1 / 8

International Self-Report Delinquency Project (ISRD3)

International Self-Report Delinquency Project (ISRD3). Ms Reana Bezić , Admin. Assistant of the MPPG. About the Project. O n-going study : ISRD1 : 1990-1991 ; ISRD2 : 2005-2007; ISRD3 : 2012-2013 (Croatia) Goals: - d ifferences / similarities between countries

teleri
Download Presentation

International Self-Report Delinquency Project (ISRD3)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. International Self-Report Delinquency Project (ISRD3) Ms ReanaBezić, Admin. Assistant of the MPPG

  2. About the Project • On-going study: ISRD1: 1990-1991;ISRD2: 2005-2007; ISRD3: 2012-2013 (Croatia) • Goals: - differences/similaritiesbetweencountries - explore/test theoretical issues related to juvenile delinquency • Research design: - city-based survey conducted in school settings among pupils in grades 7th, 8th and 9th (age group is 13-16) • Two versions of questionnaire: paper-and-pencil and computerized (online)

  3. Croatia • Under the leadership of Dr. Anna-Maria Getoš • Two cities: Zagreb and Varaždin • Randomly selected elementary and secondary schools • Version of questionnaire: paper-and-pencil • Consent: MZOS and parental • Data collection: between April and May, 2013.

  4. Basic Results • Cities: Zagreb and Varaždin-obstacles and problems • Gender:similar to comparison on national level

  5. Basic Results

  6. Basic Results

  7. FuturePlans • Need for continuing the survey next year • More cooperative local officials • Necessity for comparing the results between the states

  8. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

More Related