Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Michael Butkus and Judy Kurtzman

1. Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Michael Butkus and Judy Kurtzman Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University

2. Rapid GrowthCities and Communities Experiencing Growth Rates Exceeding the National Average A Number of Problems: • lack of infrastructure • increased cost of living • changes in land values • lack of planning to manage growth • resulting environmental and social impacts • perceived decline in quality of life

3. Certainly True in the State of Utah • High rate of in-migration • Highest birthrate in the nation • Concentrated growth--sixth most urban state • High rate of land and resource use • Poor zoning regulations encouraging sprawl

4. More Than Four-Fifths of Utah’s Population Now Lives in a Metropolis--the Greater Wasatch--a Ten County “Blob” of Urbanization The Greater Wasatch • By 2020... • 67% increase in GW--1.6M to 2.7M people • Adding 43,000 people every year • 84% increase in developed land (590 square miles) • By 2050... • Five million people in Utah

5. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project • Purpose: Identify open space needs, priorities, and initiatives for each of the seven Planning Districts in Utah. • Focus on issues related to: • outdoor recreation • amenity values • ecological services

6. Utah’s 7 Planning Districtsand 29 Counties • Bear River • Wasatch Front • Mountainland • Uintah Basin • Central • Southeastern • Southwestern

7. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project • Seek input from key stakeholders: • land management and planning professionals; • state and local officials; • community leaders and residents. • Identify action strategies for addressing open space needs.

8. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectThree Phase Process • Phase 1: • Phase 2: • Phase 3: Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference Statewide Key Informant Mail Survey Public Meetings--Presentations of Findings and Opportunities for Stakeholder Input

9. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectUtah’s Great Outdoors Conference • 176 participants in 19 different groups responded to these two questions: • What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space needs inyourregionofthestate for the next 20 years? • What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space problems or needs forspecifictownsandcommunitiesinyourregion?

10. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectUtah’s Great Outdoors Conference Results: • Question #1--414 items identified: “Preserve the wetlands and wildlife areas surrounding the Great Salt Lake.” • Question #2--242 items identified: “Small communities have insufficient funds for purchase of critical lands or development of recreation facilities.”

11. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectStatewide Key Informant Survey • To further validate and prioritize theimportance of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District that were identified at the Conference (7-point Likert Scale). • To obtain stakeholder attitudes toward 25 open space protection tools (7-point Likert Scale).

12. 287 Surveys Mailed 182 Returned 63% Response Rate Utah’s Great Outdoors A survey conducted by Utah State University’s Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism and the Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Spring 1999 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectStatewide Key Informant Survey

13. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectStatewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs • Statewide: • Cooperation/partnerships in planning for and provision of open space; • Trails/corridors for recreation and access; • Education for children and adults directed at proper use, minimizing impacts, and importance of open space; • Developing access and managing open space.

14. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectStatewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs • Northern Utah: • Water quality and quantity, wetlands, and wildlife habitat; • Protecting access to mountain canyons and public lands; • Open space protection in urban, suburban, and developing areas; • Land acquisition (identification and funding).

15. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectStatewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs • Rural Utah: • Long-term, reliable funding for development and maintenance; • Long-range planning (cooperation and assistance); • Specific projects with economic benefits; • Community quality of life and economic benefits; • Historic/heritage sites.

16. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectPublic Meetings • Present prioritized listing of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District. • Seek out stakeholder comments on these findings. • Ask participants to identify existing and potential projects addressing outdoor recreation and open space needs.

17. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectPublic Meetings • Presentations: • To approximately 350 individuals at 19 different meetings throughout the state; • Association of Governments (AOG) meetings in each Planning District; • Travel Region meetings; • City/County Councils meetings; • Special Groups (e.g. Public Lands Forum)

18. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectResults of Public Meetings • Over 300 specific outdoor recreation and open space projects identified for the seven Planning Districts in Utah. • A broader picture of the social and political context in which open space planning must occur in Utah.

19. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Two broad types of open space needs: • Specific Purpose Projects • • individual trails• water projects • • visitor centers • heritage sites • • parks • General Concerns • • funding • education • • partnerships • planning needs

20. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • There are two different orientations toward open space values. • Some major differences exist between stakeholders in urban/suburban and rural planning districts regarding the purpose and value of open space.

21. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Urban/Suburban stakeholders emphasize protection of open space for non-use or intrinsic values, along with recreational and access needs. • For community aesthetics and amenities • For controlling growth and development • For providing ecological services -wildlife habitat -wetlands protection -water quality

22. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Stakeholders in rural areas are more concerned with the use value or instrumental value of open space. • To help meet local economic needs through outdoor recreation and tourism development • To retain public access for recreation • To retain traditions of multiple use of natural resources on public lands

23. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Key challenge to successful, long-term statewide planning and funding efforts... …is providing opportunities to enhance both the use and environmental protection roles of open space simultaneously.

24. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectRecommendations • Linking these two orientations is possible. • Will require an explicit and balanced effort to bring these together. • Especially important to encourage support and collaboration with rural areas of the state.

25. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Open space linear corridors and water-related resources are critical. • Linear corridors mentioned most often: -trails and paths -bikeways -OHV routes • Corridors implied by projects mentioned for: -parkways -riparian corridors -riverways -wildlife corridors -canyon protection & access -corridors linking communities & towns

26. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Water-related projects are considered important throughout the state. • In rural areas, focus is on providing or improving reservoir and river recreation. • In urban/suburban areas, water quality, wetlands protection, and wildlife habitat are of equal or greater importance.

27. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectRecommendations • To enhance long-term benefits from statewide coordination and funding will require Specific Purpose Projects to be designed to simultaneously meet recreational development and use goals along with natural resource protection goals.

28. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Funding, funding, funding… • Stakeholders throughout the Planning Districts view funding as a key role for state agencies. • Not simply providing funds, but also providing technical advice and coordination for identifying and acquiring funds.

29. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectRecommendations • Provide a larger portion of funds to rural Planning Districts. • Distributing funds on per capita basis is problematic. • Many urban/suburban residents travel to rural areas of the state for recreation. • Tourists visit many of the rural areas. • Puts a higher level of pressure on rural resources and infrastructure.

30. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes & Recommendations • Long-term and consistent sources of funding important for rural areas. • Long-term resource protection and amenity/ecological service values are statewide concerns. • Funding should be used to encourage planning districts to help protect these broader social values.

31. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes Evident • Local Control--State Coordination In general, stakeholders see great value in statewide coordination of open space planning and funding efforts, but at the same time want to retain local control.

32. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectRecommendations • Focus on projects that meet local needs. • Large pool of existing and potential open space projects in all planning regions. • Priorities can be identified by local stakeholders. • Local needs should be a starting point for statewide planning and funding priorities.

33. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectRecommendations • But also focus on projects that meet broader state needs. • Funding criteria should recognize both use and non-use values of open space. • Funding should help meet local needs as well as broader state level needs. • Open space planning and funding must be a joint effort between local and state agencies and stakeholders.

34. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes & Recommendations • Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: • Meets both local and state level needs; • Has local community support; • Is part of larger scale planning efforts;

35. Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space ProjectMajor Themes & Recommendations • Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: • Meets objectives related to amenity and ecological service values... even if the project focuses on use; • Is part of a collaboration or partnership; • Has an educational component.

36. Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr & Dale Blahna Michael Butkus & Judy Kurtzman Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University 5220 Old Main Hill Logan, Utah 84322-5220 (435) 797-7094 swburr@cc.usu.edu