480 likes | 692 Views
Real World Cloud Application Security chan@netflix.com. About Me. Director of Engineering @ Netflix Responsible for: Cloud app, product, infrastructure, ops security Previously: Led security team @ VMware Earlier, primarily security consulting at @stake, iSEC Partners. Netflix, Inc.
E N D
About Me • Director of Engineering @ Netflix • Responsible for: • Cloud app, product, infrastructure, ops security • Previously: • Led security team @ VMware • Earlier, primarily security consulting at @stake, iSEC Partners
Netflix, Inc. “Netflix is the world’s leading Internet television network with more than 33 million members in 40 countries enjoying more than one billion hours of TV shows and movies per month, including original series . . .” Source: http://ir.netflix.com
Lots of Good Advice • BSIMM • Microsoft SDL • SAFECode
But, what works? Forrester Consulting, 12/10
Especially, given phenomena such as DevOps, cloud, agile, and the unique characteristics of an organization?
Netflix Culture “may well be the most important document ever to come out of the Valley.” Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook COO
On the way to the cloud . . . (organization) (or NoOps, depending on definitions)
Lots of watching in prime time Not as much in early morning Old way - pay and provision for peak, 24/7/365 A common graph @ Netflix Weekend afternoon ramp-up Multiply this pattern across the dozens of apps that comprise the Netflix streaming service
Autoscaling • Goals: • # of systems matches load requirements • Load per server is constant • Happens without intervention (the ‘auto’ in autoscaling) • Results: • Clusters continuously add & remove nodes • New nodes must mirror existing
Every change requires a new cluster push (not an incremental change to existing systems)
Deploying code must be easy (it is)
RPM with app-specific bits VM template ready to launch Perforce/Git Bakery/Aminator ASG AMI YUM Code change Config change Base image + RPM Cluster config Running systems Netflix Deployment Pipeline
Operational Impact • No changes to running systems • No systems mgmt infrastructure (Puppet, Chef, etc.) • Fewer logins to prod • No snowflakes • Trivial “rollback”
Security Impact • Need to think differently on: • Vulnerability management • Patch management • User activity monitoring • File integrity monitoring • Forensic investigations
Architecture, organization, deploymentare all different. What about security?
We’ve adapted too. Some principles we’ve found useful.
Points of Emphasis • Integrate • Make the right way easy • Self-service, with exceptions • Trust, but verify • Two contexts: • Integration with your engineering ecosystem • Integration of your security controls • Organization • SCM, build and release • Monitoring and alerting
Integration: Base AMI Testing • Base AMI – VM/instance template used for all cloud systems • Average instance age = ~24 days (one-time sample) • The base AMI is managed like other packages, via P4, Jenkins, etc. • We watch the SCM directory & kick off testing when it changes • Launch an instance of the AMI, perform vuln scan and other checks SCAN COMPLETED ALERT Site name: AMI1 Stopped by: N/A Total Scan Time: 4 minutes 46 seconds Critical Vulnerabilities: 5 Severe Vulnerabilities: 4 Moderate Vulnerabilities: 4
Integration: Control Packaging and Installation • From the RPM spec file of a webserver: Requires: osseccloudpassagenflx-base-harden hyperguard-enforcer • Pulls in the following RPMs: • HIDS agent • Config assessment/firewall agent • Host hardening package • WAF
Integration: Timeline (Chronos) • What IP addresses have been blacklisted by the WAF in the last few weeks? • GET /api/v1/event?timelines=type:blacklist&start=20130125000000000 • Which security groups have changed today? • GET /api/v1/event?timelines=type:securitygroup&start=20130206000000000
Integration: Static Analysis • Available self-service through build environment • FindBugs, PMD • Jenkins plugin to display graphs and support drill through to results
Points of Emphasis • Integrate • Make the right way easy • Self-service, with exceptions • Trust, but verify • Developers are lazy
Making it Easy: Cryptex • Crypto: DDIY (“Don’t Do It Yourself”) • Many uses of crypto in web/distributed systems: • Encrypt/decrypt (cookies, data, etc.) • Sign/verify (URLs, data, etc.) • Netflix also uses heavily for device activation, DRM playback, etc.
Making it Easy: Cryptex • Multi-layer crypto system (HSM basis, scale out layer) • Easy to use • Key management handled transparently • Access control and auditable operations
Making it Easy: Cloud-Based SSO • In the AWS cloud, access to data center services is problematic • Examples: AD, LDAP, DNS • But, many cloud-based systems require authN, authZ • Examples: Dashboards, admin UIs • Asking developers to securely handle/accept credentials is also problematic
Making it Easy: Cloud-Based SSO • Solution: Leverage OneLoginSaaSSSO (SAML) used by IT for enterprise apps (e.g. Workday, Google Apps) • Provides a single & centralized login page • Built base module to make SSO/authN trivial
Points of Emphasis • Integrate • Make the right way easy • Self-service, with exceptions • Trust, but verify • Self-service is perhaps the most transformative cloud characteristic • Failing to adopt this for security controls will lead to friction
Self-Service: Security Groups • Asgard cloud orchestration tool allows developers to configure their own firewall rules • Limited to same AWS account, no IP-based rules
Points of Emphasis • Integrate • Make the right way easy • Self-service, with exceptions • Trust, but verify • Culture precludes traditional “command and control” approach • Organizational desire for agile, DevOps, CI/CD blur traditional security engagement touchpoints
Trust but Verify: Security Monkey • Cloud APIs make verification and analysis of configuration and running state simpler • Security Monkey created as the framework for this analysis • Includes: • Certificate checking • Firewall analysis • IAM entity analysis • Limit warnings • Resource policy analysis
Trust but Verify: Security Monkey From: Security Monkey Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:08:18 +0000 To: Security Alerts Subject: prod Changes Detected Table of Contents: Security Groups Changed Security Group <sgname> (eu-west-1 / prod) <#Security Group/<sgname> (eu-west-1 / prod)>
Trust but Verify: Exploit Monkey • AWS Autoscalinggroup is unit of deployment, so changes signal a good time to rerun dynamic scans On 10/23/12 12:35 PM, Exploit Monkey wrote: I noticed that testapp-live has changed current ASG name from testapp-live-v001 to testapp-live-v002. I'm starting a vulnerability scan against test app from these private/public IPs: 10.29.24.174
Takeaways • Netflix runs a large, dynamic service in AWS • Newer concepts like cloud & DevOpsneed an updated approach to application security • Specific context can help jumpstart a pragmatic and effective security program • Don’t swim upstream - integrate and collaborate with your engineering partners
Netflix References • http://netflix.github.com • http://techblog.netflix.com • http://slideshare.net/netflix
Other References • http://www.webpronews.com/netflix-outage-angers-customers-2008-08 • http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2395372,00.asp • http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/etech_amazon_cto_aws.php • http://bsimm.com/online/ • http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/confirmation.aspx?id=29884 • http://www.slideshare.net/reed2001/culture-1798664 • http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/31/read-what-facebooks-sandberg-calls-maybe-the-most-important-document-ever-to-come-out-of-the-valley/ • http://www.gauntlt.org
Questions? ? chan@netflix.com