing face-to-face meetings with new and experienced teachers. • Group mentoring in grade levels monitored by facilitators and e-mentoring coordinator. • Presenter-led discussions tied to workshops. • Conversations added by request. • Discussions initiated by participants and stimulated by the curriculum for discussions.
What is the NTSP? • Focus on professional development • Focus on building a cross institutional community to support teaching and learning • UIUC • 2-Regional Offices of Education • Over twenty school districts • Website http://ntsp.ed.uiuc.edu
Why not traditional mentors? • Varying size of school districts • Twenty+ collective bargaining units • Desire to match for content area expertise • Promotion of ongoing dialogue among diverse viewpoints • Ease of access
E-Mentoring Advantages • Provides teachers who work in districts of widely varying sizes access to teachers who teach similar content or at the same grade level. • Facilitates multiple perspectives on shared practices in variety of contexts. • Provides a reasonably safe place for new teachers to share their concerns without fear of reprisal. • Allows mentoring to cross district boundaries.
What We Learned in the Pilot Year* • Technological expertise is distributed. • E-conferencing is more than hardware and software. • Online interaction devoid of face-to-face interaction is not be enough. • Initial face-to-face training is crucial. • Additional face-to-face meetings are helpful. *Details published in Klecka, C.L., Clift, R.T. & Thomas, A.S. (2002). Proceed with Caution: Introducing electronic conferencing in teacher education, Critical Issues in Teacher Education, 9, 28-36.
What We Have Learned Since the Pilot Year • People are interested in hearing the voice of an “expert” on specific issues. • Participants need an incentive to break traditional habits for seeking support and to overcome time constraints. • Even though e-mentors view their role as to help new teachers, they feel they are learning as much if not more than the new teachers. • Novice teachers are frequently peripheral participants. They read significantly more messages than they post.
Based on our experiences, how does one encourage meaningful participation? • Articulate clear goals, purposes, and expectations for participation. • Determine participants who will initiate discussions without disallowing initiation from others. • Establish an ever-changing curriculum for discussion. • Institute incentives and/or requirements to encourage participants to attend (at least one) face-to-face session(s) and to initially engage in conversations online. • Consider safety within the online context taking into account variables such as face-to-face meetings, the degree of anonymity, trust, and how participants can gain confidence in and through participation.
Cautions about Participation • Safety • The personal interacting with the medium • Mistakes/human error • Trust • That the time investment will pay off • Implicit trust in the intentions of online colleagues and the project • Confidence • Safety, trust, and confidence dependent on the degree of anonymity
Important questions to consider… • What is the purpose for using e-mentoring? • Who is the target audience? • What is the project infrastructure? • How is the support structure conceptualized? • Human • Technical
Our team/Your Team? • Currently at UIUC • Faculty advisor • Systems administrator • Project coordinator/ online moderator • In-house webmaster • Programmer • We are advising at least… • Project coordinator/online moderator • Technology coordinator • Project Advisor
Working together… • Create a timeline for development and implementation. • Create a conceptual roadmap beginning with goals, purposes, audience, etc… to site. structure, policies and procedures, etc… • Determine roles and responsibilities. • Create site. • Begin implementation. • Conduct ongoing internal evaluations.
Questions for us? • Renee T. Clift rtclift@uiuc.edu • Cari Klecka klecka@uiuc.edu