200 likes | 276 Views
Policy & Research Committee. EFRTC General Meeting Sofia, 16 November 2012. Jeremy Candfield Chairman, & RIA Director General . CONTENT. Market Strategy event 2 October P & R Committee meeting 19 October CER Infrastructure Interest Group 4 th railway package – role of IMs
E N D
Policy & Research Committee EFRTC General Meeting Sofia, 16 November 2012 Jeremy Candfield Chairman, & RIA Director General
CONTENT • Market Strategy event 2 October • P & R Committee meeting 19 October • CER Infrastructure Interest Group • 4th railway package – role of IMs • Joint Technology Initiative • ERRAC and future research • AUTOMAIN workshop EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Market strategy event (1) • European Parliament breakfast briefing 2 October, and launch of the Market Strategies Report • “A win-win strategy for suppliers and customers: What is the rail sector doing on rail infrastructure maintenance to become more efficient?” • Organised by the CER • Hosted by MEP and Member of the European Parliament Transport and Tourism Committee, Ms. Ines Ayala SENDER EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Market strategy event (2) • Briefing room packed. Decision takers and influencers: MEPs, two senior Commission officials, experts from the EU institutions, the EIM, Infrastructure Managers and Railway Undertakings, railway industry, well-known consultants and journalists – about 60 people in all • Successful event increasing EFRTC visibility with the European institutions and partnership with other important railway stakeholders EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Market strategies report • Introduction to the subject by Mr Jeremy Candfield as EFRTC P & R Chairman and RIA Director General • Presentation of the report by Mr. Steve Featherstone, Track Programme Director of NR on behalf of EIM • CER comments by Mr Rudolf Koller, Austrian Infrastructure Manager • Event moderated by CER CEO Mr Libor Lochmann • Lively discussion – c40 minutes • Report on www.efrtc.org “EVENTS” EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Key Message taken from the Report: • Collaboration between IMs and Contractors Saves Money • Available at www.efrtc.org under the Events folder • So where to next? EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
CER Infrastructure Interest Group (IIG) • At P&R 19 October, EFRTC invited to the next IIG meeting on 4 December 2012 • Chaired by Mr Rudolf Köller with participation of integrated IMs such as DB, SNCF, PKP/PLK, ÖBB, and all CEEC • EFRTC Chairman and Secretary General will attend • Work on long-term funding to be discussed; also believed relevant to EIM • Very relevant to contractors; hopefully next work package EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
CER Infrastructure Interest Group • CER IIG Activities • Three main streams as shown at P&R Committee: • Commission driven issues • CER driven issues • Monitoring issues EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Overview CER infrastructureactivities Commission driven issuesssues CER driven issues Monitoring issues TEN-T Review Quality and Performance in rail infrastructure* Noise Protection Implementation ot the Freight Corridor Regulation Implementation of the „White Paper“* Asset Management (Marketing) Infrastructure TSI Future of railway system* Weatherproof Infrastructure Recast of the First Railway Package Infrastructure Financing Technical Innovation 4. Railway Package Track Access Charges Longer and heavier trains MFF (Multiannual Financial Framework) Infrastructure Statistics Infrastructure & Climate Change Training EU funding increasing results* *= new CER activity
Infrastructure performance indicators • In cooperation with UIC, CER is launching a data collection on the performance, efficiency and quality of IMs, focusing on: • Quarterly performance monitoring • Punctuality of operators • Reliability of infrastructure • This data will be used to demonstrate the positive development of the rail sector over time • CER also collects data on total expenditure on rail infrastructure, broken down by running expenditures, renewals, and new construction • IMs would also appreciate reliability and punctuality data from contractors Better reliability and punctuality statistics from IMs and contractors would bring added-value to all
Total Public and non-Public Expenditure on Infrastructure (in EUR million)
And much focus on.... • The 4th Railway Package • Is about market opening – ‘competition in rail’ • Vital for contractors to be aware of key issues affecting their major customers • Some of the key issues recently identified by the European Commission: EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Problems identified in the governance of infrastructure managers: Efficiency Efficiency challenge: • Railway infrastructure is a naturalmonopoly • The currentgovernancedoes not providesufficientincentives to respond to the needs of users • No incentives for European and intermodal cooperation • The current EU rulesallow a splitting up of functionswhichdoes not allow infrastructure managers to fulfiltheirtasks • Examples: - path allocation vs maintenance and development • - charging and maintenance
Problems identified in the governance of infrastructure managers: Equal Access • Existingseparationrequirements do not preventconflicts of interests • Discrimination potentialfromfunctions not currentlydefined as essential functions • Competitiveadvantagesflowingfrom information asymmetries • Persistent risk of cross-subsidisationwithoutcompletefinancialtransparency NB.: If properlydesigned, no evidencethatseparated structure is more expensivethanintegrated model
Objectives of the Commission's proposal • On the efficiency issue: • - Encourage appropriatecooperationbeteween IM and RUs, but on an equal basis • - Ensure IM has all functionsneeded to run the infrastruc- • ture in an optimised, efficient and non–discriminatorymanner • On the equalaccess issue: • Define the minimum appropriatedegree of separation of the IM from rail operators • Ensurethat all IM activitieswhich are potential sources of conflicts of interest are subject to separationrequirements
Definingwhichadditionalfunctions must beunder the responsibility of a unified IM Subject all IM functions to separationrequirementsSeparationwhichguaranteesat least legal, economic and financialindependencefromRUs and sets as objective institutionalindependence
IM functions • a) Infrastructure development (planning, financing and building) • b) Infrastructure marketing and charging (determination and collection of charges, relations with customers) • c) Infrastructure operations (path allocation, timetabling, traffic management, control command and signalling as well as traffic information services). • d) Infrastructure maintenance (infrastructure upgrade and renewal, asset management activities).
Joint Technology Initiative • UNIFE will report later on this proposal to EU for funding railway research • Total project costs will be up to 800 million Euro for 4 years i.e. 200 million/year with 50 % funding from EU • Project has 5 main streams – one on Infrastructure i.e. up to 20 million EU funding for infrastructure research/year • Another 20 millions shall be from industry and IMs as in kind contribution by resources allocated to project • EFRTC and its members/companies are invited to join EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
ERRAC and EC research • ERRAC structure is changing and new Terms of Reference shall be submitted to the next Plenary meeting on 23.11.2012 • EFRTC Board support the appointment of EFRTC Secretary General in the future ERRAC strategic body • ERRAC shall play an advisory role to JTI by forming ERRAC Pre-“Requirements and Implementation groups” for SHIFT²RAIL Innovation Programmes • SG will consult EFRTC members/companies for joining the implementation group for infrastructure project • Proposal for the new EU project on infrastructure developments in horizon up to 2050 is under preparation • More by SG on proposal and AUTOMAIN workshop EFRTC GM, Sofia 16.11.2012, Policy and Research Committee
Policy & Research Committee Thank you for your attention