Latent Space Domain Transfer between High Dimensional Overlapping Distributions

1. Sihong Xie† Wei Fan‡ Jing Peng* Olivier Verscheure‡ Jiangtao Ren† †Sun Yat-Sen University ‡IBM T. J. Watson Research Center *Montclair State University Latent Space Domain Transfer between High Dimensional Overlapping Distributions Main Challenge: Transfer learning High Dimensional (4000 features) Overlapping (<80% features are the same) Solution with performance bounds

2. Standard Supervised Learning training (labeled)‏ test (unlabeled)‏ Classifier 85.5% New York Times New York Times

3. In Reality…… training (labeled)‏ test (unlabeled)‏ Classifier 64.1% Labeled data not available! Reuters New York Times New York Times

4. Domain Difference  Performance Drop train test ideal setting Classifier NYT NYT 85.5% New York Times New York Times realistic setting Classifier NYT Reuters 64.1% Reuters New York Times

5. High Dimensional Data Transfer High Dimensional Data: Text Categorization Image Classification The number of features in our experiment is more than 4000 • Challenges: • High dimensionality. • more than training examples • Euclidean distance becomes similar • Feature sets completely overlapping? • No. Some less than 80% features are the same. • Marginally not so related? • Harder to find transferable structures • Proper similarity definition.

6. Transfer between high dimensional overlapping distributions • Overlapping Distribution Data from two domains may not be lying on exactly the same space, but at most an overlapping one.

7. Transfer between high dimensional overlapping distributions • Problems with overlapping distribution • Using only the overlapping features may be lack of predictive information Hard to predict correctly

8. Transfer between high dimensional overlapping distributions D2 { A, B} = 0.0181 > D2 {A, C} = 0.0101 • Overlapping Distribution • Use the union of all features and fill in the missing value “zeros”? Does it helps? A is mis-classified as the same class as C, instead of B

9. Transfer between high dimensional overlapping distributions • When one uses the union of the overlapping and non-overlapping features and leave the missing values as “zero”, • the distance of two marginal distributions p(x) can become asymptotically very large as a function of non-overlapping features: • becomes a dominant factor in similarity measure.

10. Transfer between high dimensional overlapping distributions • High dimensionality can underpin important features The “blues” are closer to the “green” than to the “red”

11. LatentMap: two step correction • Missing value regression • Brings marginal distribution closer • Latent space dimensionality reduction • Further brings marginal distribution closer • Ignores non-important noisy and “error imported features” • Identify transferable substructures across two domains.

12. Missing Value Regression D { img(A’), B} = 0.0109 < D {img(A’), C} = 0.0125 • Filling up missing values (recall the previous example) 2. Map from z to x Relationship found byregression model 1. Project to overlapped feature A is correctly classified as the same class as B

13. Dimensionality Reduction Word vector Matrix Missing Values Missing Values Filled Overlapping Features

14. Dimensionality Reduction • Project the word vector matrix to the most important and inherent sub-space Low dimensional representation

15. Solution (high dimensionality) The blues are closer to the reds than to the greens • recall the previous example The blues are closer to the greens than to the reds

16. Properties • It can bring the marginal distributions of two domain close. - Marginal distributions are brought close in high-dimensional space (section 3.2) - Two marginal distributions are further minimized in low dimensional space. (theorem 3.2) • It bring two domains conditional distributions close. - Nearby instances from two domains have similar conditional distribution (section 3.3) • It can reduce domain transfer risk - The risk of nearest neighbor classifier can be bounded in transfer learning settings. (theorem 3.3)

17. 20 News groups comp rec Out-Domain First fill up the “GAP”, then use knn classifier to do classification comp.sys rec.sport comp.graphics rec.auto In-Domain Experiment (I)‏ • Data Sets • 20 News Groups • 20000 newsgroup articles • SRAA (simulated real auto aviation) • 73128 articles from 4 discussion groups • Reuters • 21758 Reuters news articles • Baseline methods • naïve Bayes, logistic regression, SVM • Knn-Reg: missing value filled without SVD • pLatentMap: SVD but missing value as 0 Try to justify the two steps in our framework

18. Learning Tasks

19. Experiment (II)‏ 10 win 1 loss Overall performance

20. 8 win 3 loss 8 win 3 loss Compared with knnReg Compared with pLatentMap knnReg: Missing values filled but without SVD pLatentMap: SVD but without filling missing values Experiment (III)‏

21. Conclusion • Problem: High dimensional overlapping domain transfer -– text and image categorization • Step 1: Missing values filling up ---Bring two domains’ marginal distributions closer • Step 2: SVD dimension reduction --- Further bring two marginal distributions closer (Theorem 3.2) --- Cluster points from two domains, making conditional distribution transferable. (Theorem 3.3) • Code and data available from the author’s webpage

24. Solution (high dimensionality) • Illustration of SVD Top k singular vectors So We can …. Top k singular-values The most important and inherent information is in eigen-vectors corresponding to the top k eigen-values.

25. Analysis (I)‏ Brings the marginal distributions close In original space • SVR (support vector regression) minimizes the distance between two domains’ marginal distributions Minimized by SVR Upper bound of distance between 2 domains’ points on overlapping features

26. Min Analysis (II)‏ • SVD also clusters data such that nearby data have similar concept Objective function of k-means SVD achieve the optimum solution ∝

27. Analysis (III) • SVD (singular value decomposition) bounds the distance of two marginal distributions (Theorem 3.2)‏ So the two marginal distributions are brought closer ||T||2 = Where >1 Vk =XT

28. R ∝ -cov(r1, r2) Where ri related with conditional distribution ↓ ↑ Analysis (IV)‏ • Bound the risk (R) of Nearest Neighbor classifierunder transfer learning settings (Theorem 3.3)‏ • The larger the distance between two conditional distributions, the higher the bound will be • Justify why we use SVD Cluster data such that nearest neighbors have similar conditional distribution

29. Experiment (IV)‏ Parameter sensitivity Number of neighbors to retrieve Number of the dimension of latent space

30. Thank you!