1 / 40

Too Much of a Good Thing! The Uncritical Use of Medical Imaging Bruce J. Hillman, MD

Eastern Radiological Society Southern Pines, North Carolina April 2013. Too Much of a Good Thing! The Uncritical Use of Medical Imaging Bruce J. Hillman, MD. Disclosures of Bruce J. Hillman, MD. Founder and Chief Scientific Officer, ACR Image Metrix (consultant)

tareq
Download Presentation

Too Much of a Good Thing! The Uncritical Use of Medical Imaging Bruce J. Hillman, MD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Eastern Radiological Society Southern Pines, North Carolina April 2013 Too Much of a Good Thing!The Uncritical Use of Medical ImagingBruce J. Hillman, MD

  2. Disclosures of Bruce J. Hillman, MD • Founder and Chief Scientific Officer, ACR Image Metrix (consultant) • Imaging contract research organization owned by ACR • Consultant to numerous drug and device companies • Philips Healthcare Executive Team Advisory Board and Radiology Medical Advisory Network (consultant) • Author, The Sorcerer’s Apprentice: How Medical Imaging is Changing Health Care, Oxford University Press, 2010 (royalties)

  3. Too Much of a Good Thing! • The perception of overuse • Use and misuse • The impact of uncritical use • Opportunities for change They say golf is like life, but don’t believe them. Golf is more complicated than that - Gardner Dickinson

  4. Premises • Modern cross-sectional imaging has made medicine: • Safer • More effective • Broad economic concerns about imaging • Imaging represents about 12% of health insurers’ outlays • 3-5% in 1995 • 2000-2005: Imaging growth 3x general medical inflation • 5x for high technology imaging Money doesn’t talk, it shouts - Bob Dylan

  5. It’s All About the Money 70 Imaging Tests 60 Other procedures All physician services Major procedures Evaluation & management 50 40 Cumulative Percent Change 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Source: MedPAC

  6. Premises • The financial success has led to an anti-imaging bias • Imaging has replaced others’ procedures • Radiologists’ incomes have risen faster then most others’ • More money for imaging means less for everyone else • Too much of imaging is said to be unnecessary Whenever a friend succeeds, a little something in me dies - Gore Vidal

  7. Premises • Prevalent attitude that growth in imaging is necessarily bad • Reduced technical payments mandated by 2005 DRA and 2010 PPACA • Attacks on professional payments • Increased imaging actually a combination of: • Appropriate growth • Aberrant incentives • Uncritical use Where there is mystery, it is generally suspected there must also be evil - Lord Byron

  8. Much of the Growth Is Expected • Imaging should be growing • Aging population • Burden of chronic illness • Imaging adept at diagnosis, staging, response to treatment • Technological improvement has enabled new and valuable applications • Less morbidity, shorter convalescence

  9. Less Acceptable Growth • Patients desire more care • Moral hazard of health insurance • Direct-to-consumer TV and print advertisements • Boomer interest in wellness and health • Availability of (mis)information on the Web

  10. Less Acceptable Growth • Busy physicians misuse advanced imaging as a screening/triage tool • Humor patients and retain their loyalty • Diminishing time allotted per patient • Mandates for greater productivity • Faster to order a test than spend time: • Talking to patients • Considering the value of the test • Systemic pressures to perform imaging for financial gain

  11. Least Acceptable Growth • Principle agent moral hazard • Fancy economic term for self-referral • Physician behavior changes with: • The need to cover their “nut” • The chance to enhance revenue • Stark in-office ancillary services exception (IOASE) enabled by canny industry innovations • Single purpose • Minification • Simplification

  12. An Unholy Convergence • Economically motivated imaging use meets patient desire for more and higher tech care • Physician controls the volume of referrals • Patient is protected by third party insurance from the cost of care • Large body of research confirms higher utilization

  13. Least Acceptable Growth • Defensive medical testing – referring physicians • 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society survey: 28% of all CT referrals to reduce liability • Tendency to overestimate small legal risks if consequences to patient or physician are severe • Patients referred for imaging even when there is low probability the test will benefit the patient • Very low or very high probability of disease • Poor test performance

  14. Least Acceptable Growth • Defensive medical testing - radiologists • Radiologists also overestimate malpractice risk • A “miss” much more likely to generate a suit than an “overcall” • Adopt high sensitivity/low specificity approach to interpretation • High false positive rate • Unnecessary follow-on tests and treatment • Recommend follow-on testing for • Low probability concerns • “Churning” or “auto-referral”

  15. Uncritical Imaging • The less acceptable rationales for imaging focus on possible benefit, though not always for the patient BUT • All imaging bears risks • For appropriate exams: benfit/risk is high • for marginal or inappropriate imaging There is low likelihood of patient benefit

  16. The Risks of Uncritical Imaging • Most physicians and patients concerned about radiation and contrast media reactions BUT • The greatest risk of uncritical imaging is that something will be found Three things can happen when you pass a football, and two of them are bad - Woody Hayes

  17. True Negative Result • The test is negative and the patient truly has no disease ________________ • What the patient is hoping for • Patient feels less anxious about their symptoms and may (for a short while) pursue healthful behaviors Cost plus benefit

  18. False Negative Result • The patient has important disease but the test incorrectly indicates no problem exists _________________ • The patient and physician may be satisfied and fail to pursue further diagnostic efforts even if symptoms worsen • Late and less effective treatment Cost, no (negative) benefit

