Self evaluation

1. Self evaluation Maurice Girvin

2. Self evaluation Navel gazing

3. Self evaluation Whole School Department Pupil Staff

4. Kirkland Rowell Survey • Staff (55) • Pupils (649) • Parents (458) • Staff Self evaluation Committee • Sharing good practice • Quality Assurance of Departmental Materials used for Self-evaluation Whole School – informing the S.D.P. • SMT Quality Assurance • Book Review • Pupil Planners • SEN • Routines • Website • Data Analysis • Benchmark Data • Baseline Data • Department • Teacher • Student • Value Added • BOG & SMT Quality Assurance • Examination Review • Target Setting and Action Planning • SOW

5. Department • Department Development plan • 3 year Departmental plan based upon the SDP • BOG & SMT Quality Assurance • Examination Review • Target Setting and Action Planning • SOW Review • PRSD • Focus for the last two years is on Self evaluation • Department Action Planning • 1 year Action Plan showing the outworking of the Departmental Development plan and the PRSD process.

6. PRSD 2012 – 2013 Objectives 1 & 2: • Self-evaluation process - report • Feedback for Improvement   2013 – 2014 Objectives 1 & 2: • Self-evaluation process - report • Differentiation in the Classroom

7. Self-evaluation process ‘Self-evaluation’ => Departmental ‘self-evaluation’ => Reflective practice at Departmental level. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ‘Feedback for Improvement’

8. Self-evaluation Process: ‘Feedback for Improvement’ What is first hand evidence? • Pupils’ Books • Lesson observation – “trusted colleague” • Questionnaires • Data. “Small steps properly managed can lead to large gains”

9. Obtaining the Evidence Pupils’ Books: • Do the pupils’ books include feedback for improvement? • Does the feedback within the pupils’ books aid understanding?

10. PRSD Lesson Observation: • Does the lesson concentrate on ‘Feedback for improvement’ when appropriate? • Are all pupils familiar with the concept of ‘feedback for improvement’ and use the feedback to improve their learning? • What strengths emerge from the lesson when feedback for improvement is evident? • What areas are there to develop within the lesson when using feedback for improvement?

11. PRSD - Use of Questionnaire Departmental Questions / Discussions: • What do you understand by the term ‘feedback for improvement’? • How often have you used ‘feedback for improvement’ within the classroom / homeworks etc? • What benefits have ‘feedback for improvement’ brought to your work in this subject? • Does ‘feedback for improvement’ always improve your work in this subject? • If you could add any key points to the process of ‘feedback for improvement’ in this subject, what would they be?

12. PRSD - Close the loop PRSD Objective one: Self-Evaluative Report Informs the: • Department Development Plan • Department Action Planning

13. Staff self evaluation • PRSD • All Staff contribute to the Departmental Self Evaluation report • Data • All Staff have access to Data about their students, department and their classes that is Benchmarked Department Self-evaluation Documents Departmental Development Plan, Department Action Plan, Departmental Target Setting and Results Analysis

14. Pupil self evaluation Target Setting: All students set individual targets based upon baseline testing Mock Results Day: All students complete a self evaluation sheet at their Mock results day Topic Self-evaluation: Students complete self-evaluation sheets at the end of each topic in most subjects Action Plan: All students categorised as underachieving are given action plans set by subject teachers, HOY or a member of SMT