160 likes | 356 Views
ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002. EXAMINATION REPORT. ABET level 4 June 2002. Positives: Significant increase in pass percentage in 8 of eleven learning areas. Large increases in isiXhosa, Life Orientation and Natural Sciences. Split of MLMMS into ML was very successful – 70% pass rate
E N D
ABET LEVEL 4 JUNE 2002 EXAMINATION REPORT
ABET level 4 June 2002 Positives: • Significant increase in pass percentage in 8 of eleven learning areas. • Large increases in isiXhosa, Life Orientation and Natural Sciences. • Split of MLMMS into ML was very successful – 70% pass rate • Increased participation of other sectors.
ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: English • Pleasing to see previous reports have been read and suggestions implemented. • Language level of candidates generally low. • Lack of comprehension is evident. • Educators should study the national guidelines. • Require national intervention – English for learners whose home language is not Eng.
ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: Afrikaans • Needs to be better placement of learners. • Educators appear to be more confident in the teaching of the various unit standards. • Learners need to read the questions properly. • Grammar and sentence construction were two areas that needed attention.
ABET Level 4 June 2002LLC: isXhosa • Candidates showed a lack of practice in writing. • Sections on summarising and analysis of a poem were poorly done or not attempted. • It appears that candidates coped better with questions that did not expect them to think independantly. • Many questions were too short for the marks allocated.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Mathematical Literacy • Section A of the paper contributed to ML. • Report focuses on areas that require attention. • Problems included geometric and number patterns, decimals, time and volume.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Mathematical Sciences • Report draws attention to areas that need assistance. • Problems with time, percentages, decimals. • Candidates could not interpret information from a table that was provided. • Most candidates struggled with algebra. • Most candidates struggled with drawing of a bar graph.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Arts and Culture • General improvement in candidates ability to answer the questions. • Candidates appeared to be more confident. • Literacy still a problem. • Candidates did not recognise technical terms. • Teaching should ensure that candidates read illustrations through their own interpretation rather than merely describing what they see.
ABET Level 4 June 2002EMS • Generally an improvement in candidates understanding of aspects of EMS such as the cash receipt journal and cash payment journal. • Recommends using a specialist to present the accounting section of the US. • Candidates able to read tables but unable to analyse the data. • Candidates require greater exposure to case studies. • Use the assessment guidelines to prepare the learenrs.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Human & Social Sciences • Candidates should attempt all the MCQs as there is no negative marking. • Candidates did not understand or were not taught specific terms in history e.g movement, association and expression. • Very little skill in interpreting graphs. • Problems re drawing conclusions, arguing own point of view and understanding. • Candidates need to be exposed to everyday problems in their communities.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Life Orientation • Successful as learners did very well. • Answering MCQs problem – need technical guidance. • Terminology appeared to another problem area. • All teachers must teach emergency procedures and reporting emergency situations.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Natural Sciences • Pleased by overall improvement by candidates. • Specific content problems are mentioned in the report e.g. cells, natural resources, sources of energy – all mentioned in the range statements. • Examination technique a problem • reading questions carefully. • drawing a table. • Answers that were too short when asked to explain.
ABET Level 4 June 2002Technology • General lack of understanding of the content needed in this learning area. • Answers show a lack of study or application. • Learner’s need prior assistance in planning an answer sheet e.g numbering correctly.
ABET Level 4 June 2002SMME • Not sure whether the candidates did poorly because of reading and interpretation problems or because they were not ready for the examination. • Some candidates are not ready in terms of examination technique wrt reading, writing, interpreting and analysing texts. • Suggests that the language used be made simpler. • Recommends training of teachers and assessment of their knowledge of the learning area.