National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

1. National Center for Food Protection & DefenseRisk CommunicatorTraining For Food Defense Preparedness, Response & Recovery Date Presenters

2. Risk Communication Team

3. Risk Communicator Training Modules • Module 1 An Introduction to Risk Communication • Module 2 Food Defense & the Psychology of Terrorism • Module 3 Message Development & Delivery • Module 4 Risk Communication Preparedness & Planning • Module 5 Media Relations & Practice

5. Module OneAn Introduction to Risk Communication National Center for Food Protection & Defense Risk Communicator Training

6. An Introduction to Risk Communication topic one Defining Risk Communication: What It IS & What It Isn’t topic two Risk Perception: Facts & Feelings topic three We’re All Risk Communicators: It Is Your Job!

7. Module OneLearner Outcomes • Apply the risk communication goals to a foodborne outbreak. • Describe the function of risk communication within the risk management model. • Identify the factors that drive perceptions of risk. • Compare and contrast communicator roles from various segments of the food system.

8. module oneAn Introduction to Risk Communication topic one Defining Risk Communication: What It Is & What It Isn’t

9. Risk communication defined An open, two-way exchange of information and opinion about risk leading to better understanding and better risk management decisions. Source: USDA, 1992

10. Risk communication goals • Tailor communication so it takes into account the emotional response to an event. • Empowers audience to make informed decision-making. • Prevent negative behavior and/or encourage constructive responses to crisis or danger.

11. "The best way to guard against the flu is to get vaccinated, which helps to protect you, your loved ones, and your community." CDC official Seasonal flu vaccination September, 2006

12. “We are very concerned for those who became ill and our thoughts are with them as we continue to work closely with health officials as they try to determine the root cause of this. While the authorities do not know the source of this contamination, they have said there haven't been any new cases since Nov 29, so they are confident that it is most likely no longer a threat." State emergency response spokesperson Pandemic preparedness October, 2006

13. … “The idea that salad greens have become a source of E. coli is very shocking, and it means we have a real problem in the food system. This is very serious." University Food Studies & Public Health Specialist E. coli – spinach outbreak September, 2006

14. “We have not with certainty traced the illness to any specific product or source. But people in high-risk groups for developing listeriosis, particularly pregnant women, the elderly and persons with compromised immune systems should take precautions.” CDC spokesperson Re: Listeriosis - hot dogs outbreak December, 1998

15. “…Spinach is high in antioxidants, which can protect against heart disease and cancer. If you’re having a hard time finding spinach, there are lots of other greens with nutritional value. We should not forget about mustard greens, bok choy, kale and chard, broccoli and Brussel sprouts. I would suggest things like romaine lettuce and arugula.” County Dietitian Following E.coli – spinach outbreak, October, 2006

16. …Concerning restoring public trust following the outbreak: "Farmers approach it as the most serious concern that they have. The most important commodity that we have is the public trust." Industry association spokesperson E. coli – spinach outbreak September, 2006

17. Communication models Basic Communication Model • Uni-directional or we tell “them” approach • Who says - what - when - to whom - through what channel - with what effect Risk Communication Model • Multi-directional • Actively involves the audience as an information source

18. Audience assessment Audience involvement Message Risk Communication elements Multi-directional & actively involves the audience as an information source • Logistics • Metamessaging • Listening • Self-assessment • Evaluation

19. Risk communication outcomes • Decrease illness, injury & deaths • Build support for response plan • Assist in executing response plan • Prevent misallocation & wasting of resources • Keep decision-makers well informed • Counter or correct rumors • Foster informed decision-making concerning risk

20. Environmental Science Social Psychology Philosophy Political Science Communication Chemistry Public Health Epidemiology Contributing disciplines Risk Communication is trans-disciplinary: Love Canal (’78) & Three Mile Island (’79)

21. Crisis Response Spontaneous Post-event Uni-directional Reactive Equivocal Preparedness & Recovery Planned, tested, strategic Pre-event activities Multi-directional Proactive Certain Risk & crisis communication

22. Applying the concepts Unpacking the Message

23. Spin Public relations Damage control Crisis management How to write a press release How to give a media interview Always intended to make people “feel better” or reduce their fear Summary What Risk Communication is NOT:

