260 likes | 388 Views
Pulsar Searching + Receivers. Matthew Bailes (CAASTRO), FPGAs: Peter Mc Mahon, Terry Fibila, Jonathon Kocz. CPUs: Willem van Straten, Andrew Jameson , Mike Keith GPUs: Ben Barsdell + HITRUN team (Science! & Search coding). Crab pulsar. Pulsars go this way.
E N D
Pulsar Searching+ Receivers Matthew Bailes (CAASTRO), FPGAs: Peter Mc Mahon, Terry Fibila, Jonathon Kocz. CPUs: Willem van Straten, Andrew Jameson, Mike Keith GPUs: Ben Barsdell + HITRUN team (Science! & Search coding)
Crab pulsar Pulsars go this way Magnetic Field - Period Diagram “Noisy” “Smooth”
HITRUN Pulsar Surveys (Keith et al. 2010) • Digital Versions of the Parkes MB Surveys • 13 x 1024 x 64 us • Medium-Latitude Survey (540s) • Ultra-deep Survey (4000s) • All-sky Survey (260s) • Better for high-DM MSPs • Better for Lorimer bursts • Better for RRATs • Deeper than old surveys
Berkeley-Parkes-Swinburne-Recorder“BPSR” Dedicated fibre 5 TB/day
MSPs • HITRUN: 27 MSPs • P-ALFA: 15 MSPs? • MSP with a main sequence companion • (PSR J1903+0327)? • FERMI-Related: ~50MSPs • Mostly short-period and many close • GBT Drift 350 MHz: >6 MSPs?? • MSP occasionally super-bright
A Jupiter-mass “Planet” Pulsar Mc~ 0.001 Mo Porb~ 0.0907d D ~ 1.2 kpc?
RAW Cleaned
Dan Thornton (U Manchester)DM >> Lorimer Burst ! Well off galactic plane. One beam Only Instrumentation Perfect Allows detailed studies
In future capable of finding in real time Heimdall plot of Thornton’s burst.
Burst Profile ~50 sigma Scatter Tail (nu^-4.0(4) Freq index -2.000(6)
Search SNR PSR flux
Computational complexity PSR flux
Conclusions • Wideband feed complements the MB: • Good for point sources • Good for follow-ups • Limited RFI excision? Parallel system? • PAF: • Tsys/Aeff critical: 2x MB (marginal) 1x MB (excellent) • MultiBeam: • Currently #1 instrument for PSR and Burst surveys • RFI excision should be mirrored on PAFs?
Peryton Examples (Burke-Spolaor et al) Ugly, Fat.