1 / 4

Because of JH et. al., I’ve re-visited the fiducial cuts.

Because of JH et. al., I’ve re-visited the fiducial cuts. Eg. in the case of EHI-EHO (the most obvious example), in the past I used the x-projection and then found x-edges. Now, I make use of the y-projection to find y-edges. All runs with Igor’s Table 5. After. Before.

talbot
Download Presentation

Because of JH et. al., I’ve re-visited the fiducial cuts.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Because of JH et. al., I’ve re-visited the fiducial cuts. • Eg. in the case of EHI-EHO (the most obvious example), in the past I used the x-projection and then found x-edges. Now, I make use of the y-projection to find y-edges. All runs with Igor’s Table 5 After Before

  2. In case, there is a confusion, I show you the same plots without any fiducial cuts :

  3. WVU-WVD not so different … Before After

  4. -t vs  • Losing only ~0.3% (before vs after additional fiducial cuts are applied). Before After

More Related