24. Summary • Considers human perceptions of risk • Multi-directional communication among communicators, publics and stakeholders • Activities before, during and after an event • An integral part of an emergency response plan • Empowers people to make their own informed decisions And what Risk Communication IS:

25. module oneAn Introduction to Risk Communication topic two Risk Perception: Facts & Feelings

26. Risk analysis paradigm • Everything we do involves risk • Zero risk is unachievable • Options exist for managing every risk

27. Risk management All potentially effected parties are engaged in: Risk Communication RISK MANAGEMENT Hazard Identification Risk Assessment

28. Interpreting risk • Communicating about risk is difficult because of the way people interpret risk • Involves competing perspectives: objective vs subjective

29. Developed by a leading research university U-phoria! • Experience short term memory boost • Enjoy pleasant feelings in times of stress

30. Developed by a leading research university • 16 years in the making • Provides short term memory boost & pleasant feeling in times of stress 24-36 hours in duration • Multiple trials examining potential short term & long term side effects

31. What shapes perceptions of risk • Hazard – something that can go wrong • Probability– likelihood of it happening • Consequences– implications of hazard • Value– subjective evaluation of the relative importance of what might be lost

32. What shapes perceptions of risk • Hazard – something that can go wrong • Probability – likelihood of it happening • Consequences – implications of hazard • Value – subjective evaluation of the relative importance of what might be lost THINKING FEELING

33. Scientist - Consumer disconnect SCIENTIST EXPERT knows thinks CONSUMER PUBLIC feels believes Fact-based: hazard, probability Value-based: consequences, value

34. "In fact, probably getting out of your automobile and walking into the store to buy beef, has a higher probability than you'll be hit by an automobile than ... the probability of any harm coming to you from eating beef." U.S. Agriculture Undersecretary Japanese import ban on U.S. beef January, 2006

35. With permission from the Star Tribune Mad Cow, 2003 Scientists focus on danger - consumers on the ‘whole cow’

36. Peter Sandman “The risks that upset people are completely different than the risks that kill people.”

38. Perceptions of risk Risk = Hazard + Outrage SOURCE: Peter Sandman

39. A variety of risk comm approaches High Outrage (fear, anger) Low High Hazard (danger)

40. Goal:Reduce outrage so people don’t take unnecessary precautions Outrage Management High Outrage (fear,anger) Low High Hazard (danger)

41. Goal: Increase concern for a real hazard to motivate preventive action High Outrage (fear,anger) Precaution Advocacy Low High Hazard (danger)

42. Goal:Acknowledge hazard, validate concern, give people ways to act Crisis / Emergency Communication High Outrage (fear,anger) Low High Hazard (danger)

43. Applying the concepts Hazard +Outrage and Your Organization

44. module oneAn Introduction to Risk Communication topic three We’re All Risk Communicators: It IS Your Job!

45. Prevailing model Risk communication is centralized in PIO or spokesperson functions • Industry CEO • Organization or agency head • Communications director • Other “official spokespersons”

46. FEMA Food system risk communicators Official spokespersons • Industry CEO, food agency director, labor union officer, consumer organization head Communication staff members • Public information officers, technical writers, web managers Subject matter experts • Scientists, food system experts, terrorism experts, quality assurance officers

47. Food system risk communicators Educators & outreach specialists • Extension staff, consumer educators, outreach workers, public health educators, consumer hotline staff Public health & health care specialists • Agency directors, food inspectors, physicians, nurses, lab specialists, sanitarians

48. CSREES Alternative model: We’re ALL risk communicators Including informal channels & networks • Neighbor to neighbor • Rumor mill • Online blogs • “Person on the street” interviews • Talk radio • Others???

49. Case Study:Schwan’s salmonella outbreak, 1994 • Company features home delivered food products • Est. 224,000 persons were exposed to ice cream contaminated with salmonella • Contamination traced to tanker trucks that hauled ice cream premix • Interaction between Schwan’s door-to-door delivery drivers & customers was key recovery and restoring trust

50. Best Practices for EffectiveMessage Development For Effective Risk Communication • Risk & crisis communication is an ongoing process