1 / 12

Understanding Hurricane Response for Improved Stakeholder/User Reaction

This article discusses the importance of integrating social science in hurricane response efforts. It highlights studies that examine household evacuation decision-making, assess societal impacts of hurricane forecasts, and explore communication channels and comprehension of hurricane warnings. The goal is to improve the provision of clear and actionable information to users and enhance stakeholder reactions for more effective response.

tellez
Download Presentation

Understanding Hurricane Response for Improved Stakeholder/User Reaction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding Hurricane Response for Improved Stakeholder/User Reaction David Caldwell, Director Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 64th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference March 2010

  2. Social Science and the NWSPotential Benefits Goals: Better understand societal response to NWS forecasts and warnings Apply this understanding towards provision of clear, actionable information, geared towards user need Interdisciplinary interactions willenhance this information, e.g,: Sociology Economics Communication Move the NWS from a goodagency to a greatagency 2

  3. Integrating Social Science:Why Now? For the 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons: - Hurricane forecasts were accurate and timely - And yet there was $175B and more than 5000 deaths in the Atlantic Basin - Many did not (or were not able to) heed warnings - Could our messages have been framed to ensure more timely and effective response? 2004 2005 3

  4. Integrating Social ScienceWhy Now? Where We Stand: There is little empirical information available on: - Watch/warning use in evacuation decision making - Economic value of current forecasts - How the public and partners receive and act upon NWS information 4

  5. 1)Household Evacuation Decision-making and the Benefits of Improved Hurricane Forecasting: Developing a Framework for Assessment (NCAR-SIP and NOAA - completed) Examined perception of hurricane forecasts/warnings Assessed potential value of improved information - Focused on evacuation decisions Assessed viability of survey methods Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 5

  6. 2) Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) Socio-Economic Impacts Assessment (NCAR-SIP in collaboration with HFIP – underway) Assess EM’s needs for and use of intensity information Assessing how households use intensity forecasts Appling broad social science findings to HFIP project with NCAR Societal Impacts Program Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 6

  7. Collaborative Research: Examining the Hurricane Warning System: Content, Channels, Comprehension (NCAR-SIP, Jamie Rhome,NHC, Mark DeMaria, NESDIS, Gene Hafele, MIC, WFO Houston – underway) Hurricane advisory/warning development process/content Study channels of communication among: Forecasters Electronic media EM community Public Reactions of coastal and at-risk populations Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 7

  8. Warning Decisions in Extreme Weather Events: An Integrated Multi-Method Approach (NCAR-SIP, L. Mooney, WFO Denver/Boulder, Retired - underway) Roles of uncertainty in warning process Dissemination of uncertainty info Impacts on decision-making Factors impacting decision making during extreme events Characterize public preferences for different attributes of forecast and warning information. Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 8

  9. Investigation of Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans: National Weather Service Environmental Risk Communications across Cultures (NOAA NWS Office of Communications - underway) - Study focused on communicating risk to diverse, vulnerable populations Investigating the role various cultural variables (race/ethnicity, culture, socioeconomic status, and geography) play when communicating risk. - Produce communication training on expressing risk across cultures Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 9

  10. Assessing Current Storm Surge Information from the Public Perspective (NOAA NWS Office of Communications – funding requested) Explore/assess public awareness and understanding of storm surge and associated information Determine needed approaches to improve communication and support decision-making with respect to extra- tropical and tropical cyclone storm surge Integrating Social Science:Example Studies 10

  11. We must find ways to integrate social science into our forecast and warning mission so we can: Improve call-to-action statements to achieve intended response Improve expression of uncertainty in our information Better understand the economic value/estimation of forecast improvements Better communicate risk Better understand how social networks effectuate response (race/ethnicity, culture, socioeconomic status) Improve web design that enables us to more effectively convey the message Effectively use social media Integrating Social Science:Where do We Go From Here? 11

  12. NOAA’s National Weather Service is engaging social science experts to: Improve information and services Reach out to diverse at-risk populations Communicate more clearly - Improve societal response to save lives Enhance critical partnerships with EMs, media, and the private sector" Integrating Social Science:Summary 12

More Related