1 / 27

Safety and Marine Environment Protection : Prospects We Face

Safety and Marine Environment Protection : Prospects We Face. Carien Droppers Deputy General Secretary Paris MOU on Port State Control. Overview:. Results of the Paris MoU activities and future prospects: Statistics (incl. BWG & RO performance)

tameka
Download Presentation

Safety and Marine Environment Protection : Prospects We Face

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Safety and Marine Environment Protection: Prospects We Face Carien Droppers Deputy General Secretary Paris MOU on Port State Control Paris MOU on Port State Control

  2. Overview: Results of the Paris MoU activities and future prospects: • Statistics (incl. BWG & RO performance) • Introduction of New Inspection Regime (NIR) in 2011

  3. Statistics

  4. Paris MoU results 2008 • Total inspections 24615 • No. deficiencies 83804 • No. individual ships insp. 15237 • Number of ships detained 1214 • Detained 4,93% • of which 14.2% RO related detentions • No. ships refused access 19

  5. Black list 2008 (2006-2008)

  6. (Top of) White list 2008 (2006-2008)

  7. RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)

  8. (Top of) RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)

  9. Number of inspections

  10. Number of deficiencies observed

  11. Number of detentions

  12. Detention % of inspection

  13. Detention % per ship type

  14. Concentrated Inspection Campaigns • 2009: CIC on lifeboat launching appliances (Sep – Nov) Checklist on web site • 2010: CIC on tanker damage stability (oil and chemical tankers, gas carriers) • 2011: CIC on structural safety and Load Line Convention Paris MOU on Port State Control

  15. MORE FACTS AND FIGURES, ANNUAL REPORTS

  16. Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC NIRNewInspectionRegime Directive on PSC Directive on Ropax Paris MoU Task Force 31 EMSA Leader TEG, MAB, PSCC EP, Council, COM

  17. 2009/16/EC 95/21/EC 2009 2010 2011 2012 Startup of Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC NIR MoU 32nd Amendment • Detentions on all Ship Types • Detentions on Grey List Flags EC Dir 2009/16 OJ Publication28/05/2009 Enter in force+20 days Application01/01/2011 3 yrs after enter in force17/06/2012 • START APPLYING (Considering < 3 yrs) • START COLLECTING • Banning Full implementation with no restrictions • Company performance • RO performance • Ships Risk Profile (PI and PII) • Regional Commitment • MS Fair Share

  18. NIR consequences Improved targetingRisk based targeting Less flexibility for MS in selecting ships for inspectionSRP, PI and PII, Overriding Factors, Unexpected Factors Regional commitments vs national commitmentsFair Share, Postponement Further refusal of access provisionsBanning, All ship types Benchmarking of Flags, RO’s and CompaniesInspection Intervals, Company and ROs Performance Widened scope from ports to ports and anchoragesFull coverage of ships visiting Paris MoU region

  19. NIR: Ship Risk Profile • Generic Factors • Type of Ship • Flag • RO • Company • Historical Factors • Deficiencies • Detentions HRS– High Risk Ship SRS– Standard Risk Ship LRS– Low Risk Ships (SRP is recalculated on a daily basis)

  20. HRS = 5 points * LRS = all criteria * SRS = not HRS or LRS

  21. Only possible if no banning of any of the ships in last 36 months Company performance Company Performance Formula: • Taking into account detention and deficiency history of all ships in the (ISM) company’s fleet • Calculated daily over a 36 month period • ISM deficiencies 5 points. Others 1 point • Refusal of access (banning): above average detention index • Performance: high, medium, low, very low Paris MOU on Port State Control

  22. NIR: SRP Inspections Intervals HRS 5th to 6thmonth SRS 10th to 12thmonth LRS 24th to 36thmonth Inspection Window

  23. NIR: Inspection Priority Priority II Ship may be inspected Inspection Window ... MS still may inspect outside the regime! Timeline for any Ship Risk Profile If not inspected within Window, ship becomes Priority I Ship must be inspected Priority I Overriding Factors But… Unexpected Factors Priority II

  24. NIR: Refusal of Access (Banning) Detained 3 or more times Detained 3 or more times 36 months 24 months 12 months Today • Jump detentions • Fail to call to agreed repair yard OR…

  25. Multiple Banning (Example for Black Flag, for Grey Flag is 2 yrs) 3yrs D D D D D D 3yrs Ban Ban Ban Permanent Ban Ship Banned 1st timeafter 3 detentionsin 3 years Ship Banned 2nd time after 3 detentions in 3 years Ship Banned 3rd time if detained Permanent Banned if detained Ban can be lifted after 24 months if: • White Flag • EU RO • HP Company Or Permanent Ban Ban can be lifted after 3 months Ban can be lifted after 12 months

  26. Reporting Obligations 72H Before ETA if eligible for Expanded Inspection 24H Before ETA for every ship ATA and ATD within a reasonable time

  27. Contact • Secretariat of the Paris MoU on Port State Control P.O.Box 90653 2509 LR The Hague The Netherlands • www.parismou.org • secretariat@parismou.org

More Related