190 likes | 278 Views
SG 8 Seminar. WP 8F Workplan. Jim Ragsdale, USA. SG 8 Seminar. WP 8F Work Flows (1):. WP 8F deliverables for WRC 07 timeframe are grouped in three high level groups: Demand: IMT.MARKET, IMT.SRVC_View Supply: IMT.METH, IMT.ESTIMATE Where: IMT.CANDI Generically known as:
E N D
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Workplan Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (1): • WP 8F deliverables for WRC 07 timeframe are grouped in three high level groups: • Demand: IMT.MARKET, IMT.SRVC_View • Supply: IMT.METH, IMT.ESTIMATE • Where: IMT.CANDI • Generically known as: • What for?; How much?; Where? Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (2): Jim Ragsdale, USA
WRC SPECEstmt Can Freq SERVMkt Svcs Meth DEV TECHRad_asp SAT Coord Ad-Hoc Migrate Ad-Hoc Workplan SG 8 Seminar Original WP 8F Structure: Working Groups WP 8F Plenary Ad-Hoc and Coordination Groups Coordination with external forums (research, standards, other ITU groups, etc.) Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Flows (3): • WP 8F deliverables demand great interaction among Working Groups • Services • Spectrum • Technology • WRC • This was complicated in the original structure due to interactions among Sub-Working groups • Market, Services, Methodology • Estimate, Spectrum Bands, Frequency Arrangements, Sharing • Radio Aspects Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP8F Original Interactions Jim Ragsdale, USA Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F SWG Restructure • WP 8F at 13th meeting in Berlin restructured Sub-Working Groups • Methodology and Estimate combined and renamed SpeCalc, home is Services WG until 16th meeting, then moved to Spectrum WG • Market and Services combined, renamed Market • Restructure smooths interactions among Sub-Working groups • Market and Service aspects in same Sub-Working Group • Methodology and initial Estimate work in same Sub-Working Group; In same Working Group as Market • Final Estimate work in WG Spectrum along with CANDI Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Deliverable Plan: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 >2010 CPM/WRC meeting <WRC CPM> WRC> SG 8 meeting * * * * * * * * WP 8F meeting No. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Service View Services Mark et Methodology (to be moved to WG Spec in meeting #16) Services/market aspects (SERV) Estimate (to be moved to WG Spec in meeting #16) Naming Naming WRC Preparations (WRC) CPM Text Candidate Spectrum Mitigate Spectrum Sharing Comp (SPEC) UWB Survey M.1036 Rev 2 Migrate (MIGRATE) Texts Developing (DEV) Handbook update (if required) SDR Radio aspects Technology (TECH) M.1079 Rev2 M.1580/1 Trends Enhancements to IMT - 2000 Annual revisions to M.1457 and, if necessary, revisions to other Recommendations on IMT - 2000 IMT.RADIO and subsequ ent revisions, if necessary New radio interface(s) for IMT.GCS and subsequent systems beyond revisions Development of detailed specifications for enhancements of Radio interface IMT - 2000 and IMT - 2000 development process Complementary enhancement work to be performed Research on new technologies Development of detailed Systems outside ITU specifications/standards beyond IMT - 2000 WRC - 07 related Key: deliver Recommendations Reports/Circulars etc. ables Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Deliverables: • Planned WP8F Deliverables (WRC-07 timeframe): • Methodology (IMT.METH • Estimate (IMT.ESTIMATE) • Candidate Spectrum (IMT.CANDI) • Radio Aspects (IMT.RAD_ASPECTS) • Market (IMT.MARKET) • Service View (IMT.SRVC_VIEW) • Services (IMT.SRVC) • Naming (IMT.NAME) • Sharing Studies • Survey (IMT.SURVEY) • Revision of M.1036-2 (2500-2690 MHz addition) • Software Defined Radio (IMT.SDR) • Revisions to M.1457 • Handbook Supplement Jim Ragsdale, USA
2005 Number Start End Year Location Status Comment Meeti ng 15 1 Feb 8 Feb 2005 Geneva Firm WP 8F WP 8F Working 6 Jun 7 Jun 2005 Canada Firm (selected Group WGs) Meetings 16 8 Jun 15 Jun 2005 Canada Firm WP 8F WP 8F 17 12 Oct 19 Oct 2005 Finland Firm SG 8 21 Nov 22 Nov 2005 Geneva Firm SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (1): Jim Ragsdale, USA
2006 Number Start End Year Location Status Comme nts Meeting 18 25 Jan 1 Feb 2006 [Bangkok] moved WP 8F forward WP 8F 18 8 Feb 15 Feb 2006 [Bangkok] changed 19 3 May 10 2006 [France] moved (date constrained WP 8F by RRC - 06 dates) May forward WP 8F 19 17 24 2006 [France] changed May May RRC - 06 15 16 Jun 2006 Geneva Firm RRC - 06 May 20 23 30 2006 [USA] Replaces WP 8F Aug Aug Nov 06 meeting Deadline ~5 2006 Approximately 6 months before for CPM Sept CPM - 07 Chapter text WP 8F 20 15 22 2006 [USA] changed Nov Nov SG 8 7 Dec 8 Dec 2006 Geneva Firm SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (2): Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Meeting Plan (3): 2007 Meeting Number Start End Year Location Status Comments 21 17 Jan 25 Jan 2007 [Geneva] Tentative WP 8F ITU CPM - 5 Mar 16 Mar 2007 Geneva Firm 07 May 22 23 31 May 2007 [TBD] Tentative (date c onstrained WP 8F by RA - 07 & SG - 8) SG 8 25 Jun 26 Jun 2007 Geneva Tentative (date constrained by RA - 07 approx 3 months prior to RA) ITU RA - 1 Oct 5 Oct 2007 Geneva Firm 07 ITU WRC - 8 Oct 2 Nov 2007 Geneva Firm 07 Jim Ragsdale, USA
