1 / 15

Restructuring, Gender and Social Security Reform in Canada

Restructuring, Gender and Social Security Reform in Canada. Martha MacDonald. Major Changes to UI. Drop from 75% / 66% in 1971 to 55% / 50% today Increase entrance qualifications from 8 weeks to 12 – 20 weeks depending on unemployment rate in your region. Today based on hours worked.

taline
Download Presentation

Restructuring, Gender and Social Security Reform in Canada

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Restructuring, Gender and Social Security Reform in Canada Martha MacDonald

  2. Major Changes to UI • Drop from 75% / 66% in 1971 to 55% / 50% today • Increase entrance qualifications from 8 weeks to 12 – 20 weeks depending on unemployment rate in your region. • Today based on hours worked

  3. Other Changes • 1971 – Regional extended benefits, maternity, and federal contributions • 1977 – Developmental uses for UI • 1978 – Clawback and higher entrance requirements new entrants / re-entrants

  4. Other Changes • 1983 – Adoption benefits • 1990 – 10 weeks parental, penalties for quitters, increase developmental uses, and end federal contributions • 1996 – UI becomes EI, weeks to hours, penalties for repeat users, and no bens for quit or fired

  5. Changes to UI • In 1971 UI became a much more generous program and subsequent changes were designed to make it more like an insurance program and less like welfare. • With the more generous benefits after 1971 there was pressure to increase the entrance requirements, so the end result was a variable entrance requirement and duration based on the region’s unemployment rate.

  6. Changes to UI • UI was under constant revision to shorten the time job beneficiaries took to get back to work. • Federal contributions ended. • Despite the tightening of the program, Canada is more generous than the US. (20 weeks to qualify, 26 weeks benefits). • Changing to the US system was estimated to reduce income in the lowest quintile by 12%.

  7. Changes to UI • Suggestion of means-testing for families was rejected as being prejudicial but the clawback for personal income was passed. • Despite the change to hours (non-standard job friendly), the entitlement for women worsened after the 1996 changes to EI.

  8. Eligibility for Benefits • From weeks to hours – part time workers were now covered. • But the increase in hours makes it virtually impossible for non-standard employees to qualify. • A greater proportion of non-standard workers are female, biasing EI to males.

  9. Eligibility for Benefits • The change to hours reduces the employer incentive to hire part time employees to avoid paying EI premiums. • But it also encourages workers to have more than one non-standard job, supporting the principal of non-standard employment. • Seasonal workers would have trouble qualifying for EI with less than full time hours.

  10. Benefit Levels • Variable formula for calculating benefits. • The benefit rate starts at 55% but decreases for repeat users. • This is designed to target seasonal workers – argued by HRDC to be predominantly male. • But while the entrance is based on hours, benefits are calculated by weeks affecting non-standard (predominantly female) employees.

  11. Benefit Levels • Some people will benefit more by taking less work as it will reduce their average weekly wage and thus benefits. • There is a means test to improve the benefits for low income persons (against the insurance principle). • There is disagreement to whether this affects women positively or negatively.

  12. Length of Benefits • Length of benefits is based on weeks worked and the unemployment rate to a maximum of 50 weeks. • Thus part time employees could have longer durations but lower benefits than full time employees. • Benefits to female PT workers fell by 17% due to the new regulations.

  13. Premiums and Programs • Premiums were reduced, low income and small employers get a refund of premiums (full or partial). • The hourly system encourages job sharing. • 15% of EI expenditures can be used for self employment funding. • There is EI funding for non-EI clients.

  14. Summary of Impacts of EI • Full time long term employees will receive lower benefits under EI than UI. • Part timers with irregular hours could get less than before with the averaging over a fixed period of time. • High income earners are penalized by the clawback. • Seasonal workers are penalized by the intensity rule.

  15. Websites • http://www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/ae-ei/loi-law/eimar.shtml • http://www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca/ae-ei/employment_insurance.shtml

More Related