190 likes | 324 Views
A&IS/CAP/DNC Report. Russell Guthrie Executive Director, Quality and Member Relations. IESBA Meeting. New York City, New York. February 17, 2009. Topics to be Covered. What we know today Adoption and Implementation Support Compliance Program Status Developing Nations initiatives
E N D
A&IS/CAP/DNC Report Russell Guthrie Executive Director, Quality and Member Relations IESBA Meeting New York City, New York February 17, 2009
Topics to be Covered • What we know today • Adoption and Implementation Support • Compliance Program • Status • Developing Nations initiatives • Specific matters for IESBA consideration • Adoption and Implementation • SMO Revisions
Developing Nations Committee Challenges • Lack of stakeholder engagement • Outdated legal frameworks • Weak accountancy professional organizations • Widespread non-compliance with standards • Weak monitoring/enforcement mechanisms • Lack of access to (translated) international standards and related implementation guidance • Inadequate training and curricula/poor linkage with academia Weak Capacity
Adoption and Implementation Support IFAC – Beyond Standard Setting • Adoption • Advocacy • Policy Advice
Adoption and Implementation Support IFAC – Beyond Standard Setting • Implementation Support • Availability • Accessibility (Translations) • Application Support • Core Training and Education Materials (currently deferred due to resource constraints)
Member Body Compliance Program Statements of Membership Obligations (SMOs) • SMO 1 Quality Assurance • SMO 2 International Education Standards • SMO 3 International Standards on Auditing • SMO 4 International Code of Ethics • SMO 5 International Public Sector Accounting Standards • SMO 6 Investigation and Discipline • SMO 7 International Financial Reporting Standards
Member Body Compliance Program Assessing Compliance • Part 1 – Fact-based questionnaire on the regulatory and standard-setting framework in a member’s home country • Part 2 – Self-assessment of compliance with specific requirements of the SMOs • Part 3 – Members and associates develop action plans to address gaps
Member Body Compliance Program Status of Preparation of Action Plans as of February 1, 2010 • 76 – Published Action Plans • 39 – Drafts received and under review • 40 – In progress but no submitted draft • 3 – Suspensions • 1 – Expulsion to be considered by Board – Feb
Member Body Compliance Program Monitoring of Published Action Plans • Soft updates • Completed after six months • Based on interviews with key individuals • Obtain understanding of current progress • Encourage continuing communication • Offer to be of further assistance • Memorandum prepared for archives and CAP review
Member Body Compliance Program Monitoring of Published Action Plans • 20 completed as of February 1, 2010 • Overall member bodies generally remain on track • Some delay caused by changes in regulatory environment or change in priorities • Also noted a number of positive developments • Annual progress reports • Include submission of updated Action Plans • 10 completed or actively in progress
Member Body Compliance Program Need for Financial and Technical Resources to Achieve Desired Actions • Meaningful execution of Action Plan depends on: • Ability of developing bodies to clearly communicate their challenges, required actions, and need for resources • Willingness of national government and donor agencies to provide support and financial resources • Development of useful implementation tools by the DNC and standard setters • Support of regional organizations and developed bodies serving as mentors/partners
Member Body Compliance Program Program to Review the SMOs (2010-2012) • Clarification and increased consistency including • “No less stringent standards” SMO 4 (Ethics) • Statement of applicability in SMO 7 (IFRS+IFRS-SMEs) • Member body governance practices • Corporate governance (OECD principles)? • Review of QA and I&D • Public oversight for auditors of PIEs?
Developing Nations Committee Key activities • Tools and Guidance • Establishing and Strengthening Professional Accountancy Organizations • Technicians Guidelines • Mentoring Guidelines • Advocacy and Liaison with Donor Community • Capacity building to support Public and Private sector Financial Management
Developing Nations Committee Key activities • Mentoring/Twinning by Developed Bodies • Outreach • Professional Accountancy Organizations • Governments • Firms
Code of Ethics – Specific Matters • Compliance Program • Limited to self assessment and limited external validation • Adoption challenges • Principles and rules at a national level often embedded in legislation, regulation and member body governance documents • Implementation challenges • Overcoming cultural barriers
Code of Ethics – Specific Matters • Definition of “Professional Accountant” • SMO 4 Revision – other considerations • Consistency – convergence, translation, etc. • IFAC Member Obligations • CoE applicable to a wide group of stakeholders • SMO establishes member body obligations • “No less stringent standards”
Adoption and Translation Adoption/Translation/Advocacy Activity • Netherlands • Nigeria • Romania • Russia • Scotland • Slovakia • Spain • South Africa • Swaziland • Tanzania • Ukraine • Zambia • Australia • Cambodia • France • Finland • Germany • Hong Kong • Iceland • Ireland • Kenya • Latvia • Macedonia • Mauritius
International Federationof Accountants www.ifac.org