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY Methodology Title IMT.METH Identifier Recommendation Document Type WG - SERV. ITU - R WP 8F Lead Group Please note that this activity may be moved into WG - WRC as the WRC - 07 preparations become more advanced. This should be considered later in 2004. Volker Reitz, Deutsche Telekom AG, Germany Sub - group chair e - mail: Voker.Reitz@t - systems.com; Tel: +49 6151 9372468 Thomas Welter, Bouygues Telecom, France Editor e - mail: twelter@bouyguestelecom.fr; Tel:+33 1 39454136 This document describes the methodology used to calculate the Focus for scope and work spectrum requirements for the future development of IMT - 2000 and systems beyond IMT - 2000 from the year 2010 onw ards to fulfil the vision for the future development of IMT - 2000 and systems beyond IMT - 2000. It needs to be determined if a new methodology recommendation or a revision of the existing methodology ITU - R M.1390 is required. However, it is obvious that clea r guidelines and a comprehensive iterative process in the development of this modified/new recommendation will be required in conjunction with the other activities such as market/services, radio and spectrum aspects. The methodology will be developed in cl ose cooperation with all relevant working groups. This recommendation will not include values for additional spectrum requirements; these will be developed within [ IMT.ESTIMATE ] . SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(1) Jim Ragsdale, USA
MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (2) Recommendation ITU - R M.[ IMT.SPEC ] Related documents Recommendation ITU - R M .1645 Recommendation ITU - R M.1390 Recommendation ITU - R M.[ IMT.RAD_ASPECTS ] Recommendation ITU - R M.[ IMT.ESTIMATE ] Report ITU - R M.[ IMT.MARKET ] Comment: More details need to be added according to progress of work SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(2) Jim Ragsdale, USA
Meeting #10 (concluded) · Review a nd produce initial scope · Produce initial document structure · Produce workplan / milestones Meeting #11 (concluded) · Modify plan in greater detail · Modify scope and document structure Milestones · Initial development of developing guidelines for the methodology · Initial de velopment of methodology flow charts · Consider interrelationship with other radio systems Meeting #12 (concluded) · Finalise developing guidelines for the methodology · Determine whether a new methodology Recommendation or a revision to the Rec. ITU - R M.1390 is necessary · Completion of basic flow chart · Preliminary view on what information on services and radio environments is required for methodology; submission to SWG Service · Preliminary view on what technical parameters need to be considered for the spectrum c alculation methodology; submission to SWG Radio Aspects · Determine the technical approach for the methodology to estimate future spectrum requirements. · Identify possible work items and their influences/interactions with other groups within WP 8F SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(3) MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (3) Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(4) MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (4) Meeting #13 Milestones · Identify what technical parameters need to be considered for developing the spectrum calculation methodology · Submission of the technical parameter requirement to SWG Radio Aspects · Develop initi al calculation algorithm · Consider the relationship between the methodology developed here and Rec. ITU - R M.1391, dealing with the satellite component of IMT - 2000. Meeting #14 · Use initial set of preliminary figures from Market Report (IMT.MARKET), Service View and Radio Aspects (IMT.RADIO) to begin to test the methodology through an iterative process · Determine calculation algorithm · Submission of the material available on the methodology to SWG Estimate Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Micro Workplans(5) MICRO WORKPLAN FOR METHODOLOGY (5) Meeting #15 Milestones · Final adjustment of algorithm using a set of figures from Service/Market (Service View, Report IMT.MARKET) and Radio Aspects (IMT.RADIO) Meeting # 16 · Agreement of Methodology Recommendation · Submission of Methodology Recommendation t o SWG Estimate Meeting # 17 · Consideration of comments from application in SWG Estimate · Final approval of methodology Recommendation in WP8F and submission to SG 8 Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar Thank you Jim Ragsdale, USA
SG 8 Seminar WP 8F Work Plan 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 WRC WRC-03 WRC-07 WP 8F WRC preparations • Draft text for WRC-07: • Spectrum estimate • Candidate freq ranges • When • What for / name • Methods to satisfy agenda • Footnote text • Pooled / shared / paired / etc. ? Future Services / Market Analysis Future Spectrum Calculation Methodology Future Spectrum Estimate Future Technology Assumptions Spectrum Survey Sharing Studies Radio Aspects WP 8F other spectrum- related activities 2.5GHz Spectrum Plan Peter Scheele, Germany, for the Chairman of WP 8F