  19. False Positive Result • The imaging interpretation is positive but the patient is actually normal • Patients receive f/u testing/treatment that does not improve health, adds cost, and may cause harm • Anxiety • Iatrogenic injury • Radiation exposure _______________ Cost, no benefit

  20. True Positive Result Possibility #1 • The patient has a serious condition, which is treatable, and the outcome of treatment is a cure or other improvement in health ______________________ • Why we test Cost and benefit

  21. True Positive Result Possibility #2: Pseudodisease • Patient has the condition for which she is being tested but will not be affected by the disease in her lifetime • Slow growing • Patient dies of something else • Disease is resistant to treatment • Same outcome regardless of imaging finding __________________ Cost, no benefit

  22. True Positive Result • Possibility #3: Incidentaloma • Finding unrelated to the symptoms leading to testing • Small fraction with a risk to future health and where intervention improves outcome • Much larger fraction receives a workup and/or treatment for benign conditions ____________________________ Cost, small percent of patients benefit

  23. The Root Cause of Uncritical Use Uncritical use due to multiple synergistic influences derived from a single root cause.

  24. The Root Cause The quixotic pursuit of unattainable clinical certainty

  25. Education and Culture • All physicians educated and most trained in academic medical centers • High probability of disease • High severity of illness index • High intensity of care The only time my prayers are never answered is when I’m playing golf - Billy Graham

  26. Education and Culture • Academic faculty distracted by multiple missions • Clinical service • Education and training • Scholarly work • Service and administration • Success in academics requires adaptive strategies • How to handle time-consuming clinical work while managing the responsibilities that advance a career? OR • How to be two places at once?!

  27. Education and Culture • “Supervise” students and house staff • Conduct morning rounds • Make assignments • Entrust house staff to make management decisions at off-hours

  28. Education and Culture • Housestaff: • Have variable but usually lesser expertise • Also are torn among diverse responsibilities • Clinical care • Read and study • Research and administration • Are under pressure to open beds • Crowded ERs • Maximize institutional profit from DRGs and capitation • Learn early-on that calling the attending is a weakness • Discouraged by fellow trainees

  29. Education and Culture • Housestaff adopt a shotgun approach to imaging exams that fails to consider • Performance characteristics of the test • Likelihood of disease • Consequences to patients • Objectives are to minimize: • Attending exertions • “Wasted” time that could be used for more concrete responsibilities • The possibility of humiliation

  30. Hang ‘em High An example made of one individual is a lesson taught to all

  31. The Root Cause • Even in high frequency, high acuity environments, these practices are wasteful and potentially harmful BUT • Physicians take high intensity practice style learned in academic health centers to lower intensity settings in which the problems are magnified

  32. Education and Culture • Learned practice style persists and is even encouraged by other physicians in the practice • Saves time in patient encounters and improves throughput • Perceived as a safeguard against malpractice liability • May generate revenue for self-referral practices or for horizontally integrated health system • Even when there is either near certainty or near impossibility of a condition: • Referring physicians tend to request an exam • Radiologists err on the side of overcalls • Imaging begets more imaging

  33. Opportunities for Change Low Hanging Fruit • Correct lawyers’ incentives • Current incentives encourage frivolous suits and disenfranchise some with legitimate claims • Alternatives • Malpractice suit fee schedule • Loser pays • Cap amount earned by contingency fees ___________________ Opposed by a powerful lobby

  34. Opportunities for Change Low Hanging Fruit • Terminate the in-office ancillary services exception allowing high-tech imaging in offices • Never intended to sanction high-tech imaging • The money is too big to be ignored • Wasteful of public and personal resources • Harmful to patients’ health _____________________ Opposed by large and powerful coalition

  35. Change the Referring Physician Mindset • For future referring MDs • Teach “elegant diagnosis” • Encourage critical reading of the medical literature • Gear teaching toward: • Appropriate use of imaging • Consultation with radiologists

  36. Require the Following Considerations Before Imaging • Did the patient already have the test? • Why repeat? • Can the previous test/result be obtained? • Will the test change patient care? • What are the probability and negative consequences of a FP test or pseudodisease? • What is the short term danger of not performing the exam? • Is the reason for testing patient expectations? • What else could be done? - Laine, Ann Int Med, Jan. 2012

  37. If Not Us, Someone Will Ask • Radiology benefits management firms (RBMs) hired by insurers to reduce uncritical imaging • Preauthorization required or the patient is charged • “Black box” clinical guidelines • Sentinel effect • Barrier effect • Clinical decision support systems • Based on guidelines • Require major cultural change • Must mandate a “hard stop” to be effective

  38. Current Radiologists Must Be Role Models • Be a role model to trainees and newly minted radiologists • Reinvigorate consultation with referring MDs • Avoid the appearance of self-interest • Support policies that benefit patients even if less revenue • Take the lead in reducing imaging exams that are unlikely to benefit patients • Contest marginal and unnecessary requests • Discourage imaging to reduce small uncertainties • Minimize indecisiveness over findings of low importance • Advocate valuable and underutilized imaging • Establish direct communications with patients • Pre-exam consultation • Direct reporting • Post-exam consultation

  39. Summary • Uncritical imaging is related to a combination of educational, cultural, and economic factors that promote marginal and unnecessary use • Decreasing the effects of external influences like financial incentives and fear of litigation are important but will not be sufficient to stem uncritical imaging • Physicians must adopt a different practice style emphasizing consultation with radiologists and critical thought before requesting imaging exams

  40. Contact: bjh8a@virginia.edu Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of a bagpipe. - unattributed

More Related