230 likes | 405 Views
‘Klin’-ing up: reforming taxes on labour in Poland. Michał Myck, DIW-Berlin (joint work with Leszek Morawski, WNE-UW). Outline:. The tax “klin” (tax wedge) on labour in Poland. Taxing labour – effect of taxes and who pays them average and marginal taxes on labour
E N D
‘Klin’-ing up: reforming taxes on labour in Poland Michał Myck, DIW-Berlin (joint work with Leszek Morawski, WNE-UW)
Outline: • The tax “klin” (tax wedge) on labour in Poland. • Taxing labour – effect of taxes and who pays them • average and marginal taxes on labour • System of taxes on labour in Poland • Empirical evidence for Poland – how high is the ‘klin’ in Poland? • Tax reforms and reform options and the effect on the ‘klin’ in Poland. • Conclusions.
Taxing labour • Demand, supply and taxes – the first year textbook example, • elasticities and „allocation“ of taxes. • Taxes on labour: • Effects of average and marginal taxes (participation vs intensity of labour). • Non-linearity of the tax system and the difference between average and marginal tax rates: • tax allowances, tax credits, tax rates, thresholds, etc. • Effects of reforms on the ‘klin’ – importance of analysing marginal and average tax rates.
Taxing labour • What is tax on labour? • Social Security Contributions, Health Insurance, Income Tax, But: • retirement insurance (postponed consumption) (see: Disney, 2004), • indirect taxes? Tax wedge as difference between tax total labour cost and real consumption (see: Nunziata, 2005). • The tax ‘wedge’ identified as contributing to increases in unemployment in Europe (see: Nickell, 1997, 1998). • but the effect of the tax wedge relatively small (Nickell, Nunziata and Ochel, 2005): increases in the tax wedge as responsible for about 10% of the increase in unemployment in Europe between 1960s and 1990s. • High level of tax wedge on labour in transition countries (including Poland) but little empirical analysis of the problem.
Total labour cost, gross wage and net earnings in Poland • Gross and net wage: • SSCs and Income Tax in Poland: • SSC rates applied to „gross wage” (total labour cost minus employer‘s SSCs), • Income Tax system and Health Insurance applied to „taxable income” (i.e. net of SSCs).
Calculating marginal and average taxes • Focus on taxes on labour for each individual, thus need to take account of: • demographics • taxable income from other sources • in couples – income of the other spouse • Taxes computed with reference to the total labour cost. • Average tax rate: • Marginal tax rate:
Level and distribution of the ‘klin’ • Data from the Household Budgets’ Survey (BBGD-2005) • Sample selection: • only individuals with positive earnings, • age restriction: 18-60/65. • Analysis using SIMPL – the Polish microsimulation model • combines information about the tax and benefit system with demographic characteristics, incomes and other information in the BBGD data.
Marginal rates of tax on labour and family type in BBGD: Singles no children Men in two-earner couples
Average and marginal tax rates – cumulative frequencies Base system – 2005 (with child tax credit)
Reforming taxes on labour in Poland • Actual and hypothetical reforms: • Reform I – (2007) – employee disability SSC rate from 6.5 to 4.5%, • Reform II – (Jan. 2008) – employee disability SSC from 6.5% to 1.5%, employer SSC from 6.5% to 4.5%, • Reform III – two rate income tax system (18% and 32%), • Reform IV – single rate income tax system: 18% (credit adjusted), • Reform V – (Jan. 2008) – child tax credit increased to 1100 per child, • Reform VI – ‘Gilowska package’ – Reform II + Reform V, • Reform VII – 15% linear tax (without tax credits), • Reform VIII – 15% linear tax (with tax credits). • Effects of reforms on marginal and average tax rates.
Conclusion • The tax-wedge (“klin”) on labour identified in Poland as an important factor contributing to problems on the labour market. • Significant reductions in the “klin” as a result of 2007/2008 reforms (average ATR falls from 41.3% to 33.1%) • The “Gilowska” package represents a much higher reduction in the tax wedge compared to a linear 15% system (average ATR, 42.1% or 39.3%). • Further reforms still awaiting introduction. • Important issues: • who will gain from the reforms and how much (elasticities!)? • how reforms affect those who are not working (difference in the earnings distributions) • what is the future of the linear tax? • Next steps in the reforms of the tax burden on labour? • Who can introduce “major reforms” in the current political system?