870 likes | 1.1k Views
Neutrinos and Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays. Dmitry Semikoz MPI, Munich & INR, Moscow in collaboration with F.Aharonian, O.Kalashev, V.Kuzmin, A.Neronov and G.Sigl. Overview:. Introduction Experimental detection of high energy neutrinos: Under/ground/water/ice Horizontal air showers
E N D
Neutrinos and Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays Dmitry Semikoz MPI, Munich & INR, Moscow in collaboration with F.Aharonian, O.Kalashev, V.Kuzmin, A.Neronov and G.Sigl
Overview: • Introduction • Experimental detection of high energy neutrinos: • Under/ground/water/ice • Horizontal air showers • Radio detection • Acoustic signals from neutrinos • Neutrinos from UHECR protons • Neutrinos from AGN • Most probable neutrino sources • Neutrinos in exotic UHECR models • Conclusion
Extragalactic neutrino flux? • Only ~ 20 neutrinos with energy E~ 10-40 MeV from SN 1987A
Why UHE neutrinos can exist? • Protons are attractive candidates to be accelerated in astrophysical objects up to highest energies. • Neutrinos can be produced by protons in P+P -> pions or P+g-> pions reactions inside of astrophysical objects or in intergalactic space. • Neutrinos can be produced directly in decays of heavy particles. Same particles can be responsible for UHECR events above GZK cutoff.
Pion production n p Conclusion: proton, photon and neutrino fluxes are connected in well-defined way. If we know one of them we can predict other ones:
Neutrino – nucleon cross section • Proton density np~ 1024/cm3 • Distance R~104km • Cross section snN=1/(Rnp)~10-33cm2 • This happens at energy E~1015 eV. ~E0.4
Experimental detection of E<1017eV neutrinos • Neutrinos coming from above are secondary from cosmic rays • Neutrino coming from below are mixture of atmospheric neutrinos and HE neutrinos from space • Earth is not transparent for neutrinos E>1015eV • Experiments: MACRO, Baikal, AMANDA
Lake Baikal First underwater telescope First neutrinos underwater 4-string stage (1996)
AMANDA Super-K DUMAND depth Amanda-II: 677 PMTs at 19 strings (1996-2000) AMANDA-II
Experimental detection of UHE (E>1017eV) neutrinos • Neutrinos are not primary UHECR • Horizontal or up-going air showers – easy way to detect neutrinos • Experiments: Fly’s Eye, AGASA
e + n p + e- e- ... cascade negative charge is sweeped into developing shower, which acquires a negative net charge Qnet ~ 0.25 Ecascade (GeV). for >> 10 cm (radio) coherence relativist. pancake ~ 1cm thick, ~10cm each particle emits Cherenkov radiation C signal is resultant of overlapping Cherenkov cones C-signal ~ E2 nsec Threshold > 1016 eV
Lunar Radio Emissions from Inter- actions of and CR with > 1019 eV Gorham et al. (1999), 30 hr NASA Goldstone 70 m antenna + DSS 34 m antenna 1 nsec moon Earth E2·dN/dE < 105 eV·cm-2·s-1·sr-1 at 1020 eV GLUEGoldstone Lunar Ultra-high Energy Neutrino Experiment Effective target volume ~ antenna beam (0.3°) 10 m layer 105 km3
RICE Radio Ice Cherenkov Experiment South Pole firn layer (to 120 m depth) 20 receivers + transmitters UHE NEUTRINO DIRECTION E 2 · dN/dE < 10-4 GeV · cm-2 · s-1 · sr-1 at 1017 eV 300 METER DEPTH
d s P t R Particle cascade ionization heat pressure wave Maximum of emission at ~ 20 kHz Attenuation length of sea water at 15-30 kHz: a few km (light: a few tens of meters) → given a large initial signal, huge detection volumes can be achieved. Threshold > 1016 eV
Mediterranean Projects 2400m ANTARES 4100m 3400m NEMO NESTOR
NESTOR 1991 - 2000 R & D, Site Evaluation Summer 2002 Deployment 2 floors Winter 2003 Recovery & re-deployment with 4 floors Autumn 2003 Full Tower deployment 2004 Add 3 DUMAND strings around tower 2005 - ? Deployment of 7 NESTOR towers ANTARES 1996 - 2000 R&D, Site Evaluation 2000 Demonstrator line 2001 Start Construction September 2002 Deploy prototype line December 2004 10 (14?) line detector complete 2005 - ? Construction of km3 Detector NEMO 1999 - 2001 Site selection and R&D 2002 - 2004 Prototyping at Catania Test Site 2005 - ? Construction of km3 Detector
IceTop AMANDA South Pole 1400 m 2400 m IceCube - 80 Strings - 4800 PMT • Instrumented volume: 1 km3 • Installation: 2004-2010 ~ 80.000 atm. per year
ANITA AntarcticImpulsiveTransientArray Flight in 2006
SalSA SaltDomeShowerArray Natural Salt Domes Potential PeV-EeV Neutrino Detectors
Renewed efforts along acoustic method for GZK neutrino detection Greece: SADCO Mediterannean, NESTOR site, 3 strings with hydrophones Russia: AGAM antennas near Kamchatka: existing sonar array for submarine detection Russia: MG-10M antennas: withdrawn sonar array for submarine detection AUTEC: US Navy array in Atlantic: existing sonar array for submarine detection Antares: R&D for acoustic detection IceCube: R&D for acoustic detection
RICE AGASA Amanda, Baikal 2002 Anita 2004 AUGER nt AABN 2007 EUSO, OWL 2012 Auger Salsa km3 GLUE
Why neutrinos from UHE protons? • All experiments agree (up to factor 2) on UHECR flux below cutoff. All experiments see events above cutoff! • Majority of the air-showers are hadronic-like • Simplest solution for energies 5x1018 eV < E < 5x1019 eV: protons from uniformly distributed sources like AGNs.
Parameters which define diffuse neutrino flux • Proton spectrum from one source: • Distribution of sources: • Cosmological parameters:
Theoretical predictions of neutrino fluxes • WB bound: 1/E2 protons; distribution of sources – AGN; analytical calculation of one point near 1018 eV. • MPR bound: 1/E protons; distribution of sources – AGN; numerical calculation for dependence on Emax • The g-ray bound: EGRET
EGRET: diffuse gamma-ray flux The high energy gamma ray detector on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory (20 MeV - ~20 GeV)
Future detection of neutrinos from UHECR protons AGN,1/E Old sources 1/E^2
Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) Active galaxies produce vast amounts of energy from a very compact central volume. Prevailing idea: powered by accretion onto super-massive black holes (106 - 1010 solar masses). Different phenomenology primarily due to the orientation with respect to us. Models include energetic (multi-TeV), highly-collimated, relativistic particle jets. High energy g-rays emitted within a few degrees of jet axis. Mechanisms are speculative; g-rays offer a direct probe.
Photon background in core • Energy scale Eg= 0.1 – 10 eV • Time variability t ~ few days or R = 1016cm • Model: hot thermal radiation. T=10 eV T=1 eV