School-Based Drug Prevention

1. School-Based Drug Prevention By: Jill Bassett, Caroline Creekmuir, Traci Hart, & Lauren Tower

2. School-Based Drug Prevention • Prevention • Refers to the strategies & processes that reduce, delay, or eliminate the probability of developing alcohol, tobacco, & drug use disorders. • Since most ATOD use begins before age 20, schools are the primary institution with access to this age group. Additionally, the most common prevention strategy has been education, which is compatible with schools’ goals.

3. School-Based Drug Prevention • Most inteventions are aimed at children & adolescents 10-16 years old (when most people start using). • Because the majority of youth experiment with substances (especially A & T), prevention needs to target all students. • Since risk factors are present years before use begins, prevention activities need to start in elementary school and be periodically reinforced as students grow and encounter new social situations & pressures. • Programs designed to meet developmental needs of students should be offered at each grade level without oversaturating students to the point they discount the information.

4. Preventative Interventions • Primary Interventions • Secondary Interventions • Three Categories of Interventions: • Universal • Selective • Indicated

5. Preventative Interventions • Ideally based on scientific knowledge about the prevalence of drug use in the target population, the age of first use, determinants of drug use, patterns of drug use, mental health problems in the past specific population, and a theoretical view of the intervention components that may change behavior.

6. Goals of Prevention Interventions • Increasing Knowledge About Drugs • Reducing the Risk of Drugs • Delaying the Onset of First Use • Reducing Abuse of Drugs • Minimizing the Harm Caused by the Use of Drugs

7. Key Elements of Effective School-Based Prevention Programs • Effects of Program Should Have Been Proven • Accurate & Developmentally Appropriate Info About Drugs • Interactive Delivery Methods • Social Influence Model • Normative Education • Social Skills Training • Teacher Training/Support

8. Key Elements of Effective School-Based Prevention Programs • Adequate Coverage of Material & Follow-Up • Culturally Sensitive Strategies • Broadening School-Based Activities to Include Families, Community, etc. • Methods of Evaluation

9. D.A.R.E.Drug Abuse Resistance Education • History of D.A.R.E. • Initially Founded in Los Angeles, 1983 • Improving America’s Schools Act 1994 • In the 1996 State of the Union Address, President Bill Clinton singled out D.A.R.E. for praise • Two years later, the National Institute of Justice presented it’s Report to the United States Congress and concluded that “D.A.R.E. does not work to reduce substance abuse.”

10. D.A.R.E. is… • Part of the “War on Drugs” • An international education program • The most widely used of all programs

11. Goals of D.A.R.E. • To humanize the police • To allow students to see officers in a helping role • To open lines of communication between law enforcement and youth • Have officers serve as educators

12. The Program • D.A.R.E. is designed to provide students with the skills and knowledge to avoid: • Substance use/abuse • Violence and gang involvement

13. About the Program • Ten week in-school curriculum • A police officer led series of classroom lessons that teaches children from kindergarten through twelfth grade • Those individuals that choose to lead the lessons are specially trained

14. D.A.R.E. America • National non-profit organization • Serves as a resource to communities, helping to establish and improve local D.A.R.E. programs • Provides officer training • Creates national awareness for D.A.R.E.

15. Criticisms • Ineffective • Opposite Effect • No Proof • D.A.R.E.’s research

16. Research • Mixed results throughout literature • Teaching styles and approach • Instructor Type (officer vs. teacher) • Long-term vs. Short-term results • Perceptions

17. Life-Skills Training:Overview • Research Validated Program • Elementary, Middle, H.S. Levels • Develops Skills and Confidence • Reduces Risk of Substance Use/Abuse

18. Life Skills Training • Skills to cope with peer pressure. • Improves self-esteem/confidence. • Coping with anxiety effectively. • Teaches immediate consequences of substance abuse. • Enhances behavioral and cognitive competence.

19. Components • Drug Resistance Skills • Personal Self-Management Skills • General Social Skills

20. Proven Effective With: • White middle-class students • Ethnic minority students • Inner-city urban populations • Suburban populations • Rural populations

21. Implementation • Settings • Teaching Strategies • Classroom Set-Up

22. Program Providers • To maximize effectiveness, choose wisely: • Provider • Setting

23. Classroom Program Providers • Teachers • School Counselors • Prevention Specialists • Health Professionals • Mental Health Professionals • Social Workers • Community Youth Educators • Law Enforcement Officers • Older Peer Leaders

25. Other Effective Drug Prevention Programs • Elementary School • Caring School Community Program: strengthens children’s sense of community (or connection to school). • Skills, Opportunity, & Recognition (SOAR): Enhances protective factors. • Brain Power! Junior Scientists Program: Teaches students about biological aspects of drug abuse.

