220 likes | 365 Views
Legal Issues. Contracts & Electronic Discovery Source: CSA Security Guidance Report v.3 Presented by: Toby Tobkin – toby.tobkin@gmail.com. Motivation. why i chose this topic. Privacy Law. Data Privacy. Data on the Internet is vulnerable I won’t show a proof for this. Data Privacy.
E N D
Legal Issues Contracts & Electronic Discovery Source: CSA Security Guidance Report v.3 Presented by: Toby Tobkin – toby.tobkin@gmail.com
Motivation • why i chose this topic
Data Privacy • Data on the Internet is vulnerable • I won’t show a proof for this
Data Privacy • Data on the Internet is vulnerable • I won’t show a proof for this • Burden of protection of personal data is on organizations in some regions
Data Privacy • Data on the Internet is vulnerable • I won’t show a proof for this • Burden of protection of personal data is on organizations in some regions • Some regional organizations that mandate this: • OECD: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development • APEC: Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation • EEA: European Economic Arena
Examples of US Privacy Laws • Federal • Laws: GLBA, HIPAA, COPPA • FTC orders
Examples of US Privacy Laws • Federal • Laws: GLBA, HIPAA, COPPA • FTC orders • State • Generally: reasonable security measures must be in place • including with subcontractors
Privacy by Contract • If some aspect of privacy isn’t regulated, it could still be specified by a contract • but you knew that • Company using cloud service may • Have a contractual obligation to protect employee data it’s storing • Want to protect their trade secrets stored in the cloud • Have a privacy contract with their customers • Specify that data can only be used for certain purposes
Concepts • Data custodian
Concepts • Data custodian • Due diligence
Discovery Phase • In litigation, this comes prior to the trial • Philosophy: neither party should be able to keep secrets from each other
Discovery: Problems • Data that may be demanded might not be under a party’s control • Might be on a third party’s backup system • Or something • Problem: whose obligation is it to produce requested information? • According to this document: it depends
Discovery: Problems • Standard e-discovery tools may not work
Discovery: Problems • Standard e-discovery tools may not work • Rules on preservation don’t seem to be clear • who pays for storage? client? service provider? • what constitutes “relevant” information to a litigation? • what about programmatically purged data?
Discovery: Problems • Standard e-discovery tools may not work • Rules on preservation don’t seem to be clear • who pays for storage? client? service provider? • what constitutes “relevant” information to a litigation? • what about programmatically purged data? • Collection can be difficult • Limited bandwidth • Limited client functionality • Physical forensics could be overly intrusive on something like EC2
Discovery: Problems • Standard e-discovery tools may not work • Rules on preservation don’t seem to be clear • who pays for storage? client? service provider? • what constitutes “relevant” information to a litigation? • what about programmatically purged data? • Collection can be difficult • Limited bandwidth • Limited client functionality • Physical forensics could be overly intrusive on something like EC2 • Native production
Discovery: Solutions • Have terms in service agreement about e-discovery • e.g. accessing large amounts of data at once when bandwidth is usually limited