1 / 26

Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Corn Observation 2014 - Figaro

Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Corn Observation 2014 - Figaro. 42 0 12'20.26" N 24 0 48'41.42" E. Observation targets:. 1. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigation layout (laterals distance).

Download Presentation

Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Corn Observation 2014 - Figaro

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Plovdiv, Bulgaria, Corn Observation 2014 - Figaro 42012'20.26" N 24048'41.42" E

  2. Observation targets: 1. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigation layout (laterals distance) 2. Determination of the irrigation scheduling by crop consumption and soil moisture sensing. 3. Raising Corn as a second crop after wheat, without conventional tillage, using strip tillage as alternative till in order to save energy, and water stored in the soil.

  3. Treatments Precipitation and Evaporation (mm), months 7-10.2014

  4. Evaporation and Precipitation Data, 7- 10/2014

  5. Irrigation Data (mm) according to the shift, 2014

  6. Plovdiv observation Silage yield (Ton/Ha) Plovdiv observation grain yield (Ton/Ha)

  7. Genas, France, Corn Observation 2014 - Figaro The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different irrigation systems: (rain-gun, SDI and surface drip), and to test the implementation of Aqua-crop in maize production

  8. plots (treatments) description Precipitation and Evaporation (mm), months 1-12.2014 (max per day, quantity per month and year accumulation), location: Lyon-St Exupery,

  9. ETo values for 03-12/2014 compare to Average ETo (2002-2013). Water quantity and irrigation interval

  10. Accumulation of GDD for perennial average (average 1981-2010) and 2014

  11. Grain Yield (Ton/Ha), machine harvest Grain Yield (Ton/Ha), manual harvest

  12. The Influence of the Irrigation Regime on Cotton Production in the Upper Galilee The main objectives of this research were to (a) evaluate the response of seed cotton yield to different water regimes; (b) determine the appropriate irrigation practice towards the end of the season.

  13. Treatments: Commercial Irrigation regime (daily irrigation), sharp irrigation reduction after the first open boll appeared. Commercial Irrigation regime (daily irrigation), Moderate irrigation reduction after the first open boll appeared. Stress irrigation regime during the vegetation period, normal irrigation starting with squares appearance, Simulation with Aqua-Crop.

  14. Minimum temperature data for January – September (2012, 2013 and 2014) Maximum temperature data for January – September (2012, 2013 and 2014)

  15. Radiation data for January – September (2012, 2013 and 2014)

  16. Precipitation quantities (Sept. 2013 – April 2014)

  17. Average evaporation (mm/day), Total monthly evaporation (mm), irrigation quantity (mm), irrigation number, crop coefficient

  18. Water quantity per Irrigation (mm)

  19. Accumulation of GDD for perennial average (10 years) and 2014.

  20. Quantity and Quality parameters of the cotton Yield GR/L- Quality, LENG- Fiber length, UN- Length Uniformity, STR- strength, EL- Elongation, MIC- Micronaire, Rd- Degree of reflectance,+ b- Yellowness, MAT – Maturity, SFC – Short Fiber Content, MST – Moisture

  21. Gvaot-HaHorish observation/Figaro project 2014

  22. Commercial irrigation refer to the local custom of the irrigation, Semi-Automation refer to irrigation activation by constant irrigation quantity (determine by ETo*Kc), and monitoring this regime by soil moisture sensors. Irrigation monitoring: Each plot consists of two tensiometers stations, each station with 3 tensiometers: 1. Between two drippers, 0.05 m from the drip lateral (Horizontal, depth 0.3 m. 2. Between two drippers, 0.30 m from the drip lateral (Horizontal), depth 0.3 m. 3. Between two drippers, 0.05 m from the drip lateral (Horizontal, depth 0.6 m. The idea is to monitor the wetted area, with most of the active root zone.

  23. Commercial irrigation scheduling, Plot 05 West, 2014

  24. Semi-Automation irrigation scheduling, Plot 05 East, 2014.

More Related