1 / 11

ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace

ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace. Evaluation of Software Providers for Midsize Institutions. Bill Reed Director, Special Projects Northern Kentucky University. Northern Kentucky University. Major Metropolitan University Over 14,000 Students (FTE 10,500)

tate
Download Presentation

ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ERP Applications Selection in a Changing Marketplace Evaluation of Software Providers for Midsize Institutions Bill Reed Director, Special Projects Northern Kentucky University

  2. Northern Kentucky University Major Metropolitan University Over 14,000 Students (FTE 10,500) Undergraduate Education; Graduate Programs; Community Engagement www.nku.edu

  3. Why Should We Do This? Information systems provide the infrastructure for delivery of essential services (recruiting, admissions, financial aid, course registration, grading, degree progress, reporting, budget preparation, fiscal management, organizational management, payroll, alumni development, facilities management, on and on and on) Our current systems (financial, human resources, and student records) can’t meet the needs of a modern metropolitan university We need systems that are enablers of change, not roadblocks NKU’s strategic initiatives cannot be achieved without a foundation of robust, efficient information systems Access to information for decision-making is difficult The cost/benefit ratio for maintaining older technology platforms is very poor Risk incurred by delaying replacement is too high

  4. How Do We Get Started? Create an operational framework Steering Committee (executive level) – general guidance and authority Advisory Committee (one level lower, key Directors and major stakeholders) – decision-making and consensus-building Core Project Team (experienced staff from key departments on full-time re-assignment) – leadership and daily operations

  5. How Do We Get Started? Establish goals and an identity • NKU’s PRISM Project – Process Re-Engineering and Information Systems Migration prism.nku.edu • Implement efficient, flexible, well-integrated systems that support our core mission of educating students • Improve our business practices internally and externally • Enhance our capacity and ability to manage change

  6. How Do We Get Started? Conduct Informal Research What are our benchmark or peer institutions using? Who is making news in the higher ed space? What does the IT and business literature tell us about these providers? How do people commonly implement these systems? Can we get a fix on typical budgets for these projects? How do these systems look and feel?

  7. Now We’re Getting Serious: How Do We Make a Good Decision? Publish a Request for Proposals Keep the focus on the project goals Describe the general scope and any known constraints Be specific on format of responses and evaluation criteria Establish a reasonable timeline Preserve maximum flexibility for reaching a decision

  8. Now We’re Getting Serious: How Do We Make a Good Decision? Conduct Structured Demonstrations Identify representative processes and/or critical business scenarios Examine the underlying technology Focus on architecture, tools, and sample functionality Don’t allow demos of versions in development (look at release history and R&D budgets as predictors of future behavior)

  9. Now We’re Getting Serious: How Do We Make a Good Decision? Evaluation and Selection System architecture (including support for open standards), security configuration, reporting functionality Application software functionality (including support for best practices) Company characteristics (strategic vision, customer support resources and commitment, R&D, financial stability, client references) Total costs (acquisition, implementation, maintenance) Implementation and maintenance factors (availability and cost of 3rd party consulting and training services, proven methodologies for implementation and support, training plans and opportunities)

  10. Why SAP? System architecture (including support for open standards), security configuration, reporting functionality Application software functionality (including support for best practices) Company characteristics (strategic vision, customer support resources and commitment, R&D, financial stability, client references) Total costs (acquisition, implementation, maintenance) Implementation and maintenance factors (availability and cost of 3rd party consulting and training services, proven methodologies for implementation and support, training plans and opportunities) Our Advisory Committee unanimously agreed that SAP offered the best fit with our project goals.

  11. Questions? Bill Reed reedb@nku.edu PRISM Project prism.nku.edu Northern Kentucky University www.nku.edu

More Related