1 / 25

Mitigating HIV/AIDS Impact on Education Systems: Planning and Management Checklist

Mitigating HIV/AIDS Impact on Education Systems: Planning and Management Checklist. Peter Badcock-Walters MTT 2004 Winter School Sica’s Conference Centre, Durban 10 August 2004 Funded and Supported by USAID. Background.

tana
Download Presentation

Mitigating HIV/AIDS Impact on Education Systems: Planning and Management Checklist

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mitigating HIV/AIDS Impact on Education Systems:Planning and Management Checklist Peter Badcock-Walters MTT 2004 Winter School Sica’s Conference Centre, Durban 10 August 2004 Funded and Supported by USAID

  2. Background • Growing acknowledgement that HIV/AIDS is a systemic management problem for education and that response must: • be located within the system at every level, and • address issues of prevention, treatment, care and support and mitigation – including workplace issues and response management; • Many MoEs have initiated response but often limited to prevention, treatment and care, without attention to sector policy or comprehensive planning and management; • Need for a flexible strategic response framework to guide such policy and action plan development and a checklist of issues requiring attention.

  3. Key Points of Departure • HIV/AIDS is a development issue and one of the largest management challenges facing education; • The primary impact of HIV/AIDS is to increase the scale of existing systemic and management problems in education; • Lack of reliable data makes it difficult to know where ‘routine’ system problems stop and HIV/AIDS systemic erosion starts; • Attrition, service ratios, enrolment, drop-out and transition rates, quality, output and budgeting will all be adversely affected.

  4. Key Themes • Growing understanding that a comprehensive response is required which addresses three key themes: • Prevention • Treatment, Care and Support • Mitigation: a) Workplace issues b) Management of the response • MoEs have also recognised that HIV/AIDS response must be sustainable over the long term and must: • Be integrated into every level of the education management system and involve all sectoral partners, and • Be within the means of the recurrent education budget, irrespective of short-term donor or other funding.

  5. Systemic Problem & Response • Increasing systemic erosion and linked management problems will compromise ability to meet EFA, UNGASS and other international goals • Necessary to move planning beyond narrow sectoral focus on prevention, treatment, care and support, and accepts HIV/AIDS as long-term, sector-wide management problem; • Systemic response requires comprehensive, prioritized plan of action, from assessment and sector policy development, to decentralised planning and implementation; • Must be based on dependable data, monitoring, evaluation and regular review.

  6. AIDS: Opportunity in Crisis • In every aspect of planning and management, it should be remembered that while HIV/AIDS is a long-term human and development catastrophe, it is also a unique opportunity to address any number of long-standing problems in the structure and function of education; • In every step of the mitigation response we should be asking ourselves what opportunities this action provides for concomitant system improvement or reform; • Planners and managers mustproactively look for system reform synergies and promote them.

  7. Strategic Response Framework • Need for Strategic Response Framework (SRF) to contextualize and locate systemic response; • SRF flexibility required to accommodate country system diversity and recognize progress made in planning/initiating sector HIV/AIDS programs; • Spans 3 development phases, which include: • Understanding Impact (assessing, benchmarking and measuring impact); • Planning Mitigation (action planning and costing prioritized activities required to mitigate impact); • Implementation, Monitoring & Review (initiating and implementing planned activity, monitoring progress and reporting outcomes and response).

  8. Planning & Management Checklist: • SRF provides the ‘big picture’ within which a comprehensive checklist of action phases and steps can be located; • Allows MoEs to recognize achievements as well as missing or incomplete activities to date, and plan rationally for the future; • Checklist of steps can be customized to MoE requirements to prioritize strategically important steps and need not be sequential; • Resultant framework and checklist of steps meets donor need for prioritized and achievable plans, implementation, monitoring and reporting; • 3 Phases and 12 steps include:

  9. Phase One:Understanding Impact • STEP ONE:HIV/AIDS Situation Analysis, Response Review and Impact Assessment– • Identify and agree key HIV/AIDS impact and vulnerability indicators; • Develop objectives and TOR for impact assessment/activity review; • Commission independent sector impact assessment/activity review; or • Undertake interactive rapid sector appraisal/activity review; • Consider findings and establish impact and activity benchmarks.

  10. Phase One:Understanding Impact • STEP TWO: Management Information and Research Review– • Review MoE data history, quality and reliability; • Review and audit data systems/capacity, including collection, access to HIV/AIDS impact indicators, analysis and decision support systems; • Review other sector data/information sources; • Review education sector research agendas inside and outside MoE; • Aggregate all available data/information to provide single consolidated source and develop preliminary proposals for system reform and extension; • Develop national, prioritized research agenda.

  11. Phase One:Understanding Impact • STEP THREE: Education Sector HIV/AIDS Policy and Regulation Audit – • Review national HIV/AIDS policy framework and implications for education sector policy development; • Review education sector HIV/AIDS policy where it exists, and check coverage of Prevention, Treatment, Care and Support and Mitigation, including workplace and management issues; • Review/audit relevant MoE legal procedures and regulations and identify shortcomings and issues for policy review; • Advocate to create ‘champions’ for education sector HIV/AIDS policy development and dissemination.

  12. Phase One:Understanding Impact • STEP FOUR: Education Sector Capacity Audit – • Review national and sub-national MoE systems and HR capacity at all levels to respond to and manage HIV/AIDS impact; • Review education sector capacity and program coverage, cooperation agreements and protocols with national and international development partners; • Identify and estimate financial resource availability to support HIV/AIDS response and agree access and other protocols; • Integrate capacity audit, impact assessment/sector appraisal, data and policy information to provide strategic overview for decision-making.

