1 / 11

Level of analysis / level of theoretical abstraction explaining outcomes by:

Level of analysis / level of theoretical abstraction explaining outcomes by:. Just story telling = history. But even history cannot avoid decisions on what is significant and what is not Individual leader Internal political system and their interactions /comparative politics

tal
Download Presentation

Level of analysis / level of theoretical abstraction explaining outcomes by:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Level of analysis / level of theoretical abstractionexplaining outcomes by: • Just story telling = history. But even history cannot avoid decisions on what is significant and what is not • Individual leader • Internal political system and their interactions /comparative politics • States as actors ( without looking into this “black box”) • Society of states ( = sum of the black boxes; “English School” ) • The global system as such with its proper dynamics ( “world system theory” egWallerstein )

  2. Should one use “panel studies” ( multi variant analysis) to deal with trends?? • Very common practice ( look at any of the major journals on international/global affairs ) • Drawbacks: problem of “n” • Problem of many variables including many unknown ones ( 200 reasons for the decline of Rome ) • Look at the trends as such • Only the long term counts: world wars did not make any significant changes

  3. The linear trend • Constant ( non accelerating ) growth of the sum • Eg: growth of the global surface under agricultural production • In real world rather rare ( most trends are non linear ) • Still most frequently used in correlation – analysis ( because it is simple mathematically ) • The use of correlation = does not equal causation. Nonetheless useful for “falsification”

  4. Non – linear; geometric • Eg: Malthus / Ehrlich (the population bomb = standing room only on earth ) • Is also rare in reality ( declining usefulness of a “genetic information” = warrior society: business model ) • At the upper end other reasons for slowdown

  5. The “organic” S - Curve • Most common form of a trend of both biological and social phenomena • Famous metaphor: water lilies on a pond • Population affected by HIV • Yield in relation to input of fertilizer • Ownership of cell – phones • Number of wealthy states as compared to number of democracies • Growth in the wealth of a single state

  6. S – Curves adding upeg: total “World GDP” • The inflection point and the era of slowing global economic growth is shifted into the future as the newcomers – like South Korea or now China – are growing faster than did the first “”modernizer “Great Britain 150 years ago

  7. The bell shaped curvethe rise and fall of everything • Examples • The relative power of states ( their share of power; whatever that is ) • Kuznets curve ( income inequality and “environmental Kuznets curve” ) • Number of children per fertile mother surviving until the age of five

  8. Ruptures; discontinuities • Examples • Population of Easter Islands • Number of towns with more than 5.000 inhabitants North of the Alps ( 10 AD– 600 AD ) • Complex systems between fragility and resilience

  9. The global warming “hockey – stick” • What happened at this inflection point?? • A new factor was added

  10. Two versions/ interpretations of the tool of “scenarios” • A) Projection into the future of current trends ( “surprise free scenarios”) • B) speculations on intrusion of new factors that might change the course • C) Note: social systems are self – reflective ( eg environmental “Kuznets Curve”; or disarmament )

More Related