26. Other Effective Drug Prevention Programs • Middle School • Lions-Quest Skills for Adolescence (SFA): Teaches cognitive-behavior skills. • Also used in high school. • Project ALERT: Focuses on substances that adolescents typically use first. • Project ALERT Plus for High School

27. Other Effective Drug Prevention Programs • Middle School cont’ • Project STAR: Targets schools, parents, community organizations, and health policymakers. • Mind Over Matter: Teaches biological effects of drug abuse on the body and brain.

28. Other Effective Drug Prevention Programs • Mentor Programs • Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America: The oldest and largest youth mentoring organization in the U.S. • Across Ages: Encourages elders mentoring youth, community service, life-skills, and family activities.

29. Designing Drug Use Prevention Programs • To effectively achieve the goal of preventing and reducing the use of gateway drugs: • Consider Risk Factors • Determine the Key Features Necessary for Successful Prevention Programs • Choose a Combination of Approaches (School-, Family-, and Community-Based)

31. Planning Process for Drug Prevention Programming • Assess Community Drug-Use Problems • Design Prevention Goals & Achievements • Develop Objectives or Anticipated Results • Identify Program Resources • Locate Funding Sources • Assign Leadership Tasks • Develop Implementation Strategies • Design Evaluation Protocol • Make Revisions That Will Improve the Program

32. Essential Strategies for Developing School-Based Prevention Programs • Build Effective Relationships with School & Community that Involve a School Leader • Involve School Personnel, Parents, Students, & Other Community Leaders in Planning • Develop Explicit Expectations • Recruit, Train, and Retain Well-Qualified Project Staff • Orient the School Staff, Parents, Students, & Community to the Project Goals • Select Curricula That Are Age, Gender, Developmentally, and Culturally Appropriate

33. Essential Strategies for Developing School-Based Prevention Programs • Recruit Students & Families With Assistance From School Personnel • Schedule Programs at Convenient Times • Become Familiar With Schools’ Culture • Promote Non-Drug Use Messages at School, Home, & in Community • Publicize Program • Provide Evaluation Feedback • Develop a Legacy of Prevention Activities • Use What Works, Get Rid of What Doesn’t Work

34. References • Bosworth, K. (1997). Drug abuse prevention: School-based strategies that work. Retrieved November 7, 2007 from http://www.ericdigests.org/1998- 1/drug.htm • Burke, M. (2002). School-based substance abuse prevention: Political finger-pointing does not work. Federal Probation, 66 (2), 66-71. • Cuijpers, P. (2003). Three decades of drug prevention research. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy, 10 (1), 7-20. • Des Jarlais, D.C., Sloboda, Z., & Friedman, S.R. (2006). Diffusion of the D.A.R.E. and syringe exchange programs. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1354-1357. • Donnermeyer, J.F. (1998). Educator perceptions of the D.A.R.E. officer. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 44, 1-17. • Drug Abuse Resistance Education (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2007 from http://www.dare.com/home/default.asp • Drug Abuse Resistance Education America (n.d.). National prevention study supports value of D.A.R.E. delivery network. Retrieved November 11, 2007 from http://www.dare.com

35. References • Gruber, C.A. (n.d.). Another positive evaluation of D.A.R.E. Retrieved November 11, 2007 from http://www.dare.com • Montoya, I.D., Atkinson, J., & McFaden, W.C. (2003). Best characteristics of adolescent gateway drug prevention programs. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 14 (2), 75-83. • NIDA (2003). Prevention drug abuse among children and adolescents, 2nd edition. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health. • NIDA develops drug prevention program for elementary students (2002). Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, Retrieved November 11, 2007. • SAMHSA (2004). Prevention pathways. Retrieved November 11, 2007 from http://www.preventionpathways.samhsa.gov/programs.htm • Zagumny, M.J. & Thompson, M.K. (1997). Does D.A.R.E. work? An evaluation in rural Tennessee. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 42, 32-41. • Zavela, K.J. (2002). Developing effective school-based drug abuse prevention programs. American Journal of Health & Behavior, 26 (4), 252-265.