140 likes | 160 Views
LAKMA Film Screenings. Loreta Zavadskienė Analysis of the Feedback Results 27 February, 2015. Event Organisation. Preparation for film series Feedback Follow-up ideas. Preparation for film series. Consulting with Spanish partners + diagnosing situation in Lithuania
E N D
LAKMA Film Screenings Loreta Zavadskienė Analysis of the Feedback Results 27 February, 2015
Event Organisation • Preparation for film series • Feedback • Follow-up ideas
Preparation for film series • Consulting with Spanish partners + diagnosing situation in Lithuania • Venue: Embassy of United States in Lithuania + surprise • Every second Friday of each month • Criteria for film selection • Films made after literary works • Recognised + interesting • Format: Introduction + Screening + Discussion • Ways of information dissemination
Feedback: Questionnaire • How did you find out about this event? • Why did you choose to attend this event? • What do you think of the venue for the event? • What do you think of the format of the event? Consider 3 parts: introduction, film show, discussion. • Overall, have your expectations been met? Why/Why not? • Are you going to attend the next 3 film shows? If so, would you like to get a certificate for the 4 sessions? • What advice could you give to the organisers of such events?
Feedback: Results (1) • 37 registered => 24 (19 + 3 + 2) participated = 65% • A wide range of educational levels/sectors represented • Sources of info about the event • Email from LAKMA - 8 • Friend who is member of LAKMA - 6 • LAKMA President personally - 3 • Email from my boss - 1 • LAKMA advert at university - 1
Feedback: Results (2) • Why did you choose to attend this event? • To see the movie - 7(37%) + (like the ones based on literature works; meet new people) • Like films – 8(42%) + (good chance to improve English) • Looking for ideas to be applied in class – 2 (10%) • English discussion – 1 (5%) • To support LAKMA – 1 (5%) • Searching contact with Embassy • What do you think of the venue for the event? • Perfect – 4(21%) • OK – 14(74%) (“… had to wait outside because of security”; “… only security too strict”) • Good but could be different – 1(5%)
Feedback: Results (3) • What do you think of the format of the event? Consider 3 parts: introduction, film show, discussion. • Good – 15 (79%) (interesting, especially intro; useful; good sound and view; smooth show; intro and discussion are not necessary) • Perfect – 2 (10,5%) • No time for discussion - 2 (10,5%) (maybe next time; too long an intro) • Overall, have your expectations been met? Why/Why not? • Yes 16 (84%) (interesting and useful) • Expected more • No – no discussion • I hated this film
Feedback: Results (4) • Are you going to attend the next 3 film shows? • Yes – 17 (89%) • Not sure – 2 (11%) • If so, would you like to get a certificate for the 4 sessions? • Yes – 15 (79%) • Not necessary – 1 • No answer - 3
Feedback: Results (5) • What advice could you give to the organisers of such events? • Everything is OK - 14 (74%) (“It was interesting and I had a great evening.”; “Everything is perfect, thanks.”; “I want to say thank you.”; “Thank you for what you’re doing.”; “Good luck”) • To start a bit earlier – 2 (11%) • Choose better films + Choose more wholesome films • Short speech before event
Follow-up ideas • Filming • Sharing • Teleconferencing?
Future Events • The Great Gatsby • ???