1 / 10

Living Donor Committee Spring 2014

Proposal To Modify Existing or Establish New Requirements for the Psychosocial and Medical Evaluation of all Living Donors. Living Donor Committee Spring 2014. The Problem. OPTN policy has inconsistent requirements for psychosocial and medical evaluation of living donors

teagan-stephens
Download Presentation

Living Donor Committee Spring 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposal To Modify Existing or Establish New Requirements for the Psychosocial and Medical Evaluation of all Living Donors Living Donor Committee Spring 2014

  2. The Problem • OPTN policy has inconsistent requirements for psychosocial and medical evaluation of living donors • Kidney donor recovery hospitals must follow OPTN policies • Liver donor recovery hospitals must develop and follow center-specific protocols • Hospitals performing living lung, intestine or pancreas donor recovery are not required to follow OPTN policy or develop and follow center-specific protocols

  3. Goal of the Proposal • Establish standardized psychosocial and medical evaluation requirements for all types of living donors that mirror existing requirements for living kidney donors • Improve the medical evaluation process for all future living donors

  4. How the Proposal will Achieve its Goal • Standardization of the psychosocial and medical evaluation process for all living donors

  5. Additional Background • Proposed requirements are based on recommendations from a Joint Societies Steering Committee • Committee representation from: • American Society of Transplantation (AST); • American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS); • North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)

  6. Supporting EvidenceLiving Donors in US by Volume and Type of Donor

  7. Proposal Summary • DTAC recommended minor changes to the required infectious disease testing • All references to “potential living donor” would be changed to read “living donor” • The majority of existing psychosocial and medical evaluation requirements for living kidney donors would be extended to all categories of living donors • No new requirements for living kidney donors

  8. Proposal Summary • New living liver donor medical evaluation requirements are provided in Table 14-8 • New living liver donors exclusion criteria include: • HCV RNA positive, HBsAg positive • Donors with ZZ, Z-null, null-null and S-null alpha-1-antitrypsinphenotypes and untype-able phenotypes • Expected donor remnant volume less than 30% of native liver volume • Prior living liver donor

  9. What Members will Need to Do • Living donor recovery centers must follow new policies for the psychosocial and medical evaluation of living donors

  10. Questions? • Christie Thomas, M.D. Committee Chairchristie-thomas@uiowa.edu • Name Region # Representativeemail address • Lee Bolton Committee Liaisonlee.bolton@unos.org

More Related