80 likes | 155 Views
Framework Implementation and Impact Study Consultative Forum 18 November 2008 NQAI Report Deirdre Stritch. Focus of Authority Report. Reference point for Study and sectoral reports Sets out: background to, and development of, Framework and ATP; architecture of the Framework;
E N D
Framework Implementation and Impact Study Consultative Forum18 November 2008NQAI Report Deirdre Stritch
Focus of Authority Report • Reference point for Study and sectoral reports Sets out: • background to, and development of, Framework and ATP; • architecture of the Framework; • relationship between the Framework and different sectors, including roles and responsibilities of agencies/institutions; • Assessment of implementation to-date; • Assessment of initial impact of Framework.
Achieving an Integrated and Inclusive Framework • Framework defined as: "The single, nationally and internationally accepted entity, through which all learning achievements may be measured and related to each other in a coherent way and which defines the relationship between all education and training awards." • Integrated Framework • For first time, national recognition of outcomes of basic learning (e.g., literacy, numeracy) • Designed to include existing and former awards made by awarding bodies in Ireland • Designed to facilitate recognition of awards made by international and professional bodies • Implementation of Framework and ATP requires embedding in education and training structures and arrangements • Explicitly underpinned by quality assurance (main responsibilities rest with awarding bodies and providers)
A National Framework • Legislation – Qualifications Act 1999 • Overarching objectives: • To support lifelong learning; • To promote a culture in which the learner is at the centre of the qualifications system; • To maintain and promote quality; • To respond to the needs of the economy, society and the individual; and • To facilitate the recognition of national and international qualifications/awards.
Implementation and Impact Initial rapid implementation • adoption of award-types; inclusion of awards etc Focus now on deepening and consolidating implementation • shift to learning outcomes. • Consistency in titles/naming conventions • Progress across sectors Issues arising – Impact of Framework and ATP policies • Framework beginning to impact on recruitment practice • Framework increasingly used as a policy tool, e.g. the National Skills Strategy
International Dimension • Pro-active approach to development and implementation of European meta-frameworks: Bologna Framework and EQF • Bologna Framework and EQF entirely compatible and complementary • In case of both meta-frameworks: • Primacy with the National Framework of Qualifications • Qualifications relate to national frameworks and frameworks talk to each other through meta-frameworks • Countries self-certify the link of their national frameworks to European frameworks following established criteria and procedures • Compatibility of NFQ to Bologna Framework verified November 2006 • Compatibility of NFQ to EQF expected summer 2009
Conclusions • Policy approach to Framework implementation largely completed • Implementation expected to take time and to vary across sectors – multiple players, cultural shift • Focus of implementation to-date on awarding bodies and providers • Focus now on deepening and consolidating implementation • Increasing use of Framework in public policy • Continued engagement with broader European developments