1 / 17

Adjustable, realistic, computer controlled putting green Team 12

Adjustable, realistic, computer controlled putting green Team 12. Team 12:. Paul Bloem (EE). Mitch Brummel (ME). Jason Dornbos (ME). Nate Van Heukelum (ME). Kyle Harvey (ME). Overview. Problem Solution Goals Design Analysis Feasibility Issues Resources Questions?. Problem.

terrel
Download Presentation

Adjustable, realistic, computer controlled putting green Team 12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adjustable, realistic, computer controlled putting green Team 12

  2. Team 12: PaulBloem (EE) MitchBrummel (ME) JasonDornbos (ME) NateVan Heukelum (ME) KyleHarvey (ME)

  3. Overview • Problem • Solution • Goals • Design • Analysis • Feasibility • Issues • Resources • Questions?

  4. Problem Most practice greens are unrealistic or difficult to use Thisis an actual green: This is a practice green: Wewanttobridge the gap.

  5. Solution • A realistic and simple computer controlled putting green with adjustable contours

  6. Goals • Realistic • Automatically adjusts contours • Computer controlled • Simple to use • Walk on entire surface • Competitively priced Not like this… Like This!

  7. Design

  8. Design (Cont.) • Mechanical Movement System • Linear Actuators • Stepper Motors • Surface Support Structure • Bar in bar method • Sheet material • Surface Material • Cross stitching • Row stitching

  9. Design (Cont.) • Electrical • Computer • User Interface • Statistics Tracking

  10. Design (Cont.)

  11. Design (Cont.) • Frame Structure • Modules • Metal frame • Wood paneling • Ball Return

  12. Analysis • Linear actuator force calculations • Surface support structure stiffness calculations • Frame structure beam calculations • Financial estimate: $12000-$15000

  13. Feasibility Sample Survey Results • Market Research • Competition • Survey Where would you place an indoor putting green?

  14. Feasibility • System • Linear actuators • Surface material • Surface support structure • Frame • Electrical/Computer

  15. Issues • Cost of actuators • 3D preview of contour on screen • Seaming of donated surface material for prototype • Electrical work

  16. Resources • Professor VanderLeest - Team Advisor • Professor Nielsen - Engineering Professor • Mr. Spoelhof - Industrial Consultant • Business 396 Team • Phil Jasperse - Machine Shop • John Klimas - Haydon Kerk • Doug Steeves - Synthetic Turf of Illinois • Brian Bolt and Jerry Bergsma - Calvin Golf Coaches

  17. Questions?

More Related