  13. Phase Two: Planning Mitigation • STEP FIVE: Establish HIV/AIDS Management Unit (HAMU) – • Identify education sector needs for full time coordination structure (HAMU) through policy development and strategic planning process; • Develop sectoral agreement on national and sub-national form, function, structure and commitment of permanent/dedicated HAMU; • Establish HAMU with appropriately high levels of access and reporting; • Commit to adequate capital and recurrent resources to equip and sustain HAMU in long-term; • Ensure commitment and access to appropriate, regular training and support for HAMU personnel.

  14. Phase Two: Planning Mitigation • STEP SIX: Education Sector HIV/AIDS Policy Development – • Agree guiding principles, goals and objectives for adaptive education sector HIV/AIDS policy; • Develop draft education sector HIV/AIDS policy in accordance with agreed principles and national/ international policy frameworks and guidelines; • Address key policy themes of Prevention, Treatment, Care and Support and Mitigation, with special attention to workplace issues and managing the response; • Agree and entrench process for regular policy review and adaptation based on implementation experience at national and decentralized levels.

  15. Phase Two: Planning Mitigation • STEP SEVEN: National HIV/AIDS Policy Implementation Planning – • Develop prioritised HIV/AIDS policy implementation planning framework by goal and objective; • Segment plan by policy theme to cover Prevention, Treatment, care and Support and Mitigation; • Address legal issues and development of enforceable regulations to give effect to policy implementation; • Ensure planning framework includes: • capacity building for effective HIV/AIDS response at all levels of the system; • system review and reform to improve functional efficiency.

  16. Phase Two: Planning Mitigation • STEP EIGHT: Decentralized HIV/AIDS Policy Implementation Planning – • Locate sub-national planning within national implementation planning principles and framework; • Develop specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-bound plans for sub-national levels reflecting regional variance, needs and priorities; • Address reality check of regional/district constraints and difficulties and factor these in planning; • Consolidate decentralized plans to update and strengthen national education sector framework.

  17. Phase Two: Planning Mitigation • STEP NINE: Implementation Budgeting and Resource Development – • Cost national/sub-national implementation plans over 5 years, with defensible assumptions; • Analyze MoE capital and recurrent budget availability and confirm access protocols; • Confirm external/donor resource availability; • Develop partnership and program delivery database to support coordination and identify available country TA capacity; • Hold donor conference to present comprehensive, costed education sector HIV/AIDS policy implementation plan to mobilize external resources.

  18. Phase Three: Implementation, Monitoring & Review • STEP TEN: Monitoring and Evaluation – • Monitor quantitative implementation of policy at all levels, against agreed target dates and outputs; • Monitor HIV/AIDS impact indicators via national and sub-national data capture and analysis; • Monitor system and sector capacity in relation to observed management and delivery; • Establish and evaluate qualitative indicators of policy implementation success against agreed targets and outputs; • Design and introduce M&E and supplementary data capture systems to support this activity.

  19. Phase Three: Implementation, Monitoring & Review • STEP ELEVEN: Reporting – • Report progress/outcomes of education sector HIV/AIDS policy implementation at agreed intervals to all national and international constituencies, stakeholders and development partners.

  20. Phase Three: Implementation, Monitoring & Review • STEP TWELVE: PolicyImplementation Review – • Convene inclusive annual HIV/AIDS policy and implementation strategy review and report progress, performance and vulnerability assessment; • Revise/adapt national and sub-national strategies and implementation activities, based on impact indicators, implementation monitoring, evaluation and reporting; • Develop/publish revised implementation plans for the following year, based on review/adaptation of revised targets, priorities and goals; • Assure education stakeholders/development partners of effective M&E and implementation planning.

  21. MTT Support Tools • A Resource Kit of ‘tools’ has been developed to support this 12-step process; • Ownership of this, with training, is transferred to the MoE and its sector partners. Includes: • Rapid Appraisal Framework/Assessment TORs • Data Analysis Criteria and HIV/AIDS Impact Indicators • Policy Development Framework/Country Samples • Prioritised Implementation Planning Templates • Budget Planning & Implementation Costing Tools • Partnership/Program Database Template • District Education Management & Monitoring Information Systems (DEMMIS) • Monitoring and Evaluation Options • Educator Mortality/Attrition Research Models & Templates • Educator Demand & Supply Modelling

  22. Summary • No MoE has completed every one of these steps but several have made great strides and serve as international exemplars of good practice; • Issue is recognition of what could and should be done and prioritization of these activities to suit local conditions and resource constraints; • Checklist should guide planning, confirm commitment to EFA & mobilize donor support; • MoEs committed to action must establish full-time coordinating and management structures to roll-out and monitor HIV/AIDS mitigation plans; • Regular monitoring & review means that response will require continuous coordination and be a routine, day-to-day activity of every manager.

  23. Exercise 1: Checklist Review • 30 minutes: No presentation required at this point; • Method: Break into country groups & use Checklist to review your MoE accomplishments to date; • Against each item, put a tick if you collectively feel that the step has been comprehensively dealt with and is complete; • If not, estimate the % achievement against each item – in other words, if your MoE is half-way to completing this step, put 50% in the column; • On completion, put Checklist in your file to use as a point of reference throughout the course.

  24. Exercise 2: Using the Checklist • 30 minutes: 3 selected groups will have 5 mins each to present 5-point plan for strategic use of the Checklist and its likely impact on MoE decision-makers; • Method: In country groups, consider strategic use of this Checklist within MoE to alert decision makers to need for comprehensive approach & identify issues yet to be tackled; • Also consider what affect this might have and how you might capitalize on this to advance the mitigation agenda.

  25. Mitigating HIV/AIDS Impact on Education SystemsPlanning and Management Checklist WEBSITE: www.mttaids.com CONTACT: peterbw@eastcoast.co.za

More Related