1 / 18

Leverage or Power In Negotiation Preliminary Considerations

Leverage or Power In Negotiation Preliminary Considerations. What are power and influence? Power : Source of direct or indirect pressure exerted to advocate interests or win conflict Influence : Tactics to apply this pressure Why is power important to negotiators?

tana
Download Presentation

Leverage or Power In Negotiation Preliminary Considerations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Leverage or Power In NegotiationPreliminary Considerations • What are power and influence? • Power: Source of direct or indirect pressure exerted to advocate interests or win conflict • Influence: Tactics to apply this pressure • Why is power important to negotiators? • Provides advantage or leverage to gain greater share of outcomes or preferred solution • Usually sought for one of two reasons: • Equalization: To counterbalance opponent power • Enhancement: To secure desired outcomes, to win

  2. Power In NegotiationPreliminary Considerations, contd • Defining power • Simple definition: Ability to bring about desired outcomes (in face of resistance) • Alternative definition: Ability to satisfy purposes in a situation relative to that situation • Relational aspect is important • Not simply a characteristic of an actor or party • Stresses how one derives power from a situation or context • Definition leads to emphasis on sources of power

  3. Sources Of PowerInformation and Expert Power • Information • Facts, evidence, viewpoints, data • Used to persuade the other to accept a particular view (perhaps a particular frame), solution • Expert power • Special case of info power -- person assumes importance apart from info • Interprets facts for us, makes them persuasive • Watch out for the “snow job” -- a variation of “good guy/bad guy”?

  4. Sources Of PowerResource Control: “Whoever has the gold …” • Money: Cash, salary, bonuses, expenses, etc. • Supplies: Raw materials, parts, components • Time: If the opponent is under time pressure • Equipment: Tools, software, vehicles, etc. • Critical services: Installation, maintenance, technical support, transportation, training, etc. • Human capital: Labor, staff • Interpersonal support: Praise and encouragement, or criticism for bad performance

  5. Sources Of PowerLegitimate Power • Authority is usually derived from the social structure (e.g., organizational position, one’s place in the hierarchy or network). Can be obtained through inheritance (tradition), election, or appointment • Derivative sources: Reputation based on past performance enhances formal authority. Conversely, people stop listening to ineffective authorities

  6. Sources Of PowerInformal Authority • Derives from one’s place in the structure or network even without formal authority • Key characteristics lending informal authority • Centrality: Amount of information passing through the “node” • Criticality and relevance: The key info and its processing • Flexibility: Discretion they can exercise • Visibility: Is the function known to others?

  7. Sources Of PowerPersonal Power • Credibility: Qualifications and expertise, trustworthiness and integrity, presence • Personal attractiveness (friendliness): Establishes personal relationship, showing warmth, empathy • Emotion: Appealing to passions, values, sense of what’s right • Persistence and tenacity: “Dogged determination” -- children are good at this!

  8. Managing Information Power: The Persuasion Process • Traditional model emphasizes characteristics of the message, source (sender), and receiver • More recent model emphasizes two paths: • Central route: Conscious, cognitive (integrated with existing thought structures), e.g., “Our cell-phone service is useful if your car breaks down” • Peripheral route: More subtle, less conscious, less permanent as not integrated in thought structures, “Jamie Lee Curtis wants to party with you/Women are mechanically competent”

  9. Characteristics of Messages: Three Main Issues • Content: Facts and topics to be covered, the “what” to be communicated • Structure: How the message is constructed, or form • Persuasive Style: How the message is delivered

  10. Message Content: Making It Persuasive • Make the offer attractive: What do they gain? Defuse their objections in advance • Frame it for a “yes”: One yes leads to another (build cooperative and agreeable spirit) • Make it normative: People want to do “the right thing.” Make agreement the right thing that should be done. Even just saying it is helps! • Suggest agreement in principle as an interim step

  11. Structuring The Message For Persuasion • Order: Not in the middle. Primacy and recency effects • Attractive, familiar, controversial messages at beginning • Uninteresting, unfamiliar, unimportant to receiver at end • Two-sided message: Recognize alternate view and preempt it in advance (I.e., anticipate objections) • Big ideas may be more digestible in small doses, especially if parts are known to be “tasty” (or previously accepted) • Repetition. Repetition. • Conclusions: Most effective if they’ve drawn them. Can you count on that? If so, leave it “open.”

  12. Persuasive Style: How To Pitch The Message • Encourage active participation • Use metaphors, with due caution • Incite fears, possibly with threats • Create distractions to absorb energy they normally devote to building counter-arguments • Use more intense language, but there’s an optimal level that’s not always the most intense • Violate receiver’s expectations

  13. Credibility Qualifications and competence Trustworthiness Self-presentation or presence Composure Sociability (friendly and open) Extroversion Personal attractiveness Friendliness: Establish personal relations (Ingratiation: Excess flattery, taking friendliness a bit too far?) Strategies: Compliments Attractiveness Helping the other Perceived similarity Emotion Characteristics of Sources

  14. Receiver Characteristics • Attending to the other • Eye contact • Body position • Other nonverbal cues • Exploring or ignoring the other’s position • Selectively paraphrase • Reinforce points you like in their position • Resisting the other’s influence • Develop your BATNA • Public commitments • Inoculation against their arguments

  15. Context FactorsCompliance Strategies • Strategies used to gain compliance • Reciprocity - normally expected in concessions • Commitment - let them sample, try it on, borrow it • Social proof - we look to others to guide us, e.g., celebrities, stars • Use of reward and punishment, or threats involving these (pressure tactics) • Scarcity - offer something unique and rare • These can be used to manipulate or deceive • We resent such use on us. Should we use them? • Stay tuned for chapter on ethics

  16. Application of PowerStrategies of Influence • Persuasion: Using info and expertise • Exchange: Resources, “quid pro quo” • Legitimacy: Position in authority structure • Friendliness and ingratiation • Friendliness: Developing a relationship, showing support, concern, liking, appreciation, respect • Ingratiation: “Expedient friendliness” is often resented, but some can use it effectively • Praise or verbal reinforcement

  17. Application of PowerStrategies of Influence, continued • Assertiveness: Strong, forceful style and manner • Inspirational appeal: Info with an emotional message and a vision of the future • Consultation (“ACBD”) -- Redundant? • Pressure: Using strategic info plus sanctions • Tends to be used by parties high in power, but also as a response by less powerful to power … escalation? • Short-term compliance, but alienates the other • Coalitions: Endorsement or coordinated use of other influence tactics

  18. Power In Negotiation -- Summary • It’s important to negotiators for different reasons, depending on their intent • To neutralize a power disadvantage • To gain a competitive advantage • Power is perhaps best understood in terms of its sources • Various influence strategies can be used, separately or in combination, to apply power or exert leverage

More Related