260 likes | 357 Views
Textbook Problems Page 686. Page 686 Problem 1. NCG is $35,000 -- $15,000 @ 28% = 4,200 $20,000 @ 15% = 3,000 -- $22,200* *$7,200 (see (b) above) + $15,000 (30% X 50,000). Page 686 Problem 2. -- $10,000 -- LTCG ($5,000 28% / $5,000 15%) - 5,000 -- LTCL ($5,000 28%)
E N D
Page 686 Problem 1 • NCG is $35,000 • -- • $15,000 @ 28% = 4,200 • $20,000 @ 15% = 3,000 • -- • $22,200* *$7,200 (see (b) above) + $15,000 (30% X 50,000)
Page 686 Problem 2 • -- $10,000 -- LTCG ($5,000 28% / $5,000 15%) - 5,000 -- LTCL ($5,000 28%) = 5,000 -- NCG @ 15% • -- $10,000 -- LTCG ($5,000 28% / $5,000 15%) - 5,000 -- LTCL ($5,000 15%) = 5,000 -- NCG @ 28% Capital gains and losses are first netted within each class (28% or 5%/15%)
Page 686 Problem 2 • -- $10,000 -- NLTCG ($5,000 28% / $5,000 15%) - 5,000 -- NSTCL = 5,000 -- NCG @ 15%* * STCL offsets 28% rate LTCG first (the highest rate LTCG) per Code Sec 1(h)(5)(B)(ii)
Page 686 Problem 2 • -- $15,000 -- LTCG ($5K 28% / $5K 25% / $5K 15%) - 10,000 -- LTCL 15% = 5,000 -- NCG @ 25%* * The first $5,000 of 15% rate loss offsets gains within the same class (15%), then it offsets capital gains at the highest rate (28%). Note that the ordering rules are generally taxpayer friendly.
Page 691 Problem Note, technically capital losses are limited to capital gains + $3,000; in practice, we first net the losses against the gains. • Situation 1 - $4,000 -- NLTCL ($2,000 – $6,000) + 1,600 -- NSTCG ($2,600 - $1,000) = - 2,400 -- NLTCL The entire ($2,400) NLTCL would be allowed in the current year; no carryover
Page 691 Problem Situation 2 - $8,000 -- NLTCL ($2,000 – $10,000) - 2,000 -- NSTCL ($2,000 - $4,000) Current year capital loss of ($3,000) consisting of ($2,000) STCL and ($1,000) LTCL. The carryover of ($7,000) is all LTCL. The ($7,000) carryover LTCL is treated as loss in the 28% class per Code Sec. 1(h)(4)(B(iii).
Must an Individual Use $3,000 of Capital Loss Against Ordinary Income? • Assume Taxable Income of $1,000 prior to a $2,000 personal exemption under Section 151 and prior to consideration of capital losses during the year. Code Secs. 1212(b)(2)(A)(ii) and (B) • Assume: • ($8,000) NLTCL (2,000 LTCG – 10,000 LTCL) ($2,000) NSTCL (2,000 STCG – 4,000 STCL) • Result: • Use ($1,000) of STCL in current year (wasted) • Carryover ($9,000).
Page 708 Problem • Creditor (it appears that the note is a capital asset to the creditor/investor): • Realized gain of $1,000 ($5,000 – 4,000) • Character of recognized gain: ordinary income per Hudson. No “sale or exchange” by the creditor. The debtor merely paid the debt.
Page 708 Problem • Code Sec 1271(a) declares that amounts received by the holder on retirement of any debt instrument shall be considered in exchange therefor. • Does Sec 1271(a) apply? No, Sec 1271(b) declares that this “section shall not apply to– an obligation issued by a natural person before June 9, 1997” and this was issued in 1996.
Page 708 Problem • Debtor: • Gain Realized of $3,000 ($5,000 amount realized from debt discharge minus adjusted basis of GM stock). (Old Colony Trust, and Crane). • Character of $3,000 gain realized: Debtor has an exchange under Kenan so the gain is capital gain (sale of stock, a capital asset).
Problem 1 (a) • $1,000 LTCG. Held more than 1 year. Ignore the acquisition date and count the date of disposition (the acquisition and sale dates are the trade date not the settlement date for stock). Count both January 16 year 1 and January 16 year 2 (over 1 year). Explained in Rev Rul 66-7 (although the ruling dealt with a more than 6 month holding period).
Problem 1 (b) • $1,000 STCG. The start date is the day after the acquisitoin date (March 1 of year one). The date of sale is also counted – Feb. 29. • This is exactly one year (not more than one year); therefore, the gain is STCG.
Problem 1 (c) • $1,000 LTCG. Where the taxpayer cannot actually identify which block of stock is sold, Regs 1.1223-1(i) and 1.1012-1(c) provide a FIFO rule. • Feb 11 to Feb 15 is clearly more than 1 year. • Adequate identification is discussed in Rev Rul 72-415.
Problem 1 (d) • Probably $1,000 LTCG. Assuming the broker immediately placed the trades on the days T told the broker to buy and sell, T’s trade dates are December 29, year 1 (acquisition date) and December 30 year 2 (sale date). • December 30 to December 30 is more than 1 year.
Problem 1 (d) • What year is the gain recognized? The stock was not delivered to the third party buyer until year 3. • Even though T is a cash basis taxpayer, IRS requires T to include the income on December 30 of year two – the “trade date.” Rev Rul 93-84.
Problem 1 (e) • $500 LTCL. Again the “trade date” controls the timing of recognition (and amount) of the loss. Rev Rul 93-84.
Problem 1 (f) • $3,000 LTCG to Son. Section 1223(2) provides for tacking holding periods when there is a transferred basis under Code Sec 1015. • Note, the son actually held the stock for less than 1 year. Also, the son’s $3,000 LTCG may be taxed at 5% (instead of 15%) if the son does not have much other income and he is 18 years of age or older by year end (the new Kiddie tax threshhold).
Problem 1 (g) • $10,000 LTCG to T. • Under Code Sec 1014 the stock gets a DOD FMV; no gain to father or father’s estate. • On inherited property, the holding period is always long term (over 12 months) per Code Sec. 1223(9).
Problem 1 (h) • $10,000 LTCG to for the estate which also is entitled to the Section 1223(9) automatic long-term holding period.
Problem 2 • Assume for simplicity that she only deducted $9,000 of her $10,000 of annual rental payments. • Therefore, upon exercising the option, Tacker would have a basis in the option rights of $25,000 and would pay another $225,000 (total cost $250,000) for the property. • Tacker would realize and recognize a gain of $50,000.
Problem 2 • Tacker has a STCG of $50,000 on the sale. • If Tacker sells her option for $75,000, then she recognizes $50,000 of LTCG because, per Code Sec 1234, she characterizes the gain on the option based upon the underlying property and she has held the option for 25 years.
Problem 3 • This issue here is the holding period. The realized gain is clearly $100,000. • The Paul decision requires the proceeds be allocated between the portion of the construction completed more than 1 year before the sale and the portion completed within 1 year of sale. • The $50,000 gain attributable to the land is LTCG. • The $25,000 of gain attributed to construction more than 1 year before the sale is LTCG. • The $25,000 of gain on construction within 1 year of sale is STCG.