1 / 24

System Design Review Project Team 13453

System Design Review Project Team 13453. Brandon Niescier Erin Sullivan Mike Gorevski Sean Deshaies. Agenda. Team and Project Introduction (5 min) Customer Needs and Specifications (5 min) Concept Generation (5 min) Concept Selection (10 min) Risk Assessment (5 min)

tanika
Download Presentation

System Design Review Project Team 13453

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. System Design ReviewProject Team 13453 Brandon Niescier Erin Sullivan Mike Gorevski Sean Deshaies

  2. Agenda • Team and Project Introduction (5 min) • Customer Needs and Specifications (5 min) • Concept Generation (5 min) • Concept Selection (10 min) • Risk Assessment (5 min) • Project Plan (5 min) • Q&A

  3. Team and Project Members TEAM: Project Manager: Sean Deshaies (ME) Project Engineers: Brandon Niescier (ME) Erin Sullivan (EE) Mike Gorevski (EE) CUSTOMER: Dr. Jason Kolodziej, ME Department, RIT SUPPORT: Project Guide: Bill Nowak (Xerox) Faculty Champion: Dr. Jason Kolodziej(RIT) Sponsors: Scott Delmotte (D-R)

  4. Project Description and Objective The purpose of this project is to monitor the health of the main crank bearing on RIT’s Dresser-Rand ESH-1 compressor. This will be done through recording vibration measurements via wireless sensor technology.

  5. Previous Work • Team 12453 installed a range of sensors on the compressor and expanded the capabilities of the data acquisition (DAQ) system

  6. Customer Needs

  7. Customer Specifications

  8. House of Quality Relationships: 9 = Strong 3 = Moderate 1 = Weak 0 or Blank = No Relationship Importance Rating: 1 = Low Importance 3 = Moderate Importance 9 = High Importance

  9. Pareto Chart

  10. Functional Decomposition

  11. Concept Development

  12. Drill and Tap Hole Affix With Wax Concepts Weld It Glue It Criteria D A T U M Secure Fit - - + Resist Maximum Operating Temperature - - + Oil Resistant S - S Vibration Resistant - - + Ease of Removal - + - Clarity of Vibration Measurement - + S Ease of Installation + + - Life Expectancy - - S Ease of Maintenance - - - Total + 1 3 3 Total - 7 6 3 Total S 1 0 3 Pugh Chart for Mounting Sensor Inside Housing • Drill and Tap is chosen method • Glue and Wax clearly eliminated • Weld eliminated due to difficultly with maintenance

  13. Placement of Sensor Inside Housing

  14. Drill and Tap Hole Affix With Wax Concepts Weld It Glue It Criteria Secure Fit (Relative to Rotational Force) - - + Oil Resistant S - S Vibration Resistant - - + Clarity of Vibration Measurment - + S Ease of Removal - + - Ease of Installation + + - Life Expectancy - - S Ease of Maintenance - - - Total + 1 3 2 Total - 6 5 3 Total S 1 0 3 Pugh Chart for Mounting Sensor on Shaft • Drill and Tap is the chosen method • Glue and Wax are clearly inferior options • Welding is roughly on par • However, welding is not practical

  15. Rotational Mounting Location

  16. Use Proprietary RF Network Use Dissimilar Data Channel Use Bluetooth Use Induction Use Zigbee Concepts Use WiFi Criteria Loss of Signal Through Housing Loss of Signal Through Housing S S S S S Power Consumption - - - - S Complexity of Implementation - - - - S Potential for Interferance in Environment S S S S S Cost of Implementation - - - - S Continuity of Signal S S S + S Ease of Maintance S - - S S Life Expectancy + - - + S Total + 1 0 0 2 0 Total - 3 5 5 3 0 Total S 4 3 3 3 8 Pugh Chart for Transmitting Signal From a Stationary Source • Proprietary RF Network was chosen method • The customer has requested a wired sensor to be implemented as well to verify data • Based on the simplicity of our sensor network

  17. Use Proprietary RF Network Use Slip Ring Method Use Bluetooth Use Induction Use Zigbee Concepts Use WiFi Criteria Power Required Power Required - S S + S Simplicity of Technology - - - - S Potential for Interferance in Environment S S S + S Cost of Implementation - - - - S Continuity of Signal S S S S S Ease of Maintance - S S - S Life Expectancy - S S - S Total + 0 0 0 2 0 Total - 5 2 2 4 0 Total S 2 5 5 1 7 Pugh Chart for Transmitting a Signal From a Rotational Source • Proprietary RF Network was chosen method • Based on the simplicity of our sensor network

  18. System Block Diagram • Option 1: Commercial Off The Shelf • Option 2: Develop In-House with PCB Mounted Accelerometer • Option 3: Develop In-House with Commercial Accelerometer Option 3 was chosen due to expert reccommedation

  19. Risk Assessment

  20. Risk Assessment (cont.)

  21. Test Rig • In order to validate the wireless signal transmission on the rotating shaft, a model test facility will be constructed • 1:1 scale for shaft diameter and rotational speed • Bearing configuration will not be identical to actual compressor for the sake of simplicity

  22. Test Rig Model Power Supply Coupling Encoder Motor

  23. Gantt Chart Through MSD I

  24. Questions

More Related