170 likes | 248 Views
Building Quality into Education. Kathryn Fraser, Dietitian, NHS Forth Valley Mary Robertson, DSN, NHS Tayside. Overview of Education Programmes. Tayside Insulin Management Programme (TIM) run since 2006 25 courses to date Forth Valley’s NewDEAL programme run since March 2008
E N D
Building Quality into Education Kathryn Fraser, Dietitian, NHS Forth Valley Mary Robertson, DSN, NHS Tayside
Overview of Education Programmes • Tayside Insulin Management Programme (TIM) • run since 2006 • 25 courses to date • Forth Valley’s NewDEAL programme • run since March 2008 • 7 courses to date
Both based on BERTIE (Bournemouth’s intensive insulin management programme) • 1 day of education per week for 4 weeks • Week between allows for experiential learning
Both teams have had BIDAC training from the Bournemouth team • Trained educators for the programme we run • Both have a philosophy and identified learning theories
Programmes have a structured, written curriculum which has been evaluated by patients and professionals • The curriculum includes specific aims and learning outcomes • There is an educators guide on delivering the programmes
Audit pre and post course to show the effect of the course on clinical markers and quality of life
Programme covers • Role of insulins • Carbohydrate counting and dose adjustment • Hypoglycaemia • Hyperglycaemia and SDR • Exercise and activity • Complications of diabetes
Why QA? • We want better outcomes for our patients • QA ensures that what we are doing is “fit for purpose” • QA ensures regulation of the quality of the service we provide • Quality is also determined by the people using our service
Internal/External QA? • What’s the difference? - Purpose • Internal review - improvement of course/self • External - looking at the quality of the course when reviewer is not there
Evidence is therefore required • Can be reported to others -some may see this as a threat
Internal • Self/Peer review • Patient evaluations • Act on self/peer assessments, make changes • Keep a record of all reviews
External • Service organisation to support programme delivery • Venue - ? Suitable/access • Curriculum - ? Reviewed for structure,process and content
Materials used in the way described in curriculum? • Process for review of the programme/when last undertaken? • Examples of how peer/self review has influenced course development
Review of patient evaluation process/how often is this undertaken/what changes have been made in light of patient feedback? • How does the audit process feed into programme development? • ? Process which review of audit data is used to alter the structure, process or outcome of the course
What have we done so far? • Already had participant evaluation of each session and programme including written material used • Reviewed how we currently assessed our education sessions/each other • Reviewed/developed our peer assessment tool
Reviewed teaching resources/identified improvements required/decided what to change • Ensured staff members delivering education undertook/were offered to undertake an educators module
What do we still have to do? • Develop written statements describing the components of our internal/external QA/decide how often to do this • Agree criteria for external assessment • Identify trained, competent, independent assessors for external review