100 likes | 218 Views
Structure. The Family FundBackgroundThe project (Aims
E N D
1. Measuring the Participation of Families with Disabled ChildrenESRC User Fellowship Mark Woolley, Family Fund
Seraphim Alvanides & Rob Forsyth
University of Newcastle
2. Structure The Family Fund
Background
The project (Aims & Methods)
Benefits to the User Fellow
3. The Family Fund Independent charity established over 30 years ago in the wake of the Thalidomide crisis distributes public monies
Provides grants to families with severely disabled children aged up to 16 and living in the UK (46,000 in 2005/06)
Receives in excess of 55,000 applications per year
Holds a database of 172,000 families and 201,000 children
Database growth of around 8,000 families per year.
4. Background What factors led Applications Officers to award rather than reject a grant application
Was there a way of comparing severity of autism with cerebral palsy given the very different natures of these disabilities
Could the Fund demonstrate the value of its grants in terms of increased levels of participation?
5. Background University of Newcastle: work on investigating the environment of children with cerebral palsy had been carried out using an instrument known as ECEQ (European Child Environment Questionnaire). The ECEQ captures the environment across the domains of:
Physical facilities/attributes
Services
Attitudes in the home and wider family
Educational setting
Health setting
Attitudes in the wider community
The Fund commissioned a project with a sample size of 600 to whom the ECEQ was distributed
On analysis it became apparent that different areas of the UK displayed very different ECEQ values although no obvious relationships to indicators of multiple deprivation were found. Hence, the current project.
8. Research question
Do levels of participation vary according to context for example the Local Authority area within which a disabled child lives?
9. Methodology Questionnaire based survey incorporating the Health Utilities Index (HUI) and the ECEQ 76 questions encompassing health related variables such as vision, hearing, dexterity and mobility and environment questions across the domains of support, physical accessibility of the environment, public transport, educational provision and attitudes of family and friends
Sample of 10,000 children across the UK drawn from the Family Fund database
Creation of average enablement scores which can be mapped across the UK allowing for identification of pockets with high or low scores
Comparison of patterns of scores with standard
performance data published by Local Authorities
10. Benefits to the User Fellowand the Participants Time & Training for a Family Fund employee
Update on Research Methodology
Advanced Statistics & GIS training
Time & space for Reading & Reflection
Instil research ethos & build analytical capacity
Potential for further collaboration between the Family Fund and the University of Newcastle
Cutting edge research publications
Possibility for ESRC-CASE application
11. The Team Mark Woolley, User Fellow
maw@familyfund.org.uk
Seraphim Alvanides, Joint Principal Investigator
s.alvanides@newcastle.ac.uk
Rob Forsyth, Joint Principal Investigator