MPPDA Research Committee

1. MPPDA Research Committee MPPDA Annual Meeting Nashville 2013

2. Why research for Med-Peds? • Insert plug to join the research committee here.

3. Members • Michael Aronica MD, Chair, SUNY Buffalo • Bob Hopkins MD, U Arkansas • Ronald Williams, Penn State • Princess Dennar, Tulane • Steve Strausbaugh, Case Western • DepakPalaksheppa, MGH • Patrice Thibodeau, Maine • Sharon Wretzel, Baystate • AnoopAgrawal, Baylor • Jen Lindstrom, Albany

4. Review of Charges • Developing a “gate-keeping” process such that all surveys and research data requests of the MPPDA membership are vetted by the committee. • Maintaining a database of publications authored by members of or about Med-Peds programs • Updating the annual survey of Med-Peds Program Obtaining IRB approval with expectations of publishing data obtained in the annual program survey • Submitting at least 1 (one) manuscript yearly for publication • Creating an environment for Med-Peds collaborative research among programs • Keeping a list of active committee members for yearly submission to the Executive Committee for documentation of participation • Preparing and presenting quarterly reports to the Executive Committee, including strategies for meeting objectives not currently met.

5. Deliverables for 2012-2013 • Fourth Annual Med-Peds program Survey in Summer. • Format Med-Peds Bibliography • Compile list of Med-Peds graduates from each program and AAP Med-Peds Section

6. Long Term goals for the MPPDA research Committee • Obtain annual MPPDA national survey data with analysis and survey revision. • Support MPPDA in data collection for executive committee initiatives • Improving research networking and development of a National Med-Peds PBRN  • Increase and support Med-Peds faculty publication

7. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey • Program Characteristics • Recruitment • Program/Program Director Support • Ambulatory Training • Board Certification • Graduates • Curriculum & Transitional committees • Miscellaneous

8. Annual Program Survey • Survey conducted during Summer 2012 • Contacts emails were found from MPPDA & ACGME databases • SurveyMonkey survey method • 62 out of 77 programs responded (81% response rate)

9. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program Characteristics Mean number Resident/Faculty FTE = 2.9 (’10/’11 = 2.4/2.2)

10. ACGME Sponsoring Institution Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program Characteristics

11. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support

12. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support PD Gender: 57% Male (‘10/’11 = 55/52% male) Have an APD: 61% of programs (‘10/11= 66/68) Have a separate/own Program administrator: 82% of programs (‘10/’11 = 82/79%) Have a Med-Peds Chief Resident: 93% of Programs (‘10/’11 = 87/87%) Have a PD controlled Budget: 65% of Programs (‘10/’11 = 57/63%)

13. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Program/Program Director Support Ambulatory PD’s decreased from 42% to 37% from 2009. Hospitalist PD’s increased from 11% – 16%.

14. 24 Programs have at least 1 NCQA certified ambulatory clinic Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Ambulatory Training

15. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Graduates

16. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Miscellaneous • Programs with access to a handoff curriculum: 91% • Patient safety curriculum: • Own Program runs: 7% • Core Programs run: 70% • Institution Runs: 57%

17. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Academic Productivity • Program Director • Manuscripts: 1.6/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1) • Poster Presentations: 1.7/Program +/- 2.4 (median = 1) • Oral Presentations: 2.2/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2) • Residents • Manuscripts: 2.9/Program +/- 3.1 (median = 2) • Poster Presentations: 5.2/Program +/- 4.3 (median = 4.5) • Oral Presentations: 3.8/Program +/- 3.7 (median = 3)

18. Annual Med-Peds Program Survey: Changes for 2013 NAS support questions Data on graduates who fail the certification exams