120 likes | 245 Views
The National Ports Strategy and Jurisdictional Plans. Address to Infrastructure Australia’s Ports and Cities: Partnerships that Work Conference, Newcastle, 12 March 2012. J Austen, Office of National Infrastructure Coordinator. Context Issues Results. National ports strategy – plans.
E N D
The National Ports Strategy and Jurisdictional Plans Address to Infrastructure Australia’s Ports and Cities: Partnerships that Work Conference, Newcastle, 12 March 2012 J Austen, Office of National Infrastructure Coordinator
Context • Issues • Results National ports strategy – plans
Fulcrum for supply chains Freight infrastructure needs If this can’t be done, what can? Ports strategy is obvious Port Plans - context
Why? What? Who? Plans - issues
The problem is place specific - trade-offs need a ‘place for freight’ Especially in cities - plenty of people - scarce, valuable land Interests of the tiers converge here Why?
Bluntly – there is room for improvement - waste / underutilisation / disinvestment - stress on business & community - questions re transport policy / projects Why?
Why? City side cost is high and rising
Why? Cities and international gateways almost synonymous
Show that supply could match demand - possible layout including in city - how that layout might be achieved - opportunities for stakeholders - role of ‘performance indicators’ What?
Fail to plan = plan to fail Some views put to us: “we managed to water it down” “not a matter of national significance” “why the Commonwealth intervention” A proposed compact: - recognition / protection of the plan What?
We all see the plan ie. it is public - community, industry Who does the plan? - an over-rated question A logical initiator is the port controller - since the port can’t move Co-opt other parties - especially roads and railways - integrate with city planning Who?
Greater confidence for investors and community A platform to improve competitiveness A proper role for ports Better cities Results