1 / 13

Blending and Flipping

Blending and Flipping. Reaching students at a distance without distancing ourselves from CSULB students. 81% of post-secondary students take at least 1 online course (Sloan, 2013). Framing the conversation about modes of instruction.

tansy
Download Presentation

Blending and Flipping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Blending and Flipping Reaching students at a distance without distancing ourselves from CSULB students

  2. 81% of post-secondary students take at least 1 online course (Sloan, 2013)

  3. Framing the conversation about modes of instruction • There are more modes of instruction (MOI) available today than ever in the history of higher education. • Decisions about MOI are curricular and pedagogical. • Departments/programs are where discussion and decision-making about MOI should talk place. • Diversity of MOI is good for students and can optimize learning. • One size does not fit all, most, or many. • Converting to new MOI requires course redesign.

  4. Why Blending and Flipping – NOW?

  5. Why Blending & Flipping? • What do we know about our campus and our students that will enable us to make sound decisions about modes of instruction, technology, and instruction? • Students want to come to “The Beach.” • We provide an affordable “college experience.” • We provide desirable “brick and mortar” learning and social spaces. • Blending and flipping are consistent with our student success goals.

  6. What is Blended Learning?

  7. Why Blended Learning? • U.S. Department of Education (2012) analyzed 46 studies comparing online, blended, and fact-to-face learning: • CONCLUSION: "blended learning" or courses that include elements of both face-to-face and online learning, is somewhat more effective than either approach by itself.

  8. Examples • 2 hours face-to-face/1 hour online • M/W (f2f)/F online • 1 hour face-to-face/2 hours online • W (f2f)/online throughout the week

  9. What is Flipping?

  10. Examples

  11. What is involved? • Blending, flipping, and fully-online necessitates significant course redesign. • Pre-Redesign Questions: • Will the MOI/technology result in increased student learning? • How comfortable am I using MOI/technology (X)-- even if it fails sometimes? • Will my students be able to use the MOI/technology without subverting other learning goals of the course or compromising learning outcomes? • Have I thought through ways in which the MOI/technology is accessible to the diverse needs of my students? • How will I modify or redesign my course to include the MOI/technology that I have selected? • How will I assess the effectiveness of the MOI/technology on student learning?

  12. Campus Resources for Course Redesign • Faculty Nuggets (Wiki) – coming soon! • Designs4Learning (Blended Course For Faculty) • FLC for Flipping (late Spring/Sumer, 2013) w/Stipend • ITSS Products and Services

  13. Review • Decisions should occur at the department/program level. • Decisions should be curricular and pedagogical. • One size does not fit all, most, or many. • Pedagogical changes do not result in workload reductions. • Pedagogical improvements should result in increased effectiveness and efficiency for faculty and students.

More Related