1 / 17

Moog Components Group: Team 26

Moog Components Group: Team 26. Team Members: Andrew Adams, Jeff Janiak , Danny Sasso and Jae Oh Faculty Advisor: Dr. Shewchuk. Moog Components Group/Guardian. Formerly Poly-Scientific; Purchased by Moog in 2003 Headquartered in Blacksburg, Virginia

tala
Download Presentation

Moog Components Group: Team 26

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Moog Components Group: Team 26 Team Members: Andrew Adams, Jeff Janiak, Danny Sasso and Jae Oh Faculty Advisor: Dr. Shewchuk

  2. Moog Components Group/Guardian • Formerly Poly-Scientific; Purchased by Moog in 2003 • Headquartered in Blacksburg, Virginia • Designed to track and jam incoming ground based missiles

  3. Project Goals • Increase throughput • Improve operation efficiency • Improve on-time shipments

  4. Current Setup • 4 workers • Independent Cells • Component most complete has precedence

  5. Problem Statement • Running same setup for over 5 years • Continuous increase in demand • Challenge: To accommodate for the increases in demand and large amounts of overtime and inventory that have accumulated.

  6. Project ApproachData & Analysis • Process Times • Process Time Sheet • Employee Questioning • Scheduling Method • Process Steps • Production Sheet • Production Schedule • Put picture of Process sheet or Production Sheet

  7. Project ApproachDeliverable Decision • Rockwell Arena Simulation • Already used by MOOG • Will give client • Worker Utilization • Unit output quantity • Time in system • Client can customize • Worker Schedule • Weekly Production Amounts • Process times

  8. Project ApproachModel Creation & Examination • Created Current Setup • Performed Hypothesis Test • Created Alternative models • Reviewed output data and check financial viability • Put Hypothesis test calculation here

  9. Alternative Designs • Purchase of new equipment • Allows department to bypass largest contributor of time distribution • Considerable investment • Job shop • No costs involved • Job shop/New equipment setup • One queue for all workers • Additional worker • Simplest improvement • Quickest to implement

  10. Simulation Results • Purchase of new equipment • 25% increase in production • 87% worker utilization • Job Shop • 12.5% increase in production • 81% worker utilization • Job Shop/New equipment • 37.5% increase in production • 90% worker utilization • New hire or internal transfer • 31.25% increase in production • 69% worker utilization

  11. Recommended Alternative • Job Shop/New equipment

  12. Comparison • Current • 16 units/week • $104000 in revenue/week • 1580 avg. time in system • Equipment shared facility wide • Job Shop/New equip. • 22 units/week • $143000 in revenue/week • 1450 avg. time in system • Dedicated equipment

  13. Cost To Client

  14. Project Benefits • Increased production rates • Less WIP • Increased due date success • Allows for future growth

  15. Project Management • Weekly Team Meetings • Members assigned tasks to perform between meetings • Worked as teams on certain tasks

  16. Overview

  17. Summary & Acknowledgements • Instructor: Dr. Kleiner • Faculty Advisor: Dr. Shewchuk • Moog Contacts: Eric Alsup, Wiley Hagy • Moog production operators • Dr. Pasupathy & Susan Hunter for Arena consultation

More Related