1 / 22

2012 NSS/MIC Anaheim

2012 NSS/MIC Anaheim. Questionnaire, Submissions and Registration Results & Analysis Dora Merelli – CIP & CEA/IRFU Patrick Le Dû – TNC & CNRS/IN2P3. REGISTRATION: number of attendees. Stabilized at around 2100 attendees.

talor
Download Presentation

2012 NSS/MIC Anaheim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2012 NSS/MIC Anaheim Questionnaire, Submissions and Registration Results & Analysis Dora Merelli – CIP & CEA/IRFU Patrick Le Dû – TNC & CNRS/IN2P3

  2. REGISTRATION: number of attendees Stabilized at around 2100 attendees

  3. Ratio between number of attendees and number of submissions attendees/submissions  around 1.2

  4. Transnational Attendees and Abstract Submission For country participants > 10 USA participants/abstracts : 904/595=1.52

  5. Evolution of Submission/Continent • America : 60 %  38% • Europe: 25%  42 % • Asia /Pacific: 10%  20% • Others: 2%

  6. Questionnaire Summary (789/2177) - Organization & Logistic

  7. Questionnaire Summary (789/2177) Scientific Program

  8. Somecomparisons over the years

  9. Somecomparisons over the years

  10. Best rating – (excellent+very good)>60% * = (Excellent + very good + good)

  11. Worst rating – (fair + poor) > 30% The Network Connectivity has slightly improved but is still a problem.

  12. Program

  13. Size, Quality, Topics

  14. Attendees Profile

  15. Other

  16. Comments – How to read the tables % of (Excellent + Very Good) Rating % of (Excellent + Very Good + Good) Rating % of (Fair + Poor) Rating

  17. Comments – NSS program

  18. Comments – MIC program

  19. Comments – RTSD Program and Joint Sessions

  20. Comments – Workshops and Events

  21. Comments – General

  22. Conclusions • Overall satisfaction is still very high = 93% • Conference attendance seems to be stabilized to around 2100 participants • Scientific quality of the program improving • No issues anymore with Poster Sessions • Still network problems (Wi-Fi